undrgrnd Cliquez ici Baby KDP nav-sa-clothing-shoes nav-sa-clothing-shoes Cloud Drive Photos Beauty Cliquez ici Acheter Fire Acheter Kindle Paperwhite cliquez_ici Jeux Vidéo Gifts
Commencez à lire Infinitesimal sur votre Kindle dans moins d'une minute. Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici Ou commencez à lire dès maintenant avec l'une de nos applications de lecture Kindle gratuites.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil


Essai gratuit

Découvrez gratuitement un extrait de ce titre

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Désolé, cet article n'est pas disponible en
Image non disponible pour la
couleur :
Image non disponible

Infinitesimal: How a Dangerous Mathematical Theory Shaped the Modern World [Format Kindle]

Amir Alexander

Prix éditeur - format imprimé : EUR 14,82
Prix Kindle : EUR 11,80 TTC & envoi gratuit via réseau sans fil par Amazon Whispernet
Économisez : EUR 3,02 (20%)

App de lecture Kindle gratuite Tout le monde peut lire les livres Kindle, même sans un appareil Kindle, grâce à l'appli Kindle GRATUITE pour les smartphones, les tablettes et les ordinateurs.

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre adresse e-mail ou numéro de téléphone mobile.


Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 11,80  
Relié EUR 26,77  
Broché EUR 14,99  
MP3 CD --  

Idée cadeau Noël : Retrouvez toutes les idées cadeaux Livres dans notre Boutique Livres de Noël .

Les clients ayant acheté cet article ont également acheté

Cette fonction d'achat continuera à charger les articles. Pour naviguer hors de ce carrousel, veuillez utiliser votre touche de raccourci d'en-tête pour naviguer vers l'en-tête précédente ou suivante.

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

Fascinating.. Amir Alexander vividly recreates a wonderfully strange chapter of scientific history... You will never look at calculus the same way again.

(Jordan Ellenberg, Professor of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Clever and enthralling.'

(Simon Schaffer, Professor of the History of Science, University of Cambridge)

We thought we knew the whole story: Copernicus, Galileo, the sun in the centre, the Church rushing to condemn. Now this remarkable book puts the deeply subversive doctrine of atomism and its accompanying mathematics at the heart of modern science.

(Margaret C. Jacob, Distinguished Professor of History, University of California, Los Angeles)

A seamless synthesis of cultural history and storytelling... The history of mathematics has rarely been so readable.

(Michael Harris, Professor of Mathematics, Columbia University and Université Paris Diderot)

You may find it hard to believe that illustrious mathematicians, philosophers, and religious thinkers would engage in a bitter dispute over infinitely small quantities. Yet this is precisely what happened in the seventeenth century. In Infinitesimal, Amir Alexander puts this fascinating battle in historical and intellectual context.

(Mario Livio, Astrophysicist, Space Telescope Science Institute, and author of Brilliant Blunders: Fr)

Gripping... Amir Alexander writes with elegance and verve... A page-turner full of fascinating stories about the struggles of remarkable individuals and ideas, Infinitesimal will help you understand the world at a deeper level.

(Edward Frenkel, Professor, University of California at Berkeley, and author of Love and Math)

A real-world Da Vinci Code

(Publishers Weekly)

[Told with] high drama and thrilling tension.

(Kirkus Reviews (starred review))

A gripping tale of mathematical, philosophical, and theological controversies in the run-up to calculus.'

(Ian Stewart, author of Professor Stewart's Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities)

Bertrand Russell once wrote that mathematics had a beauty cold and austere ... Amir Alexander shows that mathematics can also become entangled in ugliness hot and messy... [a] fascinating narrative.

(New York Times)

A gripping and thorough history of the ultimate triumph of the mathematical tool... Infinitesimal will inspire you to dig deeper into the implications of the philosophy of mathematics and knowledge

(New Scientist)

A complex story told with skill and verve... Alexander does an excellent job of presenting both sides of the debate.

(THES Book of the Week)

Amir Alexander s enthralling book presents a controversial mathematical breakthrough, vividly describing the players and showing exactly what was at stake.

--(Tony Mann, Director of the Maths Centre, University of Greenwich)

Présentation de l'éditeur

Pulsing with drama and excitement, Infinitesimal celebrates the spirit of discovery,
innovation, and intellectual achievement-and it will forever change the way you look at a simple line.

On August 10, 1632, five men in flowing black robes convened in a somber Roman palazzo to pass judgment on a deceptively simple proposition: that a continuous line is composed of distinct and infinitely tiny parts. With the stroke of a pen the Jesuit fathers banned the doctrine of infinitesimals, announcing that it could never be taught or even mentioned. The concept was deemed dangerous and subversive, a threat to the belief that the world was an orderly place, governed by a strict and unchanging set of rules. If infinitesimals were ever accepted, the Jesuits feared, the entire world would be plunged into chaos.

In Infinitesimal, the award-winning historian Amir Alexander exposes the deep-seated reasons behind the rulings of the Jesuits and shows how the doctrine persisted, becoming the foundation of calculus and much of modern mathematics and technology. Indeed, not everyone agreed with the Jesuits. Philosophers, scientists, and mathematicians across Europe embraced infinitesimals as the key to scientific progress, freedom of thought, and a more tolerant society. As Alexander reveals, it wasn't long before the two camps set off on a war that pitted Europe's forces of hierarchy and order against those of pluralism and change.

The story takes us from the bloody battlefields of Europe's religious wars and the English Civil War and into the lives of the greatest mathematicians and philosophers of the day, including Galileo and Isaac Newton, Cardinal Bellarmine and Thomas Hobbes, and Christopher Clavius and John Wallis. In Italy, the defeat of the infinitely small signaled an end to that land's reign as the cultural heart of Europe, and in England, the triumph of infinitesimals helped launch the island nation on a course that would make it the world's first modern state.

From the imperial cities of Germany to the green hills of Surrey, from the papal palace in Rome to the halls of the Royal Society of London, Alexander demonstrates how a disagreement over a mathematical concept became a contest over the heavens and the earth. The legitimacy of popes and kings, as well as our beliefs in human liberty and progressive science, were at stake-the soul of the modern world hinged on the infinitesimal.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 4009 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 369 pages
  • Editeur : Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux; Édition : Reprint (8 avril 2014)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ASIN: B00FIL9B7E
  • Synthèse vocale : Activée
  • X-Ray :
  • Word Wise: Activé
  • Composition améliorée: Activé
  • Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon: n°262.110 dans la Boutique Kindle (Voir le Top 100 dans la Boutique Kindle)

En savoir plus sur les auteurs

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.1 étoiles sur 5  81 commentaires
49 internautes sur 53 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 Misleading... 4 juillet 2014
Par Timothy Haugh - Publié sur Amazon.com
As a math teacher, I’m often on the lookout for books that will help my students make connections between math and its importance, whether that be practical or historical. As I was teaching AP Calculus this year, Prof. Alexander’s book drew my attention. I was hoping for something that would really make a strong case for the importance of infinitesimal mathematics. Unfortunately, this book turned out to be something other than what I was looking for.

Essentially, there was considerably less discussion of math than I expected. Though there are some nice forays into some important basics, the touches on the foundational ideas here are quite brief. Primarily, this is a book of history. And yet, even the focus of the history is not mainly on mathematical ideas. This is a history of conflict where mathematics played a small part.

Infinitesimal is divided into two parts, each of which covers a major historical conflict. Part I deals with the Reformation and Counter-reformation. Our primary characters here are the Galileans and the Jesuits. In fact, there is a rather extensive history of the Jesuits and Prof. Alexander does a nice job of showing their developing educational philosophy. He describes how the Jesuits rejected the concept of the infinitesimal in favor of Euclidean geometry more for reasons of philosophy than general mathematics. In describing this conflict, however, Prof. Alexander deserves credit for being less hostile towards the Jesuits than one often finds in these descriptions, even if he overreaches a bit at the end, claiming that this rejection of the new math held back the development of math and science in Italy for centuries whereas the Protestant areas of Europe made the great leaps forward. This is not quite as true or as simple as Prof. Alexander tries to make it out to be.

Part II deals with the English Civil War. Here, the focus is almost entirely on Thomas Hobbes (for Euclidean geometry) and John Wallis (for infinitesimals). Once again, these men’s difference in mathematical technique was somewhat of a sideshow in their political differences—Hobbes and his Leviathan for a strong monarchy and Wallis a beneficiary of the Commonwealth. Somehow, both men managed to survive the chaos of their time with heads intact, though it could be argued that both men’s mathematical development suffered because of the need to achieve political ends. Still, Prof. Alexander seems to argue that it is the rise of Wallis and the slow decline of Hobbes that leads to Newton and the rise of England as the birthplace of much of the new physics which, once again, is not quite as true or simple as may be implied in this book.

In the end, I felt a bit misled. Though there is some very nice biography and history here, the math seems really to be secondary to the conflicts presented, however much Prof. Alexander wants to bring them to the fore. And his overall arguments about this mathematical theory shaping the modern world; well, this theory might have played a small role in this world of high intellectual ferment but, as much as I believe in the importance of math, there’s a lot more going on here than that. Prof. Alexander seems to know that, if his thesis doesn’t quite allow him to admit it.
46 internautes sur 52 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 A Brief History of the Jesuits and Infinitesimals That Needs Editing 7 mai 2014
Par Steven R. Staton - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle|Achat vérifié
This book is a quick read, and it seriously could be pared down with some editing. I found the repetition of the thesis to be tedious (e.g. the Jesuits suppressed the mathematics of the Infinitesimal because it clashed with their dogma) and really wish this book be edited to get to the point (pun intended) without having to circle around and repeat ideas that were introduced and examined with a fine tooth comb already. The details are fine, but the reiteration of the information was really off-putting.

I was also surprised that the story ends abruptly *before* Newton, when the mathematical world really took off thanks to the math of the infinite and continuous (i.e. the Calculus). There is a lot of mathematical history that would have added meat to this story starting in the late 1670's that simply isn't there (never mind the epic battle between Newton and Leibniz).

This story is richer than the book eludes to and I would strongly recommend that the author consider a second edition that had less repetition of plot and more history (especially post 1660) of this branch of mathematics. It's a shame that the e-book cannot include interactive diagrams of the key geometric proofs from Hobbes and the Italians, too.
71 internautes sur 89 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Not exactly war of all againts all, but still a very damaging fight 10 avril 2014
Par Mariano Apuya Jr - Publié sur Amazon.com
The opening chapters of "Infinitesimal" are about a board of Jesuits in the 17th century ruling on legitimacy of a mathematical topic. That which would be binding on every university of the Jesuit order-the most prestigious of the time. So I thought this was a book about intolerant and unscientific clergy oppressing reason or a hagiography for secularism. Expect none of that.
I have had come across this topic somewhere but I can't recall chapter in a book I don't remember. The point of that passage was the hostility of clergy to science
Roughly the present book is the history of mathematical thought of the infinitesimal. Halfway through I had the suspicion that it was the history of the limit concept, it is but partly so. This book is in fact a history book. There is substantial coverage of topics on social and historical subjects such as the reformation, the formation and fortunes of the Jesuits, even an entire chapter that is a précis of Thomas Hobbes' philosophy. And all of this is related to the subject of how the concept of infinitesimals took hold in what I think is an original analysis. Up until halfway, I was skeptical of the various arguments and even doubted its veracity-I was looking for holes in Mr. Alexander's account of the whole thing.

How it could be that geometrical thinking suppressed the infinitesimal concept from taking hold is fascinating (not solely geometry). It also had a lot to do with groupthink between several groups and some of these groups can be thought of as coteries. Geometric thinking introduced to humanity the concept of the Proof, should there be differences between Geometric proof and the kind students study in a `transition to abstract mathematics' course today? "Infinitesimal" maps the course it took.
There is a joke in mathematics publishing that for every equation in a book, half the readers go away. There really are not a lot of equations in this book, mostly it is geometric figures with the accompanying explanations-my rough count is ten. My reading of the book confirms my disability to follow geometric arguments but for the vast majority of readers this would be welcome as they are clearly written by Mr. Alexander. I'm hesitant to give this book the full five stars, clicked on five stars anyways because the reduction is infinitesimal. Has a place in my book collection.
10 internautes sur 11 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
2.0 étoiles sur 5 Same Mistake As Hobbes 23 septembre 2014
Par bonnie_blu - Publié sur Amazon.com
I was quite disappointed in this book for a number of reasons. First let me state that I am not a mathematician, although I have studied math through calculus. However, I am well versed in history.

1) The author makes the same mistake as Hobbes (and numerous others in the past and present) by attempting to make events fit his thesis. He states that the battle over infinitesimals was a key player in the massive social changes that took place in the 16th and 17th centuries in Europe and England. Anyone familiar with this period in history can argue that the mathematical battles were but one symptom of the very complex social stressors that swept Europe and England during that time. However, the author cherry picks events to support his thesis while almost ignoring the numerous other forces, characters, etc. that were in play.
2) He credits the success of Wallis's approach over Hobbes with all successive mathematical and technological advances into modernity. As history has shown over and over again, it is never this simple when determining the causes and courses of human history.
3) The book is in serious need of editing. It is mind-numbingly redundant and often wanders off into tangents that add little to nothing to the information.

What should have been an interesting book on this period in the history of mathematics is seriously flawed (in my opinion) by the author's attempt to shoehorn events and people to fit his thesis, and his attempt to make the outcome of the mathematical conflict responsible for our modern world.
110 internautes sur 148 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
2.0 étoiles sur 5 Fundamentally confused 14 avril 2014
Par Polymath - Publié sur Amazon.com
There are two different debates in the foundations of mathematics that are confused here.

The first debate is whether the continuous line is made up of infinitely small points. This was settled by the development of the real number system which allowed each point on the line to be expressed algebraically by a decimal expansion.

The second question is whether the real numbers were enough or whether the line had additional points on it so that the corresponding number system failed to satisfy the Archimedan axiom (in other words, points greater than 0 but less than ALL the numbers 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4 , 1/5, ... ).

The second view was used by many mathematicians in the 17th through 19th centuries to develop calculus in a way that was NOT logically rigorous, and which was CORRECTLY criticized as incoherent by Bishop Berkeley and others, culminating in the logically rigorous and irreproachable treatment of Cauchy in the 1830's, further developed and modernized by Weierstrass and Dedekind a generation later, which used limits to avoid infinitesimals and allowed completely convincing proofs to be given.

It was not until Abraham Robinson in the 1950's demonstrated that infinitesimals could be consistent if one was much more careful than the 17th-19th century mathematicians had been, that alternatives to the standard real number system were taken seriously again.

Points infinitely small? Always ok. Numbers as intervals between points infinitely small? Properly rejected as non-rigorous and unnecessary prior to 1960; now accepted as capable of being made rigorous but still not necessary.

Modern physics casts doubt on the scientific necessity of the earlier view of infinitely small points on the line represented by the standard real numbers, because of the existence of a tiny fundamental length scale, so the argument is not settled by an appeal to physical reality.

The version of the real numbers we use, given by decimal expansions or rational approximations with no infinitesimals, really is logically better, as was first recognized by Archimedes two millennia before Calculus (which he invented) was rediscovered by Newton and Leibniz. Archimedes used infinitesimals as a mental shortcut to find results that he later made rigorous by using perfectly valid limit arguments of the kind Cauchy later generalized.

Confusing these two issues in order to contrast modern irreligious freethinkers with dogmatic old Christian fuddy-duddies and bask in political self-satisfaction is tendentious and fundamentally wrong.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique