Neil Armstrong: A Life of Flight et plus d'un million d'autres livres sont disponibles pour le Kindle d'Amazon. En savoir plus
EUR 23,67
  • Tous les prix incluent la TVA.
Il ne reste plus que 7 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon.
Emballage cadeau disponible.
Quantité :1
Neil Armstrong: A Life of... a été ajouté à votre Panier
Amazon rachète votre
article EUR 6,75 en chèque-cadeau.
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir les 2 images

Neil Armstrong: A Life of Flight (Anglais) Relié – 31 juillet 2014

Voir les 6 formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 23,67
EUR 13,78 EUR 22,38
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 15,34

A court d'idées pour Noël ?

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Les clients ayant acheté cet article ont également acheté

Vendez cet article - Prix de rachat jusqu'à EUR 6,75
Vendez Neil Armstrong: A Life of Flight contre un chèque-cadeau d'une valeur pouvant aller jusqu'à EUR 6,75, que vous pourrez ensuite utiliser sur tout le site Les valeurs de rachat peuvent varier (voir les critères d'éligibilité des produits). En savoir plus sur notre programme de reprise Amazon Rachète.

Détails sur le produit

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) 93 commentaires
14 internautes sur 14 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Strange 28 août 2014
Par Sussex - Publié sur
Format: Relié
This is an odd book. It's not really a biography since it only starts in detail when Armstrong bales out in Korea and the author employs some of the devices of the novelist as well as the historian. Secondly, it is more of a re-telling of the early US manned space program than just a book about Armstrong. According to the author this is an insider's view and "the primary engine driving this book is accuracy". The author makes two other assertions that I will hold him to. "Neil's words in this book are direct quotes by me and others I know to be trustworthy", and "At times I will put myself in Neil's shoes to re-create his thoughts . . .". Well, I have only Barbree's word for the "insider" aspect and will return to it later.

So far as accuracy is concerned, the primary engine doesn't seem to be quite firing on all cylinders. At times the author appears to be very careful with his phraseology, giving a misleading impression whilst avoiding being pinned down. I will give one trifling example from his account of Apollo 8 on page 172: "signals between Apollo 8 and Mission Control would be blocked for more than twenty minutes". Since it was actually 35 minutes the statement is not untrue but is misleading. More seriously, on page 194 discussing Tom Stafford we have: "secretly has test-flown two versions of Russia's MiGs". Well not by Apollo 10 he hadn't, Stafford flew the MiGs years later after he'd left the astronaut office so clearly misleading. Or how about page 149 discussing training in the LLTV prior to Apollo 7: "likely moon-landing commanders Neil Armstrong, Pete Conrad, Jim Lovell, Alan Shepard, David Scott, John Young and Gene Cernan busied themselves trying to master flying the Bedstead". Well, that simply isn't true of most of them at that time, and other guys who were not in the frame for lunar command did make flights. There is a huge amount of this sort of thing throughout. Individually they may be considered minor points, but together form a kind of squidgy barrier between the reader and the actual facts.

Then there are the straight forward inaccuracies. From Apollo 11 on page 214: "He [Armstrong] was the only member of the crew with a window until they ejected the escape tower", no he wasn't, Aldrin in the centre couch had a clear hatch window. Or how about this fantasy from Apollo 11 on page 258: "Four lights gleamed brightly - four marvellous lights welcoming them to another world . . . Four round landing pads at the end of Eagle's legs rested . . .". Well there were a lot more than four lights on in Eagle's cabin but I assume that Barbree is attempting to refer to the single blue Lunar Contact light illuminated by the first of three probes to hit the surface (the front landing pad had no probe). And there's plenty more where they came from. The space pen story rears it's head again, but we know Aldrin actually used a Duro marker pen.

But my favourite inaccuracies appear in numerous photograph captions. A handful of examples begins with page 59 showing the X-15A-2 carrying a dummy SCRAMJET years after Armstrong left the program rather than "Neil's X-15 moves into black sky". Page 96 shows Armstrong during an ejection seat weight and balance check rather than "Neil tries on his Gemini 8 commander's spacesuit". I don't know where the picture on page 109 came from but it wasn't Gemini 8. Page 199 shows Stafford and Cernan on Earth in a simulator not "8.4 miles above the moon". Page 203 shows Endeavour in lunar orbit during Apollo 15 not Charlie Brown during Apollo 10. The caption on page 204 is just so wrong I don't know where to begin. Page 246 is an unacknowledged composite picture giving a completely misleading perspective. Getting bored of this nonsense? I am.

