Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

 
 
 

Essai gratuit

Découvrez gratuitement un extrait de ce titre

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Tout le monde peut lire les livres Kindle, même sans un appareil Kindle, grâce à l'appli Kindle GRATUITE pour les smartphones, les tablettes et les ordinateurs.
Scalia: A Court of One
 
Agrandissez cette image
 

Scalia: A Court of One [Format Kindle]

Bruce Allen Murphy

Prix éditeur - format imprimé : EUR 27,26
Prix Kindle : EUR 18,79 TTC & envoi gratuit via réseau sans fil par Amazon Whispernet
Économisez : EUR 8,47 (31%)

Formats

Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 18,79  
Relié EUR 27,58  
-40%, -50%, -60%... Découvrez les Soldes Amazon jusqu'au 5 août 2014 inclus. Profitez-en !





Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

“A deeply probing biography of the controversial Supreme Court justice. . . . Murphy moves case by case in an evenhanded, thoroughgoing study.” (Kirkus Reviews)

“[A] penetrating biography. . . . Murphy's thoughtful analysis of Scalia's intellectual journey shows just how difficult it is to straitjacket the Constitution within a narrow interpretation.” (Publishers Weekly)

Présentation de l'éditeur

An authoritative, deeply researched biography of the most controversial and outspoken Supreme Court justice of our time and how he chose to be “right” rather than influential.

Antonin Scalia knew only success in the first fifty years of his life. His sterling academic and legal credentials led to his nomination by President Ronald Reagan to the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in 1982. In four short years there, he successfully outmaneuvered the more senior Robert Bork to be appointed to the Supreme Court in 1986.

Scalia’s evident legal brilliance and personal magnetism led everyone to predict he would unite a new conservative majority under Chief Justice William Rehnquist and change American law in the process. Instead he became a Court of One. Rather than bringing the conservatives together, Scalia drove them apart. He attacked and alienated his more moderate colleagues Sandra Day O’Connor, then David Souter, and finally Anthony Kennedy. Scalia prevented the conservative majority from coalescing for nearly two decades.

Scalia: A Court of One is the compelling story of one of the most polarizing figures ever to serve on the nation’s highest court. It provides an insightful analysis of Scalia’s role on a Court that, like him, has moved well to the political right, losing public support and ignoring public criticism. To the delight of his substantial conservative following, Scalia’s “originalism” theory has become the litmus test for analyzing, if not always deciding, cases. But Bruce Allen Murphy shows that Scalia’s judicial conservatism is informed as much by his highly traditional Catholicism, mixed with his political partisanship, as by his reading of the Constitution. