undrgrnd Cliquez ici NEWNEEEW nav-sa-clothing-shoes Cloud Drive Photos FIFA16 cliquez_ici Rentrée scolaire Shop Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle Paperwhite cliquez_ici Jeux Vidéo Bijoux Montres Montres
House of Darkness House of Light: The True Story Volume One et plus d'un million d'autres livres sont disponibles pour le Kindle d'Amazon. En savoir plus
EUR 32,01
  • Tous les prix incluent la TVA.
Il ne reste plus que 1 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon.
Emballage cadeau disponible.
Quantité :1
House of Darkness House o... a été ajouté à votre Panier
Amazon rachète votre
article EUR 7,49 en chèque-cadeau.
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir les 2 images

House of Darkness House of Light: The True Story (Anglais) Relié – 4 mars 2011

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 32,01
EUR 29,43 EUR 33,83
--Ce texte fait référence à l'édition Broché.

Livres anglais et étrangers
Lisez en version originale. Cliquez ici

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Descriptions du produit

Présentation de l'éditeur

Roger and Carolyn Perron purchased the home of their dreams and eventual nightmares in December of 1970. The Arnold Estate, located just beyond the village of Harrisville, Rhode Island seemed the idyllic setting in which to raise a family. The couple unwittingly moved their five young daughters into the ancient and mysterious farmhouse. Secrets were kept and then revealed within a space shared by mortal and immortal alike. Time suddenly became irrelevant; fractured by spirits making their presence known then dispersing into the ether. The house is a portal to the past and a passage to the future. This is a sacred story of spiritual enlightenment, told some thirty years hence. The family is now somewhat less reticent to divulge a closely-guarded experience. Their odyssey is chronicled by the eldest sibling and is an unabridged account of a supernatural excursion. Ed and Lorraine Warren investigated this haunting in a futile attempt to intervene on their behalf. They consider the Perron family saga to be one of the most compelling and significant of a famously ghost-storied career as paranormal researchers. During a séance gone horribly wrong, they unleashed an unholy hostess; the spirit called Bathsheba . . . a God-forsaken soul. Perceiving herself to be mistress of the house, she did not appreciate the competition. Carolyn had long been under siege; overt threats issued in the form of fire . . . a mother's greatest fear. It transformed the woman in unimaginable ways. After nearly a decade the family left a once beloved home behind though it will never leave them, as each remains haunted by a memory. This tale is an inspiring testament to the resilience of the human spirit on a pathway of discovery: an eternal journey for the living and the dead. --Ce texte fait référence à l'édition Broché .

Biographie de l'auteur

Andrea Perron was born in Rhode Island in 1958. She is a graduate of Chatham College in Pittsburgh, Pa. having earned an inter-disciplinary degree in philosophy and English literature. This memoir waited thirty years to be told, allowing the time and distance necessary for her family to reveal these long held secrets. The author is currently preparing for release of the second volume in this remarkable trilogy. John Shaw created the cover portrait of their farmhouse as a parting gift. Two months after the Perron family abandoned this place in the country, John, all of nineteen years old, drove from Rhode Island to Georgia. He presented his friends with the watercolor; painted from memory, in memory of a special house which touched his life as well. It remains a treasured keepsake. They loved him then as they love him now --Ce texte fait référence à l'édition Broché .

Détails sur le produit

  • Relié: 528 pages
  • Editeur : AuthorHouse (4 mars 2011)
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ISBN-10: 1456747606
  • ISBN-13: 978-1456747602
  • Dimensions du produit: 15,2 x 3,3 x 22,9 cm
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : 4.0 étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (1 commentaire client)
  • Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon: 174.833 en Livres anglais et étrangers (Voir les 100 premiers en Livres anglais et étrangers)
  •  Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?

