Flat Tax (Hoover Institution Press Publication) et plus d'un million d'autres livres sont disponibles pour le Kindle d'Amazon. En savoir plus

Vous l'avez déjà ? Vendez votre exemplaire ici
Flat Tax
 
 
Commencer à lire Flat Tax (Hoover Institution Press Publication) sur votre Kindle en moins d'une minute .

Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici ou téléchargez une application de lecture gratuite.

Flat Tax [Anglais] [Broché]

Robert E Hall , Alvin Rabushka


Voir les offres de ces vendeurs.


Formats

Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 4,41  
Relié EUR 11,58  
Broché EUR 7,74  
Broché, 15 mars 1995 --  

Descriptions du produit

Amazon.com

Here's the book that started the flat tax debate back in 1985, updated in an edition for the 1990s. Robert Hall and Alvin Rabushka present their plan as fair, efficient, simple, and workable. All income in the United States would be taxed once at the rate of 19 percent, and there would be generous allowances for families. This system and its postcard-sized tax form would wipe out $100 billion in annual compliance costs and demolish the Washington culture of lobbyists, whose entire industry depends upon tampering with the rules of free enterprise.

Book Description

This new and updated edition of The Flat Tax sets forth the flat-tax plan developed by Robert Hall and Alvin Rabushka, senior fellows at the Hoover Institution, who believe it is the most fair, efficient, simple, and workable plan on the table. The proposal taxes all income, once and only once, at a uniform low rate of 19 percent. It permits a tax-free allowance of $25,500 for family of four, thereby exempting many poor and lower-middle-income households from taxation. All wage earners would pay less tax than under the current system. The flat-tax plan tax returns can be filed on a postcard.

This flat-tax plan is not an academic abstraction. Hall and Rabushka have designed tax forms, rewritten the Internal Revenue Code, and worked out all the practical details. The plan has withstood the scrutiny of leading experts on taxation and has been enthusiastically endorsed by many of them. Both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal have praised the flat tax. Both Republicans and Democrats have introduced it as bills in previous sessions of Congress.


Détails sur le produit


En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Robert Ernest Hall
Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Consultez la page Robert Ernest Hall d'Amazon

Dans ce livre (En savoir plus)
Première phrase
The federal income tax is a complete mess. Lire la première page
En découvrir plus
Concordance
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Couverture | Copyright | Table des matières | Extrait | Index | Quatrième de couverture
Rechercher dans ce livre:

Associer des mots-clés à ce produit

 (De quoi s'agit-il ?)
Considérez votre mot-clé comme une sorte d'étiquette définissant parfaitement ce produit.
Les mots-clés aident les clients à organiser et trouver leurs articles favoris.
Vos mots-clés : Ajouter votre premier mot-clé
 

Commentaires en ligne 

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:  5 commentaires
10 internautes sur 10 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Non-Political Review 19 janvier 2007
Par redhawk - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché
I'm not going to debate the merits or failings of the flat tax in this review. A book review is too short for that. The question is did this book clearly explain what the flat tax is, how it will work, what the authors believe the benefits are and the logic behind their arguments? Yes to all the above. Whether or not you think you'll agree, or whether or not you end up agreeing is beside the point. The flat tax is a suggested tax reform and if your interested in tax reform this is a great book to understand the nuts and bolts of the flat tax that many of the flat-tax proponents are supporting. If you read this, you will understand what is being debated when the flat tax is being discussed.
14 internautes sur 16 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Flat and Simple 15 avril 2008
Par D. W. MacKenzie - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat authentifié par Amazon
The title of this book is not quite accurate. Hall and Rabushka want flat and simple taxes. They want to flatten out rates and simplify, well eliminate the maze of complex exemptions in the existing tax code. What we have here is a point by point explanation of a program for scrapping the tax code, followed by a useful Q+A section.

Some of their claims regarding their reforms are a bit exaggerated. For example, the claim that "every study we can find shows that lower tax rates on businesses and employees increases the supply of labor, capital, and entrepreneurship". As an economist I agree with their conclusions, but there are some studies, albeit faulty ones, that contradict the above argument. Professional opinion is not uniform.

The flat tax is an idea that is good economic policy, but bad politics. Our current tax system does detract from economic development. There is no economic justification for collecting taxes through such a complex code. Our tax code is maintained in part by certain special interest groups (tax accountants and tax attorneys) and the politicians who they pay off (Democrats). There is little we can do to reason with people who are feeding off of the tax compliance industry. They are on the take and will not listen to reason.

Our tax code is further maintained by rank and file Democrats who believe that we can achieve some sort of `social justice' through the tax code. These persons are not bought off, and some of them will listen to reason. This is how we can get rid of the tax code: by shifting public opinion. If enough people come to see the tax code for what it really is, then the political balance will shift against the tax compliance industry. There was a serious drive to scrap the tax code in the mid 1990's, which Clinton blocked.

Scraping the tax code would not lead to Nirvana, but it is good policy. Scrapping the tax code would also do justice upon those who have been leeching off the rest of us all our lives. The accountants and lawyers who make money off the tax code are parasites. Scrapping the tax code would ruin many of them, financially, and they deserve at least that. I should be clear that this last remark was a moral/political/personal statement, not a professional economic opinion. The Flat Tax is an important book because it can have an impact on public opinion. It can be a part of scrapping the tax code.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
REQUIRED READING for an intelligent discussion of US tax code 18 août 2011
Par D. T. Miller - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat authentifié par Amazon
The 60,000 page tax code itself is the issue, not another tweak or incentive in the way of tax rates, credits, deductions, or what not. The uber rich (including Warren B and Bill G) pay VERY LITTLE as it stands now because of how the code protects those who have concentrated, inherited, or sudden wealth. For just one example, just set up a qualified multigenerational family foundation, put a big chunk of appreciated stock in it, and you avoid the majority of capital gains, income, and even estate tax - forever! The world of trusts and foundations is murky to most people, and the truly rich (as opposed to very high income workers/business owners - VERY different people) depend on your ignorance of how the code really works to perpetuate class warfare that in the end will leave them right where they are. Yes, it's the new American Aristocracy.

The only real answer to spur the economy and solve the deficit at the same time is a true flat tax with no or extremely limited deductions, with the first $40K (or whatever a living wage is) non-taxable for everyone.
Fair? Yes. Progressive versus what actually exists in practice today? Absolutely.

I laughed and cried when I read of Warren Buffett's recent plea to raise income tax rates for the super rich. I'm not sure Warren would like a truly flat tax as it would actually touch him. Put another way, raising the top bracket to 50% or so still wouldn't really affect him, since his 'income' is for the most part sheltered and never shows. Do the math with me - WB's $6.7M tax bill last year divided by his liquid net worth works out to about .1%, not the 'only 17%' (?!) of his income that he claims in his op-ed. Most of his net worth has not been and will not ever be taxed under the current code. Buffett's statements about the rich paying their fair share yesterday were intellectually dishonest in my opinion.

Read this classic if you actually want to be informed on this issue - they've covered all the objections you can think of, and more. Anything that Jerry Brown and Ronald Reagan agreed on might be worth a look.
Now, if only someone somewhere had the charisma and political will to actually pull such a thing off, given that legions of lobbyists, CPAs, bankers, investment advisors, etc. etc. etc. would do everything they could possibly do to kill any such reform since it would negatively affect their businesses.

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Thème:
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier
 

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon
   


Listmania!


Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique


Rechercher des articles similaires par thème


Commentaires

Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?