undrgrnd Cliquez ici Toys NEWNEEEW nav-sa-clothing-shoes nav-sa-clothing-shoes Cloud Drive Photos cliquez_ici nav_EasyChoice Cliquez ici Acheter Fire Pack Kindle pour les enfants cliquez_ici Jeux Vidéo Bijoux Marsala Bijoux Montres bijoux Fantaisie
HHhH et plus d'un million d'autres livres sont disponibles pour le Kindle d'Amazon. En savoir plus
Acheter d'occasion
EUR 1,24
+ EUR 2,99 (livraison)
D'occasion: Bon | Détails
Vendu par greener_books_uk
État: D'occasion: Bon
Commentaire: ** EXPEDIES DE UK ** Nous croyons que vous serez entièrement satisfait de notre service rapide et fiable. Toutes les commandes sont expédiées le plus rapidement possible! Achetez en toute confiance!
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir les 2 images

HHhH (Anglais) Relié – 3 mai 2012

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
Relié, 3 mai 2012
EUR 1,24
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 17,96 EUR 520,16

Livres anglais et étrangers
Lisez en version originale. Cliquez ici

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

HHhH is a highly original piece of work, at once charming, moving, and gripping (Martin Amis)

HHhH blew me away. Binet’s style fuses it all together: a neutral, journalistic honesty sustained with a fiction writer’s zeal and story-telling instincts. It’s one of the best historical novels I’ve ever come across (Brett Easton Ellis)

Extraordinary first novel… a literary triumph… The book’s final section, which recounts the assassination and subsequent manhunt in minute detail, is a masterpiece of tension, and its closing pages are extremely moving. Very few page-turners come as smart and original as this (The Times)

Mindblowing… obsessed with the past but gleaming with radical innovation, it’s urgent and new and terrifying and beautiful and pretty and much the best thing that’s happened in fiction for ages (Dazed and Confused)

Magnificent... unsurpassable... told with grace and elegance... exerts a hypnotic sway over the reader... something of a Greek tragedy and of the splendid thriller... All the details have such persuasive force that they remain indelibly recorded in the memory of the reader (Mario Vargas Llosa)

Présentation de l'éditeur

'HHhH blew me away. Binet’s style fuses it all together: a neutral, journalistic honesty sustained with a fiction writer’s zeal and story-telling instincts. It’s one of the best historical novels I’ve ever come across.' Bret Easton Ellis

Two men have been enlisted to kill the head of the Gestapo. This is Operation Anthropoid, Prague, 1942: two Czechoslovakian parachutists sent on a daring mission by London to assassinate Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the Nazi secret services, 'the hangman of Prague', 'the blond beast', 'the most dangerous man in the Third Reich'.

His boss is Heinrich Himmler but everyone in the SS says 'Himmler's brain is called Heydrich', which in German spells HHhH.

All the characters in HHhH are real. All the events depicted are true. But alongside the nerve-shredding preparations for the attack runs another story: when you are a novelist writing about real people, how do you resist the temptation to make things up?

HHhH is a panorama of the Third Reich told through the life of one outstandingly brutal man, a story of unbearable heroism and loyalty, revenge and betrayal. It is improbably entertaining and electrifyingly modern, a moving and shattering work of fiction.

Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre adresse e-mail ou numéro de téléphone mobile.

Détails sur le produit

En savoir plus sur les auteurs

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Dans ce livre

(En savoir plus)
Parcourir et rechercher une autre édition de ce livre.
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Couverture | Copyright | Extrait | Quatrième de couverture
Rechercher dans ce livre:

Quels sont les autres articles que les clients achètent après avoir regardé cet article?

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 220 commentaires
76 internautes sur 78 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Inventive approach to a distasteful subject 3 mai 2012
Par Caddis Nymph, Western Massachusetts - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
This novel deals with the subjugation of Czechoslovakia by the National Socialists during World War II and the beginning of the Final Solution. A grim subject presented in a rather unusual way: the author breaks through the fourth wall, you might say, by not only telling the story of the assassination of the Nazis' 'Protector' in Czechoslovakia, Reinhard Heydrich, a merciless and practical man who launched the Holocaust, but by 'turning to you' and making remarks about the history and characters being described.

Extremely well written, highly inventive, and gripping, this story of two men, a Czech and a Slav, who had early in Germany's rampage escaped northward to the Baltic and then by boat arrived in France, where they were assigned to the Foreign Legion's Czech battalions to fight Germany alongside the French. But given the fact that they were native speakers of the Czech language and capable fighters, the Czech government in exile in London scooped them up and assigned them to jump into Prague with the aim of assassinating Heydrich. How difficult that was, how they accomplished it, and how it turned out for them personally comprises this novel.

