undrgrnd Cliquez ici RLit nav-sa-clothing-shoes Cloud Drive Photos FIFA16 cliquez_ici Rentrée scolaire Shop Fire HD 6 Shop Kindle cliquez_ici Jeux Vidéo Bijoux Montres Montres
Commencez à lire A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the struggle that... sur votre Kindle dans moins d'une minute. Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici Ou commencez à lire dès maintenant avec l'une de nos applications de lecture Kindle gratuites.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

 
 
 

Essai gratuit

Découvrez gratuitement un extrait de ce titre

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Désolé, cet article n'est pas disponible en
Image non disponible pour la
couleur :
Image non disponible
 

A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the struggle that shaped the Middle East (English Edition) [Format Kindle]

James Barr
4.7 étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (3 commentaires client)

Prix éditeur - format imprimé : EUR 13,03
Prix Kindle : EUR 7,44 TTC & envoi gratuit via réseau sans fil par Amazon Whispernet
Économisez : EUR 5,59 (43%)

App de lecture Kindle gratuite Tout le monde peut lire les livres Kindle, même sans un appareil Kindle, grâce à l'appli Kindle GRATUITE pour les smartphones, les tablettes et les ordinateurs.

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre adresse e-mail ou numéro de téléphone mobile.

Formats

Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 7,44  
Relié EUR 36,29  
Broché EUR 7,83  




Les clients ayant acheté cet article ont également acheté

Cette fonction d'achat continuera à charger les articles. Pour naviguer hors de ce carrousel, veuillez utiliser votre touche de raccourci d'en-tête pour naviguer vers l'en-tête précédente ou suivante.

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

'With superb research and telling quotations, Barr has skewered the whole shabby story...The convulsion of that fateful line in the sand are still being felt today - not only in the Middle East, but throughout the world' --Michael Binyon, The Times
'Racy... [Barr] is right to assert that few British readers grasp the ferocity of Anglo-French antagonism in the Levant' --Max Hastings, Sunday Times

Présentation de l'éditeur

In 1916, in the middle of the First World War, two men secretly agreed to divide the Middle East between them. Sir Mark Sykes was a visionary politician; François Georges-Picot a diplomat with a grudge. The deal they struck, which was designed to relieve tensions that threatened to engulf the Entente Cordiale, drew a line in the sand from the Mediterranean to the Persian frontier. Territory north of that stark line would go to France; land south of it, to Britain. The creation of Britain's 'mandates' of Palestine, Transjordan and Iraq, and France's in Lebanon and Syria, made the two powers uneasy neighbours for the following thirty years.
Through a stellar cast of politicians, diplomats, spies and soldiers, including T. E. Lawrence, Winston Churchill and Charles de Gaulle, A Line in the Sand vividly tells the story of the short but crucial era when Britain and France ruled the Middle East. It explains exactly how the old antagonism between these two powers inflamed the more familiar modern rivalry between the Arabs and the Jews, and ultimately led to war between the British and French in 1941 and between the Arabs and Jews in 1948.
In 1946, after many years of intrigue and espionage, Britain succeeded in ousting France from Lebanon and Syria, and hoped that, having done so, it would be able to cling on to Palestine. Using newly declassified papers from the British and French archives, James Barr brings this clandestine struggle back to life, and reveals, for the first time, the stunning way in which the French finally got their revenge.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 1943 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 464 pages
  • Editeur : Simon & Schuster UK (27 octobre 2011)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ASIN: B007CXK15W
  • Synthèse vocale : Non activée
  • X-Ray :
  • Word Wise: Activé
  • Composition améliorée: Non activé
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : 4.7 étoiles sur 5  Voir tous les commentaires (3 commentaires client)
  • Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon: n°63.327 dans la Boutique Kindle (Voir le Top 100 dans la Boutique Kindle)
  •  Souhaitez-vous faire modifier les images ?


En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Quels sont les autres articles que les clients achètent après avoir regardé cet article?