En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Dans ce livre

(En savoir plus)
Parcourir et rechercher une autre édition de ce livre.
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Couverture | Copyright | Extrait | Quatrième de couverture
Rechercher dans ce livre:

Commentaires en ligne

4.0 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Voir le commentaire client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients

Commentaires client les plus utiles

Par Joanna Atik le 21 août 2014
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
Good but she never speaks about in detail about the work of the Warrens which I found odd
It was a good read but she did float off at times loosing my attention
Remarque sur ce commentaire Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire. Si ce commentaire est inapproprié, dites-le nous.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 366 commentaires
203 internautes sur 224 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Sorry to say--but don't buy this book 22 avril 2013
Par Rae - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
I bought this book after I heard the movie for it was coming out. And I finished it merely because I had paid so much (in Kindle terms) for it. Clearly, the author is a well educated, erudite (one of her favorite words) woman. And clearly the author can write. But, she can't write this story. There is no plot line, no chronology, not clear recounting of events. It's merely a warm up to the main act, which must be--if she writes at this pace, in the last 10 pages of book 3. This is not a ghost story book, this is a philosophical venture with a smattering of "ghostly" incidents strewn through it amongst quotes from authors and philosophers. I'm sorry, but I thought editors would keep such poor writing from being printed. Under no circumstances, believe the review that his is a "page turner". It is not. And if you wanted to write a book on philosophy, do it instead, but don't waste the readers time. And for goodness sake, stop using the word "ether".
85 internautes sur 96 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
How not to write a book 24 juillet 2013
Par Amazon Customer - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché
Count me as a first time reviewer, and this book was so poorly written, I simply had to put my two cents in. I have come to a totally new appreciation for editors and the rest of the staff at professional publishing houses. Andrea writes in one chapter about an incident in 1972. In the next chapter, it's now 1976. Suddenly you're reading about how they'd only been in the house "a couple of months." Huh? What? A story, any story, simply has to flow. This doesn't. It's choppy and takes you all over.

In one chapter she suddenly brings up "Holly." Unfortunately, she doesn't actually introduce the character until several chapters later - it's at that point we find out who this "Holly" person is. There are typos in here, and no, I'm not normally the typo police, but it seems unprofessional. Andrea also writes about the Warrens all the way through the first book, but you don't find out how it is they came to be there or what actually happened until book 2. Had she put things in chronological order, her readers might understand more of what she was trying to convey to us with what the Warrens brought to the story.

Okay, so Andrea gets a dog and names her Bathsheba, then they encounter "Bathsheba" at the house. I kept waiting for her to comment on such a coincidence, but she doesn't. It just seemed natural to me that she would - otherwise why even put it in? She also brings up an incident and writes about it more than once. We got it the first time, thanks! And enough with the "Boo!" It's way overdone.

How many of you want to throttle the mother yourself? After a couple of incidents in the 'burbs, she sees this place, takes every dime out of the bank account and they make the move work. Yet, after her children are frightened, threatened, nearly killed (not to mention what she, herself, was going through), she still keeps her family there, year after year - subjecting them to horrors they still carry.

I have to admit, I skipped over much of the book (especially volume 2), when Andrea starts carrying on about philosophical musings. That's not my cup of tea. I grew up on a haunted farm. There can never be a book that will be able to convey the intense terror, the dread, the heart pounding and the sheer intensity of dealing with something not of this world; but I read these to try and understand, maybe get some insight into what I went through. To be fair, there are some gold nuggets in this book. There just aren't enough to overcome the bad writing. I really, really, really wish I'd read these reviews before purchasing the books.
292 internautes sur 354 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Amityville Called, They'd Like Their Story Back 26 mai 2013
Par WhosYourChubby - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
Update 7/23/2013

Andrea Perron has simultaneously proven both the failure of the American education system and the desperation of Hollywood in these modern times in which they'll slog for years through endless pages of drivel and sophomoric narrative padding in order to tease a semi-coherent and decently scary story out of what would otherwise be nothing more than a prime candidate for both the physical and digital recycle bins. If you can believe it, self-proclaimed "author," Andrea, actually holds an inter-disciplinary degree in philosophy and English literature from Chatham College in Pittsburgh, PA. Meaning that she actually went to school, spent the time, and paid a whole bunch of money to learn about English literature, and still produced these "novels." I don't know whether to laugh at or cry for her.

Now having seen the movie, I can safely say that everything I wrote in my review is absolutely, completely and 100% justified; besides the names, they didn't use a single line or event from the book in the movie, much to the moviegoers' delight, I'm sure. As the "Warrens," played by Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga (who are a bajillion times more sane, logical and sympathetic than the Warrens are in real life), explain in the movie, ghosts are not able to possess people. Only demons can do that. This means that the only ghost they kept from the book, Bathsheba, is now a demon and no longer a ghost. Surprise, surprise.

To the person who said that the movie was going to be different because it was from the "Warren Files," and more from their point of view, let me just say how funny it is that the Warrens just happened to skip over the part in the book (in Vol. 2) where the husband physically threw them out of the house and refused to let them back in and how the story, according to the movie, is now about how the Warrens have super powers and save the day sans capes and spandex.

If you've come here after seeing the movie looking for more details about what happened in Harrisville, save your money and turn back while you can. This book has nothing to do with the movie at all (which is why the movie is so good), and will do nothing but give you a literary migraine.

Original Review:
Let me begin my diatribe, if you'll indulge me, fair reader, with a disturbing trend I've noticed in the reviews on this book. Almost all of the people who gave it a 5 star rating, or even a slightly positive review, are from or around the town the book is written in, Harrisville, Rhode Island. Apparently these people are desperate for some vicarious fame by association with the town this dreadfully written book takes place in. Read them with a grain of salt. If you're looking for an honest review from someone who is not skeptical of the supernatural, just critical of this, and I use the term loosely, "author's" work, then please read on for a detailed, unbiased review.

I think the reason it took Andrea 30 years to write this book was that she needed to read "The Amityville Horror", "The Devil in Connecticut" and "In a Dark Place: The Story of a True Haunting" a few times so she could steal as much of their stories as possible for her own. She also needed time to wait for Poltergeist, Burnt Offerings and the Exorcist to come out on DVD so she could watch them all a few times (and their special features!) for some new ideas. This book is nothing but a derivative retelling of better, scarier ghost stories. All she did was put her own family into the roles of other, more interesting characters; your basic "fanfic," if you will. The funny part is, I could have lived with that if not for the horrible writing. A good story is a good story, even if the general theme has told before. But even a great story loses its gravitas and poignancy when told by a seven year old, which is about Andrea's level of writing. Well, to be fair, it's more like a seven year old who knows how to press Shift+F7 in Word and come up with bigger words to use from the list of synonyms, but who then overlooks the green squiggles of the Grammar Check function. She also entertained the infamous nutbags, Ed and Lorraine Warren. All you have to do is a quick Google search on them and you will find out how untrustworthy these two are. Being they also worked on the Amityville case and the two Connecticut cases, I can see why this story features all of their greatest hits: who could forget the classic, "It must be a DEMON," or "The spirit is mocking the Holy Trinity," and the ever delightful, "Of course we have no proof of ANYTHING, you're supposed to just believe whatever we say!" Could it be mere coincidence that Harrisville reeks of the same pseudo-religious, quasi-supernatural hokum featured in Amityville and Connecticut? I think not!

Let's start with Andrea's grammar and punctuation. She loves to put about 3 bold words on each page as she thinks the reader is too dumb to get the meaning of what she is trying to tell us. You know when an airheaded teenage girl gets upset and overemphasizes a word to show she's really upset? That's what I feel like she's doing. "But `Moooooooom' there's like `totally' a ghost and it's really `scary.'" There's no good reason to emphasize words like that. If you put the word there, trust us, as the readers, to be able to know how that word is supposed to work with the rest of them to convey the idea your describing in that sentence. She constantly insults our collective intelligence. For example, she feels she has to emphasize the fact that during an argument over money that someone is feeling "angry."

She also likes to tell us what everyone was "feeling" for 3 or more pages without describing the actual event that caused the upset. If you are lucky, she will tell you a few chapters later and then she rehashes the 3 pages again of what everyone was "feeling." It reminded me of when your teacher wants you to write a 500 word essay. Like an underachieving, lazy student, most of the book is just filling space. At one point she describes in painfully overblown details of her Mother's meltdown in the kitchen over her husband killing flies, ala Amityville Horror. She then copied and pasted the same story later on in the book hoping the reader would not remember she already told this story. She did this a few times. Maybe she never went back and read over what she wrote. It was painful enough for me to read once, so I can't imagine what torture she was facing having to re-read it as the author.

Apparently desperate to show that she has some grasp of what colons and semi-colons are Andrea doesn't hesitate to use them at every possible turn. Ironically, she doesn't use them correctly. She loves to do stuff like this: "The mother had a bad feeling; a dread she felt." A little redundant, am I right? Half the time those little add-on's are just terrible, as in, "...; an angelic angel." Keep your sanity and just skip over anything immediately to the right of any colon or semicolon. What this book really needs is a, "colonoscopy." (Cue rimshot) You thought that was a terrible pun? Just you wait; Andrea's got a metric ton of them waiting for you! Like, "They did not stand a ghost of a chance with the ghosts in the house!" Also, I think Andrea suffers from multiple personality disorder. I mean, what else could possibly explain her tendency to switch back and forth from the third person narrative to the second person and back to the third every few pages?

In all honesty, I would have never finished this book if I had not paid money for it. You will find that skipping long monologues of pure, unadulterated "feeling" will help you to read the book faster. I think she fancies herself the next Steven King and thinks that if she puts as many words on a page as he does, she'll be just as critically acclaimed.

Now before you say, "Oh, he is a skeptic and a non-believer, which is why he is so mean about all this," that is just not true. I do believe in ghosts and have lived in 2 houses that had ghosts, one who made me uncomfortable enough to the point I did move out. I won't directly say that her book is full of lies, (libel laws and all that), but I think it is strange that all the Warren cases tell the same story: A family moves into a dream house, it turns out to be haunted, the father will not believe it until the very end, Lorraine Warren kicks open the front door and starts yelling about demons and then everyone gets a nice, lucrative movie deal out of it. By the way, "The Conjuring," based on The Warren Files concerning this case, is coming this summer to a theater near you! And even if it was real, what kind of mother would subject her 5 kids to this kind of thing for 10 year? Yes, 10 YEARS!!

So to spare you the terror of trying to read this book, I'll summarize it for you: Estrogen soaked family pester their absentee salesman father to throw all of their money into a farm they don't really need and that the owner is super desperate to offload on them. After ignoring this first warning sign, the family can't get warm in a 200 year old house in Rhode Island during winter (umm... duh?) and keep smelling death in certain rooms. After ignoring this second warning sign, the mother is attacked by the ghost of Joan Crawford (think wire hangers), the kids start seeing creepy stuff and the doors very politely open themselves. Flies gather in the house where the kids keep sandwiches under the bed (shocking!) and then the mother has a nightmare and claws up her husband who is apparently a very sound sleeper. After trying to set herself on fire several times, the mother spirals into a generic supernatural obsession (cue the montage of Mom in the local library discovering the evil history of the house), and ropes everyone she possibly can into it, culminating with the arrival of the Warrens who proceed to add a few Mentos to the mom's glass of crazy, which happens to taste a lot like diet soda. Add in some levitating beds, telepathic crows, self-sweeping brooms and other fun things, and you've got a recipe for a good kind of crazy that is seriously hampered by the author's grievous lack of an editor.
21 internautes sur 23 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Take writing lessons and use a book doctor 31 juillet 2013
Par Amanda Custer - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
With all due respect to Andrea Perron's friends who gave her books 5 stars, this author is clueless about the fundamentals of novel writing. While I have no doubt she writes respectable poetry and that skill can come in useful in novelizing stories, she's ignored all the rules. When I first started reading book one, I wondered if it had been written in the nineteenth century as writing then was as florid as this one, then I saw the word s--- and realized it was modern. I later wondered if it was self-published as no self-respecting publishing house would have allowed this to go to print and Lo. And behold! It was. (Just imitating Ms. Perron) First rule of writing prose: Show, don't tell. Descriptiveness is needed, of course, to set the scene, describe reactions etc, but philosophy should be conveyed through conversations or thoughts of the characters, not lectured endlessly over and over by an unintroduced narrator. Rule two: Devise a timeline for the story and keep to it. Even stories that use a lot of flashbacks keep the story on track. Then at the end you may draw conclusions such as the link between science and spiritualism and philosophize as Ms. Perron did. Not keeping on track confuses the reader. Who is that? Did I miss the introduction of that character? Rules three, four and five: edit, edit, edit. The best authors tell of having massive sections either cut or rearranged for better flow of the story. This book reads as though Ms. Perron reminisced into a tape recorder then transcribed it and sent it to her vanity publisher without reading it or checking for the frequent spelling errors and poor sentence structures, such as writing `sites' instead of `cites'. Also her own personal version of "Duh, yeah" was "Boo! Who!" endlessly used toward the end of the book and there were many, many other repetitions of phrases and cliches. I probably skipped over endless pages trying to mine the gold out of the bottomless pit of mud. I found the basic story interesting, but it wasn't worth the time and effort to try to piece it together. The biggest irritation to me is the way she dropped Mr. Kenyon the original owner of the house. Didn't anybody bother to go ask him what he did to cope with the ghosts? No get-togethers were described after the family moved in. I really don't recommend this book. Andrea Perron should have hired a "book doctor".
19 internautes sur 23 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Recommended for book clubs...but only those that like to play drinking games. 6 août 2013
Par M.K. - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
This book was rough, guys. Real rough. If you haven't bought it yet, save your money.

Like many other reviewers, I wanted to find out the back ghost story behind The Conjuring. After pushing through Volume One of the trilogy (three books...why?!) I am no closer to understanding anything at all about what allegedly happened in a remote, centuries-old farmhouse in Rhode Island. Ms. Perron opted out of using an editor, went the self-published route, and chose to tell her story, her way.

Except in 500 pages she never tells a story. She goes a different route.

She fills page upon page with pseudo-intellectual blathering about the spiritual and philosophical meanings behind haunted happenings in her house without first explaining what the haunted happenings are. She casually name-drops characters she's never introduced and muses about events she's never described. She fails to build drama or even a solid narrative, or follow the least bit of a cohesive timeline. And, she repeats herself over again and repeats herself over again. Annoying, isn't it?

Ms. Perron handily dismantles the proper use of semi-colons in such sentences as: "Cynthia was the first to make contact; physical with metaphysical contact." And she is heavy-handed with interjections such as "Boo!" and "Amen!" These will pop up frequently and at the worst times--like just when she starts getting into some spooky happenings with the family's telephone...but instead of going into details about a phantom ringing telephone, she opts to write: "Boo! Who is it? Who's there? Can you hear me now?" Which reminds me that Ms. Perron frequently gets cutesy and self-indulges some spectacularly bad puns. Again, referring to ghosts using the family phone: "The line was dead." Or when speaking about the alleged witch Bathsheba: "Witch way did she go?" Her metaphors aren't much better: "She was omnipresent...like God."

Again, I wanted to like this book. I enjoy a good spine-tingling ghost story, but--just so I am clear here--this isn't one. It's barely even legible. I had a hard time finishing this book--not because I have literacy problems, but because I kept getting so mad at the terrible writing that I kept throwing the book off my porch and my dog would run off with it and (rightly so) try to tear it to shreds.

I believe that Ms. Perron wrote this book primarily for her family and friends, who already know the people and the events, and so the author can't be bothered to fill any outsiders in on the pesky details. So, for the rest of us who are not part of the Perron clan and who already shelled out good money for this book, I have a recommendation. I would recommend this book for those in book clubs, but not for the reason you think. This selection would be great for those clubs that are really groups of women and/or men who like to get together once a week to "read" books, aka, drink wine. So, for all of my fellow drinkers--I mean, readers--this book is for you. Simply take turns reading a passage aloud. Everyone takes a sip when they hear the phrases "let there be Light" and "a house alive with death."

Bonus round for those who don't have to drive themselves home after book club: take a shot every time you hear the words "ether" or "click!" or the phrase "the new paranormal" or "this house smells like death."

If you are not currently in a book club, or just prefer to drink and read in the privacy of your own home/car/office/bathroom stall, try the play-at-home version. Simply take a sip every time you see a semi-colon used incorrectly. Trust me, this book will get you to happy drunk town quickly.

P.S. Interestingly, I just read that the author was an English major who both studied and wrote poetry. How convenient, then, that the evil spirit who speaks to the family does so in rhyming couplets: "Will drive ye mad with doom and gloom. Will drive ye into Satan's tomb."
Bathsheba sounds a little like Barbossa from Pirates of the Caribbean? Arr.

Thanks for reading my review!
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?