| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Produits fréquemment achetés ensemble
Descriptions du produit
Description
“[OLYMPOS] manages to mix great literary pastiche with some highly original storytelling...thoughtful, inventive, clever and action-packed.” (Sunday Denver Post )
“Ambitious, witty, moving: Simmons at his best.” (Kirkus Reviews )
“Insanely ambitious . . . Ilium and OLYMPOS together solidify [Simmons’s] reputation as one of science fiction’s genuine modern masters.” (San Francisco Chronicle )
“A thoughtful but fast-paced tale that will leave heads spinning and hearts racing.” (Newark Star Ledger )
“Philosophy, physics and literature 101, wrapped up in the trappings of Buck Rogers-style space opera: great fun.” (St. Louis Post-Dispatch )
“Fans of epic, action-driven science fiction will talk about this inventive and highly-addictive thriller for years.” (School Library Journal )
Présentation de l'éditeur
Beneath the gaze of the gods, the mighty armies of Greece and Troy met in fierce and glorious combat, scrupulously following the text set forth in Homer's timeless narrative. But that was before twenty-first-century scholar Thomas Hockenberry stirred the bloody brew, causing an enraged Achilles to join forces with his archenemy Hector and turn his murderous wrath on Zeus and the entire pantheon of divine manipulators; before the swift and terrible mechanical creatures that catered for centuries to the pitiful idle remnants of Earth's human race began massing in the millions, to exterminate rather than serve.
And now all bets are off.
Détails sur le produit
Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?
|
En savoir plus sur l'auteur
› Consultez la page Dan Simmons d'Amazon
Parcourir et rechercher une autre édition de ce livre.
Helen of Troy awakes just before dawn to the sound of air raid sirens. Lire la première page
Concordance
Couverture | Copyright | Extrait | Quatrième de couverture
Mots-clés inspirés de produits similaires(De quoi s'agit-il ?)Soyez le premier à ajouter un mot-clé pertinent (fortement associé à ce produit)
|
Quels sont les autres articles que les clients achètent après avoir regardé cet article?
Commentaires en ligne
Certainly these two novels constitute an ambitious effort by Simmons. I was attracted to "Ilium" because I teach Classical Greek and Roman Mythology, look for any opportunity to teach Homer's "Iliad," and am even working on my own retelling of the Trojan War on the off chance that I can actually write something besides instructor's notes and reviews. So I found the idea of posthumans masquerading as the Greek gods, living on Mars, and playing games with the real Trojan War, rather compelling because Simmons was using hard (and futuristic) science to duplicate the powers of the gods. Besides, obviously I was going to identify with Thomas Hockenberry, the classics professor who had been resurrected as a scholic and not because he ends up in the bed of Helen of Troy (I find Andromache to be a lot more attractive as a human being and what would Cassandra think of somebody who actually believed her?).
But Simmons is not content to combine up Greek epic poetry and quantum physics, but also throws in Shakespeare's play "The Tempest" and even more literature into the mix. If anything, the attempt is already overly ambitious at that point and we still have all of those additional elements like the moravecs and voynix on the science fiction side of the equation. I end up thinking that more would be less because all of this is too much. Maybe the second time through I will be able to better pick up how it all fits together better, but right now that idea is rather daunting.
Speaking as a student of mythology I will say that I really liked how Simmons played out his revision of the "Iliad." I had noted in my review of "Ilium" that there was a point where clearly we were not in the "Iliad" anymore, so when Hockenberry noted that this was literarily the case because what was happening was from Virgil's "Aeneid," that was my biggest laugh in reading "Olympos." Beyond that I really liked the idea that the invulnerability of Achilles, son of Peleus, came not from being dipped in the River Styx or having his mortality burned away (except for the heel in both cases), but from being a quantum singularity who is "fated" to be killed by Paris (and also by not being the son of Peleus). Once Paris is dead, Achilles is doing well. I also liked the scientific explanation for why he falls hoplessly in love with the Amazon Queen Penthesilea and what Achilles does about that love after he kills her (I really liked the idea that Penthesilea is armed with the knowledge of Achilles' fatal flaw and realizes at the key moment that she does not know WHICH heel to strike).
Ultimately the problem for me is simply that I never cared about any chapter that did not have Achilles, Hockenberry, or the gods in it (I hung in there with Odysseus for a while, but the more he became Noman it seemed the less I was interested). As interested as I was in the parts playing with mythology I would find myself zoning out way too often while reading the other parts of the novel. Since only one of the three worked for me and it really did not come together in a way that completed a sense of wonder at the massive narrative, that became the logic by which I came up with my rating for this book. I still think "Olympos" is worth reading, especially after you have invested time in "Ilium," but also because of what he does in making the "Iliad" his own.
Discussions entre clients
|
Le forum concernant ce produit
Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
|
![[Commencer la discussion]](http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/08/x-locale/communities/discussion_boards/start-new-discussion-sec._V192553935_.gif){kind=small}
Listmania!
|
|
Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique
Rechercher des articles similaires par thème
Commentaires
|
