undrgrnd Cliquez ici Baby KDP nav-sa-clothing-shoes nav-sa-clothing-shoes Cloud Drive Photos cliquez_ici Cliquez ici Acheter Fire Acheter Kindle Paperwhite cliquez_ici Jeux Vidéo Gifts
Acheter d'occasion
EUR 27,96
+ EUR 2,99 (livraison)
D'occasion: Très bon | Détails
Vendu par Nearfine
État: D'occasion: Très bon
Commentaire: Petites traces d'usage. Livraison prévue sous 20 jours.
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir cette image

Interpreting Bach's Well-Tempered Clavier: Performer's Discourse of Method (Anglais) Relié – 1 juillet 1985

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 270,36 EUR 27,96
"Veuillez réessayer"

Idées cadeaux Livres Idées cadeaux Livres

Idées cadeaux Livres
Retrouvez toutes nos idées cadeaux dans notre Boutique Livres de Noël.

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre adresse e-mail ou numéro de téléphone mobile.

Détails sur le produit

En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 5 commentaires
11 internautes sur 12 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Kirkpatrick's WTC is Excellent 11 mars 2008
Par Dhamaryder - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
After reading the review below i wondered if maybe this book IS what I was looking for. So I found it and took it out of the library. I couldn't put it down. I devowered the first 40 pages very quickly(and I'm a slow reader) and realized I had to own this book. It's extremely insightful. It's true, it's not one of those goes through documenting every entrance of the subject, countersubject, and episodes. i mean really, who needs that? Most of that jumps right out from the music anyway. And he does talk about the difference between analyses that close your ears to the music and analyses that open your ears. this is definitely in the latter category. Although I have to say, you'd never guess that by looking at the cover.
8 internautes sur 8 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Superb 23 mars 2010
Par John Hartford - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché
I had to write to counter the poor review below. This is Kirkpatrick at his best. You can find plenty of books that will explain the mechanics of fugue writing. Here is "A Performer's Discourse on Method." Kirkpatrick knows what he's talking about. Highly recommended.
6 internautes sur 6 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Exceptional artist, exceptional book 3 juin 2013
Par A. F. K. Monkman - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché
Yes, I also wanted to bump the rating (a full five being insufficient for this modest tome). As an example, one of my favorite passages:
"Too often historical authenticity can be used as a means of escape from any potentially disquieting observance of esthetic values, and from the assumption of any genuine artistic responsibility. The abdication of esthetic values and artistic responsibilities can confer a certain illusion of simplicity on what the passage of history has presented to us, bleached as white as bones on the sands of time. We are all familiar with those simplistic notions with which it has become customary to regard the ancient Greeks. Some of us are capable of imagining a welcome objectivity in sixteenth-century music sung without any expression or any artistry whatsoever. A certain attractiveness is to be found in the notion that it has been rendered unproblematical. Whether or not Bach is a composer to render unproblematical is anyone's privilege to decide."
Quite probably though (going on performances I've heard) there are those even today who might well take exception to the above.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
This is a wonderful insight into Kirkpatrick's approach to performance. Idiosyncratic, but insightful and helpful. 21 août 2015
Par Craig Matteson - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
I have recently been looking at “The Well-Tempered Clavier” again and was hoping someone had written a theoretical analysis of the fugues. That is, I wanted a shortcut to the subjects, answers, countersubjects, episodes, and so forth. If they offered a voice-leading analysis, all the better. I have not found that yet. Maybe because the market for that kind of technical material is just too small and those of us who are interested in it can do the analysis ourselves, but we just want to save time. Plus, the college kids who have to do that kind of analysis for class would use it to cheat. I don’t know why it isn’t available, it just isn’t. I saw one website that color codes the subjects and countersubjects but the score is small and running by as the piece is played so it is of much practical use.

I bought this book because I have a high regard for Ralph Kirkpatrick, as we all should, and figured anything he had to say on the WTC would be helpful. As I started reading the book I realized it was strangely familiar. Then it hit me. I had read this book when it was new and I was in music school decades back. I am sure that my reactions to it now are a bit different now than they were back then, but I remember reading the passages. And I believe I saw much the same overall strengths and weaknesses of the book then as I do now.

I studied music for a year a Michigan State University in 1972-1973 and then at the University of Michigan School of Music from 1978-1983. I graduated with a Bachelor of Music in music theory in 1981 and then did 57 graduate hours before I left music and switched to a career in computer networks. But I still keep up with music and enjoy playing my piano and studying music. These years were a hot time for the study of Early Music and its performance practices. I was fortunate to be able to participate in a ground breaking performance of Handel’s “Messiah” as part of a world-wide Handel conference here in Ann Arbor. Ars Musica was the orchestra. We had a choir of about 24 (six on a part, more or less – maybe a few more) and the soloists were Emma Kirkby, Renee Jacobs, Marius van Altena, and Max van Egmond. We were led my Edward Parmentier and he and Penelope Crawford provided the harpsichord continuo. Altogether, we did a complete performance with fewer than 50 performers. It was fun and both delighted and angered people.

I bring this up because this is exactly what Kirkpatrick was experiencing as he was, beginning decades earlier, trying to think about and teach an approach to early music that broke severely with 19th Century traditional musical practice and tried to recreate an approach that seemed to him (and other “original performance practice” revolutionaries) as more connected to the instrumentation and the musical language itself. And it was based, so far as is possible, upon the writings of musicians and composers of those times. And that is what Kirkpatrick is trying to provide in this book. The book is much more about performance and its practice than about theoretical ideas or analysis. Over and over and over again, Kirkpatrick focuses us on what we hear when we actually play the music. We are counselled to listen, to feel and to experiment and never to merely receive opinions from a teacher or critic or to play by rote.

The book consists of six chapters each consisting of an approach to music, with the WTC providing the basis of the musical examples for the book. However, these lessons can apply to all music of any period, even if they are meant to be especially apt for the music of Bach and his fellows from the Baroque and just after.

The first chapter elucidates what the author calls the “Historical Approach”. He wants us to seek after the reason for which the music was created, the meaning of the language of the pieces, such as the title “Well-Tempered Clavier”. He also wants to us become sophisticated about the scores of the music we play and to see past the encrustations added by editors to the actual work of the composer. We also have to be aware of musical fashions and fads. Finally, don’t be afraid to read the best scholarship about the music you want to learn and master.

The second chapter examines things like the works in the WTC, thinking about the implications of organization for performance (if any), the kind of instrument to be used and the sound of those instruments, and the opinions of a range of performers. Kirkpatrick calls this the aesthetic approach (he spells it esthetic).

The third chapter is on “The Melodic Approach”, which is not so much about counterpoint or the horizontal voice leading of Bach’s music, but of the importance of our singing with our own voices the music we are going to play. Kirkpatrick is correct when he says that passages we do not know well enough to sing clearly and accurately are going to betray us under the pressure of performance. That the exercise of actually singing the music, each line, each voice, will make the music clear in our minds and help us understand and retain the music. This includes not just the notes and rhythm, but the articulations and phrasing. Singing a multi-voice fugue with friends will help everyone learn the piece better. I also really like his encouragement to step or dance the melodies by stepping the interval sizes. That is, decide what the seconds, thirds, fourths, fifths, sixths, sevenths, octaves would be and then step them off as you sing the melody. This really puts the sense of the music in your very body.

The next chapter is on the rhythmic approach to understanding the music. Kirkpatrick steps back from the definition of meter and rhythm in his Scarlatti book and then despairs of providing one. I think this is silly. Meter is simply the underlying pulse or heartbeat of a work and the nature of how those beats are subdivided (in twos or threes – simple or compound meter). Tempo is the rate of those beats (a fast or slow heart beat). Rhythm is the interplay of the music (the “motives”, the melody, the harmonic changes, the way the lines or “voices” of the music play against each other) against that pulse or heartbeat of the meter. The meter is regular and if and when it changes within a work it is a big thing in the work. Rhythm may or may not change against that pulse.

Rhythm is very important because it helps us connect to and remember a work. I could play “Yankee Doodle” with every note wrong, but if I play the rhythm of the work correctly, you will likely recognize it as “Yankee Doodle”. However, if I play the melodic notes correctly and get the rhythm off by enough, you won’t be able to tell what it is.

His chapter on “The Harmonic Approach” remains, for me, the least convincing. I think what he is railing against is the old school harmonic analysis that puts Roman numeral figures under every vertical structure because of what it looks like without regard to its musical function in a work. And that is a very good, if old fashioned, point. Just because notes are sounding simultaneously doesn’t make them a “chord”. Nor do all chords have equal structural, musical, or rhetorical importance. But to say that Bach is all about harmony and not very much about counterpoint is, to me, just silly. Of course Bach is a contrapuntalist of the first order. But, no, not in the simple way counterpoint used to be taught in music courses. I was fortunate to be taught about voice leading and the way music unfolds harmonies over time and happens at various levels and points of remove. Kirkpatrick is right that we must focus on what we hear and not on what we see on the page. But his, for example, “harmonic reduction” on page 97 (example 5.5) of the E flat minor prelude of book I seems pretty useless to me. I don’t understand its point at all. I must have missed something.

The final chapter provides the author’s approach to bringing all the preparatory work together into a compelling and personal “interpretation” of the work you are performing. He justly rails against mere typing the notes on the keyboard as if the instrument were going to turn the notes into music. He also rejects anyone unthinkingly copying another’s performance as if that would also be music. While he encourages us to bring ourselves to the music, he also does not want us to become indulgent or mistaking musical fashion for personal interpretation. We always, in the end, are reduced to that ineffable idea of what good taste is in performing, but we each think we know it when we hear it.

I gained from reading this book decades back and re-reading it last week. It wasn’t what I was seeking when I purchased it, but I gained from it after all; even without agreeing with some of what the author says. If an author can inspire a reader to become more clear in his thinking about his own views, even contrary views, I think the reader has gained a lot.

Reviewed by Craig Matteson, Saline, MI
5 internautes sur 31 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
disappointing 25 janvier 2007
Par Goggle-Eyed Slewfoot - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
If you are looking for an analysis of the expositions and episodes of the fugues in the Well-Tempered Clavier, this book is not for you.

If you are looking for an analysis of the harmonic progression in the preludes, this book is not for you.

If you are looking for debate on which tempi to choose, this book is not for you.

In fact, it is hard to say who this book IS for!

The book consists mostly of philosophical discourse on melody, rhythm, and harmony. The author uses only a few examples from the WTC. I would summarize that philosophical discourse for you, but it was lost on me.

Ralph Kirkpatrick was a well-known harpsichordist, and was especially renowned for his catalogue of the works of Domenico Scarlatti. This book was published at the end of his life. He had apparently lost most of his mental faculties by that time, and the book was probably accepted for publication only because of his name. It is unfortunate that Kirkpatrick did not write such a book in his younger years.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?