Scalia and Garner's Reading Law et plus d'un million d'autres livres sont disponibles pour le Kindle d'Amazon. En savoir plus

Identifiez-vous pour activer la commande 1-Click.
Amazon Rachète votre article
Recevez un chèque-cadeau de EUR 8,08
Amazon Rachète cet article
Plus de choix
Vous l'avez déjà ? Vendez votre exemplaire ici
Désolé, cet article n'est pas disponible en
Image non disponible pour la
couleur :
Image non disponible

Commencez à lire Scalia and Garner's Reading Law sur votre Kindle en moins d'une minute.

Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici ou téléchargez une application de lecture gratuite.

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts [Anglais] [Relié]

Antonin Scalia , Bryan A. Garner

Prix : EUR 41,44 Livraison à EUR 0,01 En savoir plus.
  Tous les prix incluent la TVA
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Il ne reste plus que 12 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon. Emballage cadeau disponible.
Voulez-vous le faire livrer le samedi 25 octobre ? Choisissez la livraison en 1 jour ouvré sur votre bon de commande. En savoir plus.


Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 28,23  
Relié EUR 41,44  
Vendez cet article - Prix de rachat jusqu'à EUR 8,08
Vendez Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts contre un chèque-cadeau d'une valeur pouvant aller jusqu'à EUR 8,08, que vous pourrez ensuite utiliser sur tout le site Les valeurs de rachat peuvent varier (voir les critères d'éligibilité des produits). En savoir plus sur notre programme de reprise Amazon Rachète.

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Produits fréquemment achetés ensemble

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts + Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges
Acheter les articles sélectionnés ensemble

Les clients ayant acheté cet article ont également acheté

Descriptions du produit

In this groundbreaking book, Scalia and Garner systematically explain all the most important principles of constitutional, statutory, and contractual interpretation in an engaging and informative style with hundreds of illustrations from actual cases. Is a burrito a sandwich? Is a corporation entitled to personal privacy? If you trade a gun for drugs, are you using a gun in a drug transaction? The authors grapple with these and dozens of equally curious questions while explaining the most principled, lucid, and reliable techniques for deriving meaning from authoritative texts. Meanwhile, the book takes up some of the most controversial issues in modern jurisprudence. What, exactly, is "textualism?" Why is "strict construction" a bad thing? What is the true doctrine of "originalism?" And which is more important: the spirit of the law, or the letter? The authors write with a well-argued point of view that is definitive yet nuanced, straightforward yet sophisticated.

Détails sur le produit

En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) 4.3 étoiles sur 5  43 commentaires
167 internautes sur 182 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Concise, Thoughtful, and in places even Humorous 27 juin 2012
Par Eros Faust - Publié sur
I write this on the evening before the Supreme Court's expected ruling on the fate of the Affordable Health Care Act (a/k/a Obamacare) because I don't want the decision in that case to color my favorable opinion of the book, which it might.

Justice Scalia is well known, but Bryan Garner, the co-author and the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, is less so. They have collaborated on a prior book, The Art of Persuading Judges, which I liked, and I like this book even more. I don't think it is intended to be read cover-to-cover like the prior book, but as a condensation of the principles of constitutional and statutory interpretation, it is unrivaled. You could read cases for decades and not get as clear an understanding of how to interpret them as you would from thumbing through this book while attempting to interpret a particular statute.

The first 51 pages, which include the Introduction and Principles Applicable to All Texts fall into the category of exposition on theories of interpretation. It is humorous in places. For example, at one point the authors quote from a constitutional scholar who says "the language structure, and history of law serve best as mediums [sic.] of restraint rather than excuses for intrusion." The use of the Latin abbreviation "sic." for "sic erat scriptum" or "thus was it written" leads you to punchline contained in the footnote which says "unless the passage refers to clairvoyants, media is the proper term." I'm not sure if that is Scalia's or Garner's work on display, but I still found it funny.

In short, it is recommended for anyone who must interpret statutes. I consider it more a reference than an exposition, but one that save readers gobs of time when deciding what a statute does, or should mean.
42 internautes sur 49 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 A Rich Guidebook 30 août 2012
Par C. E. Hughes - Publié sur
I practice law in the areas of probate litigation and estate planning. For almost twenty years I argued probate cases before judges who ultimately had to interpret the meaning of probate statutes and a legal document (a trust for instance). Two years ago I quit litigation and devoted my practice to preventative law--that is, I am attempting on behalf of my clients to either prevent probate litigation with carefully drafted documents, resolve probate disputes outside of court with carefully customized probate ADR agreements, or contain litigation in court with the most carefully drafted estate planning documents I can write--documents that judges cannot misinterpret. I recently had one of my documents tested in the Utah Supreme Court, where the Court unanimously (5-0) found that the text was clear and unambiguous on the dispute in issue and overturned the trial court's decision to the contrary. A frustrating case in that I thought my writing was clear enough for the trial court to understand.

Then I read yesterday's WSJ review on Justice Scalia's and Mr. Garner's book "Reading Law" (I wish Amazon would give reviewers a little more control in utilizing underlining or italics.) I bought a copy last night and have not been able to put it down.

This book is a goldmine for drafters of legal documents. The fundamental, semantic, syntactic, and contextual canons are not only fascinating to read, but are providing eminently practical drafting guidelines that have me intellectually hopping for joy. This book has already taken its place within handreach of my beloved Ninth Edition Black's Law Dictionary (thank you, Mr. Garner), my Chicago Manual of Style (thanks again for Mr. Garner's contributions), and my battered twenty-year-old Roget's Thesaurus.

I am only one-third through the book (underlining, underlining, underlining), but I cannot help going back to some of my documents this afternoon and improving them in specific detail based solely on what I have read so far in this wonderful book. I am looking forward to reading the book over dinners, breakfasts, and lunches in the next few days.

Just the section titled "Principals Applicable to All Texts" should make this book required reading for a host of people: law students in their writing courses, legistators, attorneys in legislative offices overseeing the drafting of statutes, judges, and just plain old transactional attorneys like me who eschew boilerplate forms and instead want to draft their own careful documents benefitting their clients.

Thank you to the authors for this interesting and deeply practical book. I am not sure Justice Scalia and Mr. Garner intended (!) the book to be a manual for drafters of legal documents, but it has already become an indispensable drafing manual for me.
87 internautes sur 110 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 A Phenomenal Book 29 juillet 2012
Par DC Comics Fan - Publié sur
Being a graduate of both of MIT and the University of Michigan Law School, I have nothing but the utmost respect for the legal mind of Justice Scalia. While I may not agree with everyone of his votes while on the Supreme Court, I am in 100% agreement with using Textualism and Originalism in deciding constitutional law cases. At time where judges confuse their roles and attempt to subvert the Constitution's clear language and meaning, this book is a breath of fresh air. Highly recommended!
8 internautes sur 10 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 America's judicial religion: A book every American should read 22 janvier 2013
Par Kurt S. Schulzke - Publié sur
My professional interest as an attorney originally attracted me to Reading Law. Having finished the first 107 pages, I enthusiastically echo another Amazon reviewer who wrote, "This book is a goldmine for drafters of legal documents. The fundamental, semantic, syntactic, and contextual canons are not only fascinating to read, but are providing eminently practical drafting guidelines that have me intellectually hopping for joy."

But Reading Law is not just for attorneys. Every American should read this book, in part to create accountability among judges at every level of government. Every American should know how judges should interpret the vast array of statutes and regulations now so deeply embedded in the fabric of American life. Judges should read it, obviously. So should legislators, many of whom are legal laymen needing better understanding of how their legislation should be read and it should fit within the template of federal and state constitutions. Yet, ordinary Americans, those whose lives and livelihoods are later judged against legislative standards may need this book even more, to anticipate how they will be judged and, later, to comprehend why.
15 internautes sur 20 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 A Must Read for Serious Lawyers - Serious Lawyers, not Egg-Sucking, Bottom-Feeding, Hallway Trash. 23 septembre 2012
Par Amazon Customer - Publié sur
Format:Relié|Achat vérifié
To be the very best attorneys we can be, we must study. Don't ever hire a lawyer who has never read a case - without being paid to read it - since law school. Right? Thus, for attorneys committed to their professions, this book is essential.

I think my colleagues who dislike Scalia don't like his manner - his aloof, imperious, wheezy, almighty law-professor aura. We all remember that from law school and we detest it. Right? The real criticism isn't his devotion to textualism, it's our natural dislike for inflexible, close-minded people. Scalia is certainly that. (God help me if I ever appear before him...).

But the book is compelling. The Canons of statutory interpretation section is very useful, and very handy for legal subjects where statutes are bandied about constantly, and at every level (as they are with immigration law, for example). This section is where Garner's hand is most discernible, discussions of English usage are clear, bright, and rich with possibilities. And Garner's writing is a pleasure to read: as smooth and rich as oil. This is what you buy the book for.

Scalia is most prominent in the very lengthy introduction, with it's dogmatic insistence on textualist sensibilities. It's almost offensive. We feel almost as though we're being scolded from the bench, yes? Scalia is really answering his critics here much more than he is trying to enlighten the reader.

I'd be willing to bet that Garner strongly advised a heavy edit in the introduction, maybe to half the length, but was unsuccessful. And Scalia doesn't really write all that well either... it's not an elegant style. Reading Scalia is like trying to land a golf ball on a boulder-strewn fairway: uncomfortable, and downright trying at times. Many lawyers and judges find the "content" of his opinion (and other) writing objectionable, but I feel it'd be much easier to swallow if the "form" of the writing weren't so ponderous, and almost oppressive at times...

But the Canons of Construction section will stand you in good stead when you're writing briefs and memos. Buy the book, read half the introduction, then read the Canons section. Keep it close at hand when you're writing. It's good background, good fortification for serious, scholarly attorneys. (People Magazine will suffice for the rest of you...)

The book probably would have been better if Garner had written it alone, but it's still very much worth having. Even Scalia haters will like the book (c'mon, huh? The guy is from Trenton, after all...).
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?