undrgrnd Cliquez ici Toys NEWNEEEW nav-sa-clothing-shoes nav-sa-clothing-shoes Cloud Drive Photos cliquez_ici Rentrée scolaire Cliquez ici Acheter Fire Shop Kindle Paperwhite cliquez_ici Jeux Vidéo Bijoux Marsala Bijoux Montres bijoux Fantaisie
Amazon Premium
Commencez à lire How Jesus Became God sur votre Kindle dans moins d'une minute. Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici Ou commencez à lire dès maintenant avec l'une de nos applications de lecture Kindle gratuites.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil


Essai gratuit

Découvrez gratuitement un extrait de ce titre

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Désolé, cet article n'est pas disponible en
Image non disponible pour la
couleur :
Image non disponible

How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee [Format Kindle]

Bart D. Ehrman
5.0 étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (2 commentaires client)

Prix conseillé : EUR 19,14 De quoi s'agit-il ?
Prix éditeur - format imprimé : EUR 15,09
Prix Kindle : EUR 10,43 TTC & envoi gratuit via réseau sans fil par Amazon Whispernet
Économisez : EUR 4,66 (31%)

App de lecture Kindle gratuite Tout le monde peut lire les livres Kindle, même sans un appareil Kindle, grâce à l'appli Kindle GRATUITE pour les smartphones, les tablettes et les ordinateurs.

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre adresse e-mail ou numéro de téléphone mobile.


Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 10,43  
Relié EUR 26,34  
Broché EUR 15,08  
CD, Livre audio, CD EUR 41,94  

Les clients ayant acheté cet article ont également acheté

Cette fonction d'achat continuera à charger les articles. Pour naviguer hors de ce carrousel, veuillez utiliser votre touche de raccourci d'en-tête pour naviguer vers l'en-tête précédente ou suivante.

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

HOW JESUS BECAME GOD makes the most astonishing and complex topic in the history of Christianity accessible to every reader, and offers a clear and balanced discussion of how various Christians–and non- Christians-see Jesus. (Elaine Pagels, professor of religion at Princeton University and author of The Gnostic Gospels)

“ In this lively and provocative book, Ehrman gives a nuanced and wide-ranging discussion of early Christian Christology. Tracing the developing understanding of Jesus, Ehrman shows his skills as an interpreter of both biblical and nonbiblical texts. This is an important, accessible work by a scholar of the first rank.” (Michael Coogan, Harvard Divinity School lecturer and editor of The New Oxford Annotated Bible)

“Ehrman writes with vigor and clarity, but above all with intellectual honesty.He demystifies a subject on which biblical scholars too often equivocate. Bothbelievers and non-believers can learn much from this book.” (John J. Collins, Holmes Professor of Old Testament at Yale)

“This careful book starts where the ‘historical Jesus’ accounts ends and lays outhow this absorbing story continued for centuries. Candid and direct, it unfoldswhat often seem to be the unnecessarily complicated controversies that dividedearly Christians in a fair and understandable manner.” (Harvey Cox, Hollis Research Professor of Divinity at Harvard)

“How did ancient monotheism allow the One God to have a ‘son’? Bart Ehrman tells this story, introducing the reader to a Jewish world thick with angels, cosmic powers, and numberless semi-divinities. How Jesus Became God provides a lively overview of Nicea’s prequel.” (Paula Fredriksen, Distinguished Visiting Professor at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, and author of Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews)

“Ehrman writes very personally, especially in the beginning, and this approach draws the reader into a subject that is littered with curves and contradictions... This fascinating discussion will engage—and provoke—a wide audience.” (Booklist)

“Ehrman’s book raises questions that should interest us all... [and] represents a genuine conversation among informed scholars.” (Christian Century)

“Bart Ehrman has made a career of zeroing in on some of the most difficult questions at the intersection of faith and history.” (Boston Globe)

Présentation de l'éditeur

New York Times bestselling author and Bible expert Bart Ehrman reveals how Jesus’s divinity became dogma in the first few centuries of the early church.

The claim at the heart of the Christian faith is that Jesus of Nazareth was, and is, God. But this is not what the original disciples believed during Jesus’s lifetime—and it is not what Jesus claimed about himself. How Jesus Became God tells the story of an idea that shaped Christianity, and of the evolution of a belief that looked very different in the fourth century than it did in the first.

A master explainer of Christian history, texts, and traditions, Ehrman reveals how an apocalyptic prophet from the backwaters of rural Galilee crucified for crimes against the state came to be thought of as equal with the one God Almighty, Creator of all things. But how did he move from being a Jewish prophet to being God? In a book that took eight years to research and write, Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection. Only when some of Jesus’s followers had visions of him after his death—alive again—did anyone come to think that he, the prophet from Galilee, had become God. And what they meant by that was not at all what people mean today.

Written for secular historians of religion and believers alike, How Jesus Became God will engage anyone interested in the historical developments that led to the affirmation at the heart of Christianity: Jesus was, and is, God.

Détails sur le produit

En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Commentaires en ligne

4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
5.0 étoiles sur 5
5.0 étoiles sur 5
Commentaires client les plus utiles
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Format:Broché|Achat vérifié
Un ouvrage de lecture aisée sur des sujets complexe. Une thèse ferme mais une attitude intellectuelle ouverte de l'auteur. Un excellent ouvrage d'initiation au christianisme primitif et à l'histoire du N ou eau Testament.
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ?
2 internautes sur 3 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Attention à l'arnaque ! 27 mars 2014
Format:Format Kindle
Un certain Michael Bird a fait paraître une "réfutation" du livre d'Ehrman avec un titre et une couverture très semblable. Ne tombez pas dans le panneau !
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ?
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.2 étoiles sur 5  366 commentaires
456 internautes sur 503 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 This Book Shoudn't Be Ignored! 27 mars 2014
Par John W. Loftus - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat vérifié
In this book Bart Ehrman attempts to provide the theological road-map whereby Jesus started out as a Jewish apocalyptic prophet and ended up having the high Christology of the historic Nicaea Creed (solidified by the Council of Constantinople in 381). As a historian he does not believe Jesus was God in any sense, or that he arose from the dead. He's merely being a historian telling us what he thinks is more probable than not.

In Ehrman's previous works he has argued that Jesus was an apocalyptic prophet who predicted the end of the known world and the coming of the Son of Man in his generation who would subsequently rule over the re-created world. Most scholars seem to agree with Ehrman, but others disagree with this view of Jesus, most notably Geza Vermes, Burton Mack, Marcus Borg, John Dominic Crossan, Stephen Patterson, Bruce Chilton, John P. Meier, Gerd Thiessen, Elisabeth Fiorenza, S. G. F. Brandon, Morton Smith, Reza Aslan, along with mythicist scholars Richard Carrier and Robert M. Price. Some of these different views of Jesus would require a different road-map to get to the high Christology of the fourth century, especially the mythicist view. So from the very beginning as we travel this map there are these obstacles.

Passing over those disagreements though, Ehrman's map seems to me to be a fairly standard mainline one which I've read in other works. Michael Coogan, John Collins and Paula Fredriksen probably agree with Ehrman since they wrote blurbs for it. Robert Funk, the founder of the Jesus Seminar, in the last chapter of his book "Honest to Jesus," says some of the same things.

Regardless, I'm very glad Ehrman wrote it. It's written so that the general populace can understand it. He has a way of communicating these ideas very well. Included are personal stories that may help readers know more about him as he considered this road-map in the first place. Several times he tells the reader he didn't at first agree with this or that idea, only to embrace it later. He describes himself as an "agnostic" now (p. 354).

In this brief review I've decided to tell readers a bit about how he argues so people can decide for themselves whether to buy it or not. My 5 star recommendation is based on his knowledge, communication skills and the fact that his views should be dealt with. In other words, this book shouldn't be ignored. It will be discussed in the years to come. Already there is one book length response by conservative Christians.