Commentaires en ligne

3 étoiles
0
2 étoiles
0
1 étoiles
0
4.7 étoiles sur 5
4.7 étoiles sur 5
Commentaires client les plus utiles
3 internautes sur 3 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Une lecture enrichissante et captivante 26 octobre 2012
Format:Broché|Achat vérifié
Ouvrage bien structuré et documenté, permettant au lecteur averti mais non spécialiste une meilleure compréhension de la genèse des conflits qui agitent le Proche Orient. Qui a prétendu que l'histoire ne repassait pas les plats ?
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ?
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Un moyen-Orient à la sauce anglaise 12 avril 2015
Format:Format Kindle|Achat vérifié
ouvrage remarquablement documenté... malheureusement un peu trop "one-sided " pour ma sensibilité de frenchman. Indispensable pour qui veut tenter de comprendre le Moyen-Orient mais aussi et peut-être davantage encore la longue histoire des relations franco-britanniques...
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ?
5.0 étoiles sur 5 unavoidable 4 mai 2015
Format:Format Kindle
the best book I've read about Middle-East issues and their history. It explains the catch22 drama of today ! a must read
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ?
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.2 étoiles sur 5  13 commentaires
3 internautes sur 3 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 thoroughly entertaining review of one of the most tempestuous periods in modern history 27 avril 2014
Par Adam Royale - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle|Achat vérifié
James Barr's enthralling tale is well told and even better researched as it takes us through the tortuous roads of colonial intrigue that finally releases the forces and tensions of the modern Middle East. The book depicts both Britain and France as the midwives of the state of Israel whose rivalries also gives birth to the grotesque and grissly monsters that has become today's Syria, Iraq and of course Palestine. Highly recommended to anyone who would like to understand the political and social dilemmas facing middle eastern politicians and populace would try to work for a lasting peace in the Region. If ever there is an expose of the thoroughly discredited policies of colonial conquest and rule, this book demonstrates it in an understated and thoroughly human way. Highly recommended
2 internautes sur 2 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
2.0 étoiles sur 5 This well-written and researched book has been spoiled by a ... 20 février 2015
Par Richard Lightbown - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché
This well-written and researched book has been spoiled by a plethora of petty errors and omissions. This limits its use as an academic source. I did not record all the inaccuracies that I noticed, but the following come to mind:
1) Britain did no ‘seize’ Cyprus in 1878 (p9): it was leased to the British Empire following the Congress of Berlin.
2) Neither did Britain ‘seize’ the Suez Canal (p9): it took out a loan from Rothschild to buy the Egyptian Government’s stock.
3) In his account of the Fashoda Incident of 1898 Barr omits any reference to the Anglo-Egyptian victory under Kitchener at Omdurman earlier in that year when nearly 10,000 Sudanese were killed for the loss of 28 British and 20 Egyptians. It was hardly surprising therefore that the French force of 12 French officers and 150 Senegalese soldiers was ordered to withdraw after Kitchener arrived at Fashoda with 2,500 Sudanese soldiers and five gunboats with Maxim guns and field-guns.
4) The suggestion that Ronald Storrs was responsible for instigating the Hussein-McMahon correspondence (p23) is implausible, although the egotistical Storrs may have claimed this to have been so. Hussein’s son Abdullah had contacted Kitchener in February 1914 when the latter was British Agent and Consul-General in Egypt. Although Kitchener was non-committal, contacts had been maintained. Storrs, who was not fully fluent in Arabic, was more likely to have been responsible for the gaffs in the correspondence, such as the suggestion that Lebanese Christians were not Arabs.
5) Herbert Samuel is similarly credited for the work of others on p32. Samuel was certainly an ardent Zionist, but the real hard graft and intrigue to secure the Balfour Declaration was led by Chaim Weizmann, backed by Walter Rothschild.
6) Barr mentions on p51 that Allenby’s predecessor had twice failed to capture Gaza. In fact the town had been captured during the first Battle of Gaza but Dobell had feared a counter attack and had ordered a withdrawal. The exhausted troops were unable to recapture the town the following day. Barr does not mention that gas and tanks were used during the Second Battle although both were rendered ineffective by the heat and, in the case of the tanks, the sandy conditions. The town was razed by shelling from Australian artillery and the French Navy during the third battle.
7) The account of the riot at Haifa oil refinery is misleading. The Irgun had thrown grenades into a crowd of Arab workers killing six and wounding forty-two. This provoked the attack on Jewish workers in the refinery, for which Ilan Pappé gives different casualty figures (39 killed and 49 wounded). The Jewish Agency publically condemned the Irgun atrocity but secretly authorised the Hagannah to carry out retaliation. This took the form of raids on the villages of Balad al-Shaykh and Hawsha where houses were blown and set on fire and according to Zachary Lockman some 60 were killed, included women and children.
8) The death toll at Deir Yassin (p365) is generally reckoned to be much less than 250, even by scholars critical of the Zionist actions. Barr ought to have mentioned that the village had an agreement with the Hagannah that it would not allow Arab fighters to stay there and in return the Zionists had promised not to attack it. In consequence Haganah forces had not intended to take part in the attack. However Stern Gang and Irgun members had been unable to overcome resistance in the headman’s house (they were more familiar with caching bombs and ambushing soldiers and unarmed civilians) so a nearby Palmach unit was briefly called in to suppress the resistance.
9) The victims of the reprisal massacre on Mt Scopus in Jerusalem (p366) were not all non-combatants (Barr describes them as ‘doctors, nurses and students’). The dead included two members of the Irgun injured at Deir Yassin, and members of the armed escort from the Hagannah.
10) The Altalena which Barr describes on p364 as a 'landing craft' was actually a landing ship, tank (LST) of 4,800 tons.

The problem of this sloppy writing is that when Barr gets into original material from his own researches one is unable to to accept it at face value but is also unable to verify it from other sources. This considerably detracts from the value of the work as a source of reference.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Great Book to Know the Present 26 mai 2015
Par Ihab - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché
I am half way through the book. I am telling this book clear any ambiguity about what was happening in the middle east after the collapse of the Ottoman empire. And also it allowed me to rethink of what is going on currently in the middle east. One important chapter, if you will, summarize the whole conflict "The Pipelines"
3 internautes sur 4 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Colonial Rivalry 22 septembre 2012
Par kadiya - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle|Achat vérifié
Barr reveals just how caustic the jealousies of the colonial rivals, France and Britain, were in the first part of the 20th century. It is fascinating to observe how the petty conceits of a national leader can affect the history of nations. I was surprised at how far the British went to appease de Gaulle, while they were actually supposed to be allies. The book was entertaining in the way it recorded surreptious methods in which the actual characters on the ground in Syria and Palestine circumvented the constraints of Whitehall to do what was best in Britain's interest. Intriguing!
4.0 étoiles sur 5 The Bad and the Ugly without much Good. 29 janvier 2015
Par ahertzba - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle|Achat vérifié
A look at the an unfortunate period in the history of the Middle East with all the warts of self-interest and short sightedness -- the destructiveness of looking in the mirror and not out the window. There are few heroes, though I'm sure that each of the adversaries have a different and self-justifying story to tell. Alas, the spinning does nothing to alleviate the results attained. Despite the "where you sit determines where you stand" truism, bad policies come home to roost, as in "what comes around goes around." This book is an excellent integration of complex, multi-faceted events and a sad read.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous
Rechercher des commentaires
Rechercher uniquement parmi les commentaires portant sur ce produit

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Thème:
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier
 

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon
   


Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique