10 Books that Screwed Up the World et plus d'un million d'autres livres sont disponibles pour le Kindle d'Amazon. En savoir plus


ou
Identifiez-vous pour activer la commande 1-Click.
Plus de choix
Vous l'avez déjà ? Vendez votre exemplaire ici
Désolé, cet article n'est pas disponible en
Image non disponible pour la
couleur :
Image non disponible

 
Commencez à lire 10 Books that Screwed Up the World sur votre Kindle en moins d'une minute.

Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici ou téléchargez une application de lecture gratuite.

10 Books That Screwed Up the World: And 5 Others That Didn't Help [Livre audio, MP3 Audio, Version intégrale] [Anglais] [MP3 CD]

Benjamin Wiker

Prix : EUR 15,51 Livraison à EUR 0,01 En savoir plus.
  Tous les prix incluent la TVA
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Il ne reste plus que 1 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon. Emballage cadeau disponible.

Formats

Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 15,85  
Relié EUR 23,54  
CD, Livre audio, CD, Version intégrale EUR 23,25  
MP3 CD, Livre audio, MP3 Audio, Version intégrale EUR 15,51  

Offres spéciales et liens associés


Détails sur le produit


En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Dans ce livre (En savoir plus)
Parcourir et rechercher une autre édition de ce livre.
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Couverture | Copyright | Table des matières | Extrait | Index
Rechercher dans ce livre:

Commentaires en ligne 

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 3.1 étoiles sur 5  143 commentaires
216 internautes sur 247 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Does Christianity invalidate critical writing? 20 mars 2011
Par the bishop - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié
Many of the reviews here and also on audible, seem to focus on the fact that the author is Christian as reason to avoid, and apparently, to become very angry after reading the book. All I would say is: 1. if you believe human rights are innate 2. human dignity and worth is innate and 3. moral truth is non-negotiable and transcends culture or society, then you will probably read the book without getting upset, and you likely will find it interesting. If on the other hand, you believe that 1. human rights are arbitrary, evolve, and come from government 2. human beings are animals and the value of a human life is equal to the value of any given animal life and 3. morality is relative, and political movments can alter moral "truths" to their benefit or for the perceived benefit of mankind, then you probably will be angry at Wiker and his "Christian fundamentalist" "clap-trap". More disturbing though, is how many reviewers attack the author as "Christian" as if this invalidates his ability to think and reason. It is amazing how successful the secular left has been at making "religion" the antonym of "thought". There was a time when all of Western Civilization, science, math, jurisprudence, academic research, hellenistic reason, was preserved and cultivated and embodied by the Church, when both reason and morality were both necessary for some idea or some person to be counted as virtuous. Today many reviewers here feel compelled to show their secular, cultural-relativist intolerance by giving an unsubstantiated 1-star review and pronouncing to the world, "Don't read this book, the author has a Christian world view!" The universities have done their job well.
51 internautes sur 57 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 An excellent introduction 3 juillet 2012
Par Wendi - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié
I checked this book out from my library, and I read it over the space of about four hours. It's a quick, fairly easy read. Atheists will, no doubt, hate it because philosophically it is opposed to atheism.
He quotes directly from the books and authors he critiques (except in the case of Kinsey becuase the Kinsey institute refused to grant permission for any quoting) and provides plenty of footnotes.

It's not intended to be comprehensive or even the last word about these authors, books, and the ideas they promoted.
In fact, in the introduction, Wiker says: "Shall we have a book burning? Indeed not! Such a course of action is indefensible, if only for environmental reasons. As I learned long ago, the best cure- the only cure, once the really harmful books have multiplied like viruses through endless editions- is to *read* them. Know them forward and backward. Seize each one by its malignant heart and expose it to the light of day."

That is what he has attempted to do. It's a short, readable book with only a chapter per book/author, so of course it's merely an overview, an introduction, a brief synopsis of what he thinks is wrong with the book in question and the author's worldview. I don't think he intended that his readers should let his descriptions suffice. Rather, unlike the negative reviewers here, it appears to me he expects (and hopes) that you will read his book and then go ahead and *read* the books he is talking about.

It was fascinating to me to see the source of many of the ideas that have gained acceptance and are now taken for granted by our culture. I particularly appreciate the point that rather than merely being 'products of their time,' these people were the architects of their time, the movers and shakers, the creators of the very objectionable points of view we dismiss as 'products of their time.' No, their times (and ours) are the consequences of their ideas.
212 internautes sur 264 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Very Important Synthesis for Popular Reading 21 avril 2010
Par Goldribbon - Publié sur Amazon.com
Since so many others have reviewed the content, let me just say that:

a) I actually read the book
b) I teach as an adjunct in a related area in higher education and am a published academic author
c) It is a popular synthesis, so it won't be all things to all people
d) Overall, it is quite correct that these books (and a few others) have greatly damaged human society, more so by a great deal of uncritical thinking that is lauded in higher education as critical thinking
e) This is the reason why almost all of the negative reviews don't critique the book but instead make bigoted, hate-speech toward religious people who never hurt anyone (and these reviewers have clearly never read this book, the books the author mentions or the Bible for that matter--not counting a few quotes from some wacky, tokin' college prof (aka most of my professional colleagues))
f) Read this book--what people don't know really has and is damaging humanity
274 internautes sur 346 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Crying in the Wilderness 26 juillet 2008
Par Gary Strickland - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat vérifié
I remember almost thirty years ago a brother-in-law retorting, during a discussion about child-rearing, that he intended to raise his children as wild stallions in a state of nature. I recall commenting that the poor deluded man was merely repeating what he had heard in his sophomore sociology and psychology classes and that, in doing so, he manifested his ignorance of the subject.

One reviewer of Dr. Wiker's book, "10 Books that Screwed up the World," offered the following thought:

"Ideas can certainly be dangerous but, once they are articulated in print, a thinking person has an opportunity to consider them rationally and counter them. This process is much more difficult if we are working from an oral articulation of ideas because orators can sway emotion and equivocate more effectively."

While intended to be a criticism of Professor Wiker ("Is this guy an enemy of free speech?"), the critic, in fact, makes his point; few people have actually read these books. Like my brother-in-law, had they actually read Rousseau, other than Emile, had they actually read Hobbes, other than the usual snippets of Leviathan offered, had they read Darwin's the Descent of Man, Machiavelli's The Prince, etc., they might have been better able to digest the unfounded and destructive utopian visions of Marx, Lenin, Hitler, and assess the illusions conjured by Freud, Sanger, Mead, and Kinsey. The reality is that few who have proffered these writers as icons of enlightened intellectualism, namely the professorial and teaching class, have taken the time to consider their products rationally. And, certainly those to whom it has been asserted that the writings comprise a source of deep reflection beneficial to humanity - essential to an understanding of humanitas - have not taken the opportunity to consider them rationally and counter the assertions. These vapid arguments have seeped into the mainstream only because they were developed by "so-and-so." In other words, the foundation is ipse dixit; the proof is hearsay.

That's why Professor Wiker bemoans the fact that the writings he has singled out have had such profound influence. If writings are not actually read and subjected to rational assessment, it would be better had they never been written. Unfortunately, the writings that Wiker addresses have been and continue to be highly detrimental to the body politic and the human soul. That is the more important reason that they should never have been written.

"10 Books that Screwed up the World" is easily read in a couple of sittings; is readily understood; and, is a must read especially for young people headed for the "castles" of higher learning.
17 internautes sur 19 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Great intro to contemporary impact of these books 29 mars 2012
Par J. Green - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat vérifié
Based on the premise that ideas have consequences and writing ideas down for future generations amplifies these consequences, Wiker gives background information about each author, the author's imagination of humanity, draws out some specific ideas from the selected books and explains the consequences at the time of their writing and in our society today.

I was surprised by some of the selections, particularly Descartes, but the point Wiker draws about the consequences of _some_ of Descartes ideas and how they were used by others (the authors of the other books that screwed up the world in particular).

Those who haven't read the book might infer that this is a black-list of books to be avoided. Those who post this in the reviews are simply commenting out of ignorance, posting "reviews" of books they haven't read, and in aghast horror of someone telling you not to read a book disagreed with they declare you must not read this book they disagree with (and that without even reading it!). Brilliant.

Rather, this is an overview of these books and how their ideas have impacted society negatively as a spring board to whet the appetite to do more reading of these books. Since reading this text I have acquired copies of several of the books discussed, and plan on inviting friends who haven't read 10 Books that Screwed up the World to read and discuss some of the 10 books.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Thème:
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier
 

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon
   


Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique


Commentaires

Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?