Then we have the semi-fictitious stuff set in Russia. Very dramatic but not strictly fully supportable by the record. Other events, such as Young's light hearted banter with Mission Control during Apollo 10 are twisted by Barbree. As they say, never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

Now for "direct quotes". Well Barbree can't even get the inscription on Eagle's plaque correct, only wrong by one letter, but giving a rather different impression. Nit picky? Yes, but it's not difficult and remember what the "primary engine" was? Or on page 253 during Eagle's powered descent: "Give us a reading on the 1202 Program alarm, Houston, right now". Armstrong never said the last three words, so "direct quote"? More like a change of emphasis by the author. Again, readers will find more of this if they care to look.

As for putting himself in Neil's shoes some of it, like describing looking at Mount Fuji seems pretty harmless. Elsewhere, such as some of the "thoughts" about his daughter it seems to be presumptuous. But for me the oddest parts are towards the end. Chapter 24 ends with the line "His [Armstrong's] thoughts are next". After a quick description of the Big Bang at the start of Chapter 25 (one assumes by Armstrong and it's certainly written in his style), we get on page 337: "Neil Armstrong, as did most questioned . . .", implying a change in viewpoint but also calling into question exactly who the previous speaker was meant to be, and this confounding of Armstrong's supposed thoughts with Barbree's own viewpoint occurs to a greater or lesser extent throughout the book. I'm sure that journalist Barbree feels justified in this kind of thing because he believes he was a close friend and fellow aviator with some kind of "inside scoop" on Armstrong's head. I find that rather hard to buy.

There are some interesting hints and points here, but the author's wishy washy style and carelessness with facts leaves one cautious as to their veracity. Overall I found this book sentimental, inaccurate, misleading and rather lazy. If you want the facts about Armstrong's life read Hansen. Sure there was more but that was private and we'll never really know, which is what Armstrong wanted.

Armstrong deserves much better.
12 internautes sur 12 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Anticipated but huge disappointment 4 septembre 2014
Par Murdue - Publié sur
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
First Man was much better, more detailed, more scientific, more meaty. This book is fluff and narrative, especially the contrived conversations and discussions are just too much. I am sure Neil was quiet and dignified, but the man was an engineer and scientist and loved his subject matter. Having attended UC Engineering while he was Dean (not mentioned in the book) and also a resident of his small community, I know the man by reputation pretty well. I just don't think this fluff piece captured the real Neil Armstrong very well.
16 internautes sur 18 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
A poor tribute to Armstrong 10 août 2014
Par Delta Sigma - Publié sur
Format: Relié
Another loser book from Mr. Barbree. For somebody who spent his professional life reporting on the space program, this book has way too many historical and technical errors (I noted over 50 of them). And since I was an engineer on Gemini and Apollo at Kennedy, I think I have a pretty good perspective. The most preposterous error is the photo caption on page 280 where he states that it shows Columbia in lunar orbit while the LM is still on the surface. So who took the photo, lunar aliens?

I'm sure Mr. Armstrong would be very upset with this book; he deserves much better.
7 internautes sur 7 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Lots and lots of problems 24 octobre 2014
Par Graham Dixon - Publié sur
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
There are other, and much better, Armstrong biographies out there. This one reads and feels as though it was rushed to press immediately after the astronaut's death, and is absolutely full of inaccuracies. Other reviewers have noted some of these, but I was stunned to see Nikolai Kamanin, a senior figure in the Soviet space program, referred to as 'Lev Kamanin' both in the text and the index. It's a sloppy piece of work, in need of serious editing; there are dozens of problems with commas, leaving the text difficult to read, almost as though, in places, it was dictated into Dragon. Pass on this and read 'First Man' instead.
21 internautes sur 28 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
Fawning, Underwhelming Book About A Great Man 22 juillet 2014
Par Aeropix - Publié sur
Format: Relié
This sad attempt to exploit a friendship is long on poorly written space history and short on insight. Neil Armstrong deserves better. This is hack writing, repetitive in places and boring in others. How Barbree could claim close access to Armstrong, and yet write so insipidly, proves baffling. And did anybody at St. Martin's Press proofread the galleys? Here's one of many examples, from page 90: "Neil knew the Russians [sic] clear warning to their cosmonauts that they were headed for the moon was well noted by his agency." Bad writing + bad grammar + bad punctuation + the passive voice = a horrible disservice to the last American hero. Armstrong was a gifted writer, and would be appalled to have his name on this book. There are better accounts elsewhere of the Apollo program; unfortunately, we'll have to wait for somebody else to write the definitive biography of Armstrong.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?