In the first chapter Ehrman tells us there were several divine humans believed to exist in ancient Greece and Rome. There was Apollonius, whom he goes in some depth about since his life parallels the life of Jesus. Then he tells us of gods who became human, like Philemon and Baucis (cf. Acts 14:11). There are divine beings believed to be born of both a god and a mortal, like Alexander the Great and Hercules. There are even humans believed to be divine, like Romulus, Quirinus, Julius Caesar and Caesar Augustus.

Ehrman shows us there were lots of gods, and that according to the beliefs in those early first century days "they were graded levels of divinity" (p. 39). This was a new thought to him, as it is to me. One can construct this as a divine pyramid with one great god at the top tier (according to some beliefs) and several tiers below, all of which were inhabited by divine beings. Just below the top tier were the great gods within each pantheon, then below that tier many other local gods and goddesses. At a still lower level were the demonic beings. On the lowest level were believed to be divine humans (perhaps demigods if you will).

In the second chapter Ehrman shows there were possibly divine humans in ancient Judaism. The first commandment, after all, doesn't deny other gods existed, only that the Israelites were to worship Yahweh. There were the Nephilim of Genesis 6, offspring of the sons of god who had sex with the daughters of men. The "Angel of the Lord" was believed to be a divine human being, as were kings, (Psalm 82) and angels ("the Watchers"). There was Daniel's "son of Man," and divine hypostases (an attribute of God that takes on its own essence) like Wisdom itself. Ehrman argues that given these traditions it wouldn't be that much of a stretch to think of Jesus in the same terms as divine. We see it especially in the Gospel of John who described the pre-incarnate Jesus as the "Word" that became flesh (i.e., Logos).

In chapter three Ehrman argues that Jesus thought of himself to be the Messiah, but he did not claim to be God. Ehrman thinks when Judas betrayed Jesus he also told the authorities Jesus was claiming to be the Messiah. After all, that was what he was accused of, claiming to be the king of the Jews, and what he had to deny at his trials if he wanted to escape death on the cross. After Jesus died we find his Jewish disciples proclaiming he was the Messiah, even though "no Jew before Christianity" thought of a dying Messiah. Says Ehrman, "The only plausible explanation is that they called Jesus this after his death because they were calling him this before his death."

In chapter four Ehrman provides good strong reasons why Jesus did not rise from the dead using the tools of the historian, which are the only reliable tools we have at our disposal. If those tools cannot do the job then it cannot be done at all (faith has no method, correct?). In chapter five Ehrman tells us what historians can know. They can know that some of Jesus' followers believed he arose from the dead due to visions of him after his crucifixion, and that "this belief led them to reevaluate who Jesus was, so that the Jewish apocalyptic preacher from rural Galilee came to be considered, in some sense, God." (p. 174). His disciples concluded that Jesus was exalted to heaven. God had taken him into the heavenly realm "to a position of virtually unheard-of status and authority." (p. 205). "Jesus now had been exalted to heaven and is the heavenly messiah to come to earth. In an even more real sense, he was God. Not God almighty, of course, but he was a heavenly being, a superhuman, a divine king, who would rule the nations" (p. 208).

Ehrman calls this "exaltation Christology" and it took hold early on in the minds of his disciples. "It was because of his exalted status that Jesus was deemed worthy of worship" (p. 235). When Mark, the first Gospel was written, we read that Jesus was God's Son at his baptism. Later gospels kept placing his divinity further back in time. Jesus was believed to be divine at birth in Luke. The gospel of John, written last, says the Logos that became flesh was always divine. The Logos became incarnate in Jesus. Paul's conception of Jesus shares that of the gospel of John whereby we see an "incarnational Christology." It surely developed from exaltation Christology quicker in the mind of Paul than others, but that's how it developed for them all, Ehrman seems to say.

By the time of the fourth century "many of the great thinkers of the Roman world had come to believe that a huge chasm separated the divine and human realms. God was 'up there' and was the Almighty. He alone was God." (p. 43) Gone was the pyramid of gods. So Ehrman argues, "One of the mistakes that people make when thinking about the question of Jesus as God involves taking the view that eventually was widely held by the fourth Christian century and assuming that this was in place during the early days of the Christian movement." "Jesus became God in that major fourth-century sense. But he had been seen as God before that, by people who did not have this fourth-century understanding of the relationship of the human and divine realms" (pp. 43-44).

While there were plenty of controversies in the first few centuries over the precise nature of this Christology and how Jesus could be God that were not settled quickly, even at Nicaea, and continue today, Ehrman goes on to show the important role of Constantine in this debate by favoring Christianity over all other religions, especially Judaism, and even the council of Nicaea against other Christianities.
194 internautes sur 217 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Bold and Brilliant... Bravo, Bart! 2 avril 2014
Par Hecademus - Publié sur Amazon.com
This work is beyond fantastic!

Not only does Bart deliver a tight and well-reasoned argument for when, how, and why Jesus came to be thought of as divine by his earliest followers, he does so in a way that is deeply sympathetic to Christianity and believers alike. While Bart candidly discloses his own disbelief in the divinity of Jesus and the general Christian position, he constantly engages the reader/listener (Audible) with his own ongoing development since his early days as a fundamentalist believer, often with honest and incisive self-reflections as to how he continues to refine his position with different approaches to the evidence.

And yet—even given this apparently unbridgeable chasm between Bart and the Christian faithful—his love for the subject, period, and texts shines through without a doubt. I often read comments directed at Bart by Christian believers to the effect of, "Why do you spend so much time studying Christianity and teaching about it if you *hate* it so much?" Or, "If you're an agnostic, then why do you waste your time debating about Jesus?"

While these kind of questions and comments betray a total lack of intellectual rigor, they all rest on a fundamental misconception: that you're unable to love a subject and yet disagree with central tenets of that subject as it is commonly understood. It's clear that Bart unabashedly loves the intricacies of how and why Christianity came to dominate the West, and his labor in the area has helped to illuminate much of this material for us, his popular audience.

And here's the real genius of this book: this book presents the culmination and epitome of Bart's scholarly career in the context of THE CENTRAL QUESTION of the Western world. The fact that Jesus came to be thought of as God (albeit in a variety of ways) is the linchpin for the entire development of the Western world, especially since the 4th century CE. Bart's previous works may focus on one or another topic within Christian history—even tackling the actual existence of the Historical Jesus—but How Jesus Became God delivers a full, contextual, scholarly understanding of how this historical personality came to dominate the Western imagination as the God of the universe, leading to the Western world as we know it.

I give this book 5 stars, 2 thumbs up, and a full endorsement. As someone who holds degrees is History, Philosophy, and Biblical Studies, I can honestly say that Bart's approach is tightly reasoned, carefully argued, and most of all it is FUN READING, a real page-turner. Everyone interested in Christianity and Christian history should plan to read this book. It's certain to spur commotion, disagreements, and debates, but—most importantly!—it'll get people thinking about modern scholarship and its implications for historical positions of faith.


While Bart personally disagrees with the theological claims of Christianity, he's adamant that he's not arguing his thesis as a theologian but as a historian. And one thing is clear: Jesus *becoming* God in the minds of his followers was a historical development, just as history can show us groups of early Christians who never came to affirm this position.

AND modern believers can still retain their theological beliefs about the nature of Jesus (whatever those beliefs may be)! But understanding how those beliefs came to be and change through the early centuries of Christianity is important for illuminating those theological beliefs. Anyone who believes that Jesus is God—ancient or modern—*came* to believe that at some point through some kind of historical development. Bart's analysis argues how the first believers came to believe this, why they did so, and in what (multiple) senses they considered it to be true.