The author might be sitting opposite you, telling you the story, bringing it to life, but from time to time he leans in and gives you *his take on what's going on, how much he wishes he were with them, knowing them, taking the same risks, contemptuous of the German terror being visited on their land. Sometimes he shares his dreams that he's actually done or is doing exactly that, but then he shakes his head, pauses and goes back to telling the story in straight, unrelenting narrative.

Translated from the original French by a first-time translator; excellent work, very smooth, practically vernacular ... I noticed only a single error and that a minor quibble on my part. Both the author and translator deserve heartiest congratulations.
49 internautes sur 54 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HHhH is G- great 25 avril 2012
Par Robert Abidor - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
HHhH by Laurent Binet is many things: a history of the Third Reich's eastwards expansion, a novel about the successful plot to assassinate Reinhard Heydrich, the Butcher of Prague, and a critique of the art of writing historical fiction. In a quirky but endearing style, Binet develops the story of Heydrich and the story of the plot to kill him. Authors of similar works are prey to Binet's commentary on their failures as writers and as historians. Yet, through it all, Binet in HHhH compels you forward with his narrative as you become a sideline cheerleader for the two Czechoslovakian assassins.

HHhH (which comes from the German meaning Himmler's brain is Heydrich) is not your average historical fiction. It does require the reader to accept Binet as his guide through the story and, with it, to take whatever diversions Binet wishes you to take. However, historical fiction, at its best, is a story and a story requires a strong voice to tell it. Binet, in this excellent translation, is a voice worth listening to and HHhH is a story that needs to be told. Sit back, strap yourself in, and be prepared for an excellent journey.
30 internautes sur 32 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Glad I read it...but 4 mai 2012
Par Jill Meyer - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
There are many ways to write history and possibly the most tricky is when an author includes himself in the narration. I'm not talking about a memoir, where an author has a place in the history he's writing, but rather when the author makes himself part of the story. It's a technique used by Laurent Binet in his new novel, "HHhH". Written in French, the book is well-translated by Sam Taylor. "HHhH" is the story of the assassination plot of Reinhard Heydrich in Prague, in May, 1942.

Most readers of this review are probably familiar with SS-Obergruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich, born in Halle, Germany, of a musical family, who joined the Nazi party in 1931. A fast-riser within the SS, he served under Heinrich Himmler, and was complicit in almost every event within the party in the 1930's. From the "Night of the Long Knives", to helping to set up "Kristalnacht", to convening the Wannsee Conference in January, 1942, Heydrich found fame - and death - as the "temporary" Reich-protector of Bohemia and Moravia. Sent to Prague to rule as Hitler's minister, he was assassinated after serving there for a year or so. But, he was on the fast-track upwards and history has him as moving on to rule German-occupied France when he was done in Prague.

Binet's "novel" begins with an author (himself?) writing a book on the assassination. He writes about his own background, and about his writing processes. At the same time, he's recounting the story of Heydrich and of the "parachutists" sent into Prague in 1941 to kill Heydrich. "Operation Anthropoid" the plot was called. Begun in London under the auspices of the Czech government-in-exile and British Intelligence. Nine refugees - Czech, Moravian, and Slovakian - were trained in England and then parachuted into the Protectorate to carry out clandestine missions, one of which was to assassinate Heydrich.

The result of author Binet writing a "novel" about Heydrich, the plotters, and a writer who happens to be writing a "novel" about Heydrich, the plotters, etc is a somewhat disingenuous work of writing. I found myself getting impatient with Binet inserting himself (or someone like him) into the story he was writing. I wanted to know more about the plotters, the victim, the times, etc. I suppose I was reading more for history than character development. But Binet's book is actually quite good and I enjoyed reading it. I just couldn't TOTALLY reconcile myself with the self-involvement of the author. I'll be interested to read what other reviewers write about "HHhH". I can recommend it if the reader knows he's getting history with a bit of the author on the side.
25 internautes sur 28 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
The assassins' story (3.5 stars) 1 juin 2012
Par R. S. Wilkerson - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Relié
This is a novel about writing a novel, which is, at the same time, the narrator claims, a history. The narrator/writer intrudes often and becomes imaginatively a part of the story. He reminds the reader so often that the work is not fiction that the reader can never be sure which is which nor how reliable the narrator is. The story ostensibly is about the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, May 27, 1942, but since there is little substantive information about his assassins or about the individual, a turncoat, who for a million marks, turns them into the Nazis, the narrator/writer can only speculate about them as personalities, which means that he is writing fiction despite all of his claims to the contrary. The paucity of information forces the book to be about Heydrich, although the writer/narrator claims it is about the assassins and makes an effort to keep the reader focused on them. He claims that he wants the reader to "know" them, so he mentions often the research that he's done, citing history and fiction, how he has tried to learn the story in intimate detail and put himself into the events so that the reader can experience it.

The narrator/writer claims "The people who took part in this story are not characters. And if they became characters because of me, I don't wish to treat them like that (p. 320)." But he has made them characters; there is in this type of work, no way to avoid it; they are more real as characters in a novel than as stories in a history book. That, of course, is the conscious irony of the work: as characters they have substance. As historical figures "Worn-out by my muddled efforts to salute these people, I tremble with guilt at the thought of all those hundreds, those thousands, whom I have allowed to die in anonymity" (p. 323), they are shadows. I'm not sure that he has achieved the memorial he sought. The history is good; the fiction is good. The narrator/writer protests too much; he's correct in calling his efforts "muddled. Despite the muddling, it's worth reading as fictive history.
10 internautes sur 10 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Who Doesn't Love Killing Nazis? 18 décembre 2012
Par Benny Profane - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
The most important step to enjoying "HHhH," the fantastic debut novel by Laurent Binet, is the same as the most important step for enjoying a plane ride, a scuba dive, or a bondage S&M session: you must trust your partner. "HHhH" is the story of Laurent Binet trying to tell a story of two World War II assassins on a mission to kill a devious Nazi. It's the story of the rise of that devious Nazi (Reinhard Heydrich), the fall of Czechoslovakia, and the birth of the Final Solution. It's a trip through Binet's mind, with all the back alleyways of an old Prague neighborhood and enough asides to tire a reluctant Dutch prince. At once a treatise on historical fiction, a postmodern meditation on the role of an author, and a gripping suspense yarn with one of the simplest of plots (two guys try to kill another dude), "HHhH" is a book you need to pick up and read, like, right now.

In the first few pages Binet admits he doesn't want to condemn our brave assassins to the world of the "vulgar character." But what, Binet asks, is he supposed to do? Should he "...drag this vision around with me all my life without having tried, at least to give it some substance." Throughout the story, Binet grapples with how to best tell this story. Truth be told, I have always been turned off by the hijinks and trickery of meta-fiction. The sort of safety net it provides - I'm playing a joke on the reader but if it doesn't work, perhaps that's part of the joke - is what irritates me, but the fact that Binet comes out and says that he is not embracing meta fiction as much as he is beaten down by it, that this story is as much his as it is his characters - that type of sincerity is rare and invigorating. Yes, Binet will interject himself into the story. In the end, this is a story of a man trying to figure out how to tell a fantastic story without obscuring it with the haze of fiction. You have to trust his vision and just enjoy the ride.

The story begins with the author's first awareness of the plot, charts the rise of Reinhard Heydrich to the top of the insidious SS, and maps out the evolution of the Final Solution - and how much of the Nazis' most monstrous plots seemed to have Heydrich at the center of them. In the beginning, Binet will show his research and erudition, documenting everything known about the beginnings of Heydrich and our two assassins. He will recount anecdotes, discuss the training of the assassins, and where each of the players were at different turns of WWII history. At turns hilarious, informative, and gripping, "HHhH" was really tough for me to put down. One highlight from the author's research for me was a previously unknown story regarding Heydrich's hobby as Luftwaffe pilot, and another with the Ukranian national soccer team.

Some of the criticisms of "HHhH" state that Binet masquerades as a non-fiction book that will from time to time slide back into fictional creation - inventing a scene at Auschwitz, discussing Himmler's reaction to a certain event that he has no historical basis for (then, in a fit of postmodernism, wavers on whether to include said reaction), or how Heydrich feels about Albert Speer - but I believe these criticisms are off base. This is a story of Binet deciding how to tell a story, and though he does invent occasionally throughout the pages it is not a deal breaker for me. However, I was slightly surprised that in parts of this book Binet seems to lambast Jonathan Littell, author of "The Kindly Ones." Binet does not love TKO like I did (as unpublished parts of the manuscript which appeared on The Millions certainly prove), and doesn't believe in the fictional creation of characters in a historical setting. That's what Binet can't handle - he knows that Littell has invented some, and thus he doesn't know what to believe and what not to believe. This has struck some readers as hypocritical, as Binet has done the same thing on a smaller scale - he is still a novelist after all, not a documentarian. Binet says that "creating characters to understand historical fact is like fabricating evidence." Of course, this is where Binet is off base, as Littell is not only trying to understand historical fact but also tell a story of Greek justice, the guilt of a murderous state, and the voice of genocidal perpetrator.

But I am getting off track. As I have said throughout, Binet has written a masterful novel. He has attempted to tell the story of real people, real fighters, real monsters, real murder, real massacres, and to do that he turned them into fiction. "Unfair," Binet writes, "but there you go." And in converting them to fiction, he produced an amazing addition for any literary bookshelf.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?