Well done! :o)
110 internautes sur 129 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Another excellent book from a fine scholar. 23 avril 2014
Par Anne Rice - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat vérifié
I'm thankful we have Ehrman. I don't know of any bible scholar who is more humble, polite and patient in putting forth his views, who takes more time and patience than Ehrman to offer a perspective on a question. This book is a joy to read. I'm finding one brilliant insight after another. ------ Ehrman does a marvelous job of bridging the gap between the popular reader (people like me who study on their own) and the latest thinking of the finest biblical scholars (skeptics and believers) in the academic world --- as he offers his own informed and documented findings and opinions. Just a wonderful book. ----- Years ago I read a great deal of skeptical biblical scholarship that disappointed and offended me. Some of it came across as pompous, some of it snide, much of it unsound, and a lot of it came across as fanciful and utterly uncontrolled, filled with alternative "theories" about Jesus, the gospels, the origins of Christianity, etc. It really was some of the poorest scholarship I'd ever read in any field. ----- But Ehrman's scholarship simply doesn't fall into that category. He does not run rampant with wild speculation. He talks about the text, the text, always the text and what the text is telling us, and what kind of problems and questions we face when -- say-- the text of Paul offers one point of view on the nature of Jesus and the text of the Fourth Gospel offers another. But I'm just scratching the surface here with this example. I'm trying to describe why I trust Ehrman on this topic, and why I look forward to his books, and why my personal experience as a reader with this book is so pleasurable. Ehrman is an honest scholar, an ethical and careful scholar, and I recommend this book highly to everyone. It has much to offer the believer and the skeptic, much to offer anyone who is obsessed with the mysteries surrounding Jesus Christ as I am. It's a terrific book!
311 internautes sur 387 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 Notable for what Ehrman gets right as well as what he gets wrong 29 mars 2014
Par Robert M. Bowman Jr. - Publié sur Amazon.com
Bart Ehrman’s book _How Jesus Became God_ is the most recent example of a scholarly tradition of books offering to explain how Christianity turned a simple itinerant Jewish teacher into the Second Person of the Trinity. Already the skeptics are giving the book obviously partisan five-star reviews. Rather than engage in book review “star wars” by giving the book only one star I am giving it three stars, even though as a biblical scholar of an evangelical Christian point of view I strongly disagree with the thesis of the book.

Ehrman’s thesis is that Jesus was not viewed, by himself or his disciples, as in any sense divine during his lifetime, but that belief in his divinity arose almost immediately after his disciples had visions of Jesus that they interpreted as meaning that God had raised him bodily from the dead. According to Ehrman, the earliest Christians thought Jesus had been exalted by God to a divine status at his resurrection, but this belief quickly morphed, resulting in the idea that Jesus was God incarnate. The premise of his argument is that the category of divinity was an elastic one in the ancient world, even to some extent in Jewish thought, and so first-century Christians were able to entertain quite different conceptions of what it meant to regard Jesus as divine or even as “God” (a point Ehrman elaborates in two chapters, 11-84).

Having laid the foundation, Ehrman builds the house of his theory of Christian origins. Jesus was an apocalyptic preacher who mistakenly thought the end of the age was imminent and who hoped he would become the Messiah (a merely earthly king) in the impending age to come (86-127). Instead, he was executed by crucifixion and his body was probably not even given a decent burial, contrary to the Gospels (133-65). However, a few of Jesus’ disciples who had fled to Galilee had some visions of Jesus, perhaps of the type people sometimes have when they are bereaved (174-206). The disciples interpreted these visions almost immediately as meaning that Jesus had risen from the dead to an exalted, divine status in heaven as God’s adopted “son” next to God himself. Ehrman finds this earliest “exaltation Christology,” dating from the early 30s, in preliterary creedal statements imbedded in Paul (Rom. 1:3-4) and Acts (2:36; 5:31; 13:32-33), even though he recognizes that neither Paul nor Luke held to this view (216-35).

Ehrman thinks this exaltation Christology developed with extreme rapidity into what is the more recognizable view of Christ. By the 40s or at the latest the 50s, some Christians thought Jesus had become God’s Son at his baptism or at his birth, while others, such as Paul, thought Jesus was God’s Son even before his human life, serving as God’s chief angel (240-69). This angelic incarnation Christology was developed before the end of the century into the idea of Jesus as God incarnate, seen especially in John and Colossians, which Ehrman denies Paul wrote (269-80). Christian leaders of the second and third centuries hardened this incarnation Christology into a standard of orthodoxy, rejecting Christologies of their day akin to those of the earliest Christians attested in various parts of the New Testament. This process of defining orthodoxy and condemning heresy eventually led to the formulation of the doctrine of the Trinity and its codification in the creeds of the fourth and fifth centuries (284-352).

As I see it, Ehrman gets a surprising number of things right. Jesus was a real historical person. The New Testament Gospels are our best source of information about that person. Jesus was crucified at the order of Pontius Pilate and died on the cross. Some of Jesus’ original followers sincerely believed not long afterward that they saw Jesus alive from the dead. Already, we’ve eliminated about 90 percent of the nonsense we so often hear from skeptics about Jesus, and we’re not done yet. Ehrman agrees that the earliest Christians regarded Jesus as in some sense divine and that within about twenty years, even before Paul, at least some Jewish Christians believed that Jesus was a preexistent divine being. (Skeptics usually try to blame this idea on Paul.) The belief that Jesus existed before creation as God (and yet not God the Father) arose even before the Gospel of John. One could hardly wish for more agreements and even concessions from the world’s most influential agnostic biblical scholar.

Having given credit where credit is due, I must move on to identify what I think are some of the weakest links in Ehrman’s argument. For sake of brevity I limit the list to five.

1. Ehrman’s foundational premise of the fluidity of ancient concepts of the divine is certainly a major problem. Ehrman rightly finds such fluidity in Greco-Roman thought, but what he never addresses even once is the consistent, pervasive opposition to Greco-Roman notions of the divine throughout the New Testament—even when he touches on obviously relevant passages. For example, Ehrman discusses the tale of Jupiter and Mercury (or Zeus and Hermes) visiting Phrygia (19-22), commenting on the incident reported in Acts when Barnabas and Paul preached in Phrygia and were mistaken for Zeus and Hermes (Acts 14:8-18). But Ehrman glosses over Paul’s response to the Phrygians, in which he summoned them to turn from their idolatrous beliefs to accept the God of Jewish monotheism (Acts 14:15-17). Generalizations about “divine humans” in antiquity are simply irrelevant to understanding the origins of a monotheistic Jewish movement that regarded its crucified human founder as God.

Ehrman presents three models of the divine human in Greco-Roman culture: “gods who temporarily become human” (19-22), “divine beings born of a god and a mortal” (22-24), and “a human who becomes divine” (25-38). He admits that the case of Jesus does not fit any of these: “I don’t know of any other cases in ancient Greek or Roman thought of this kind of ‘god-man,’ where an already existing divine being is said to be born of a mortal woman” (18). He could have added to that sentence, “or Jewish thought.” This is the Achilles’ heel of Ehrman’s whole account of Christian origins. By his own admission, the Christian view of Jesus—a view he admits emerged within twenty years of Jesus’ crucifixion—was literally unprecedented.

2. Ehrman’s main thesis on its face appears completely lacking in credibility. According to Ehrman, whereas Jesus did not view himself as anything more than a man and did not expect to become anything more than a glorious earthly king, within a few weeks or months of Jesus’ death his original followers were sincerely proclaiming that Jesus was a divine figure ruling over all creation at God’s right hand in heaven. Apparently Jesus’ original disciples, who had walked all over Galilee and Judea with him and listened to him teach for hours on end, simply discounted Jesus’ own self-image as nothing more than the future human Messiah.

3. To make his theory work, Ehrman has abandoned his earlier view that the burial of Jesus in a tomb just outside Jerusalem was historically likely. He now accepts something like John Dominic Crossan’s view that Jesus received no decent burial at all. In a way, denying the tomb is a smart move on Ehrman’s part. As long as he acknowledged both the tomb and the appearances, he remained vulnerable to the vise grip of the historical argument for the Resurrection. So Ehrman, who knows he cannot deny that at least some of the disciples had experiences in which they thought they saw Jesus alive from the dead, has gone the more sensible skeptical route and questioned the burial in the tomb. But this move, while sensible enough from his agnostic perspective, lands him in evidential hot water, because the evidence that the Gospels are telling the truth about the empty tomb is very good. Craig Evans, in his chapter in the book _How God Became Jesus_ that responds to Ehrman’s book, does an excellent job of critiquing Ehrman on this point.

4. Ehrman’s attempts to explain the appearances of Jesus naturalistically ignore entirely the testimony of the apostle Paul that Jesus had appeared to him when Paul was still a persecutor of Christians. Ehrman quietly omits any mention of Paul’s experience throughout his treatment of the resurrection appearances in the fifth chapter of his book. Then, having finished with the subject of Jesus’ resurrection, at the beginning of chapter 6 Ehrman says only that Paul, after converting to faith in Jesus, “later claimed that this was because he had had a vision of Jesus alive, long after his death” (214, emphasis added). That is all he says—and it is difficult even to take his statement seriously. That Paul sincerely thought he had a vision of the risen Christ is really beyond debate. That fact is a stubborn datum that Ehrman failed to incorporate into his account of the origins of the Christian movement.

5. Ehrman labors to defend the premise that the apostle Paul thought Jesus was the chief angel come in the flesh. He has one proof text for this claim—Galatians 4:14, where Paul reminds the Galatians that when he visited them they welcomed him “as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus.” Ehrman takes this statement to mean that Jesus is an (or the) angel of God. However, it is far more likely that Paul’s language is progressive or ascending: the Galatians treated him as if he were an angel of God, and even as if he were Christ Jesus himself (for similar constructions in Greek, see Psalm 34:14 LXX; 84:14 LXX; Song of Sol. 1:5; Isa. 53:2; Ezek. 19:10). Earlier in the same passage, Galatians 4:4-6 shows that Paul thought of the Son and the Spirit as two divine persons sent by God the Father—one of numerous proto-Trinitarian passages in Paul.

Ehrman has done the church a service by reminding us that the issues of the resurrection of Christ and the deity of Christ are inextricably linked. He has also thrown down a challenge to Christian scholars to make the case for both of these truths in a fresh way that engages the evidence within a broader range of religious studies. His own theory, however, suffers from some various serious—one might say grave—flaws. I have offered a more detailed review of his book on the Parchment and Pen blog.
86 internautes sur 108 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Engaging, interesting, and captivating 25 mars 2014
Par Adam - Publié sur Amazon.com
Ehrman tells the very interesting story of what first led some early followers of Jesus to think Jesus is God. Many, including some evangelicals and conservative Christians, may be surprised that Ehrman concludes that many of Jesus’ earliest followers (including Paul and the author of the Gospel of Mark) did think Jesus was in some sense divine. However, Ehrman argues that what early Christians, including Paul, thought about Jesus’ divinity was very different than how Jesus’ divinity later came to be understood, for example, by Christians in the second, third, and fourth centuries and what is believed by many (but not all!) Christians today.

Ehrman approaches the question from a historical perspective, rather than a theological one. He is mainly interested in the historical process by which Jesus came to be understood as God. The picture Ehrman paints is one that is not unique to him but is also consistent with what is taught in many mainline seminaries, divinity schools, and university departments of religion. He devotes two chapters arguing that there is a relationship between the belief in Jesus’ resurrection from the dead and belief in Jesus’ divinity.

I found the book engaging, interesting, and captivating. I also enjoyed his personal anecdotes. Ehrman has developed the ability to communicate complex material in a clear and interesting way. Ehrman’s book is a great place to start or to approach the topic again from a fresh perspective. While the book is not written for a scholarly audience, but rather as a trade book for non-specialists, even those who are well read on the topic will appreciate Ehrman’s approach and presentation of the material.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous
Rechercher des commentaires

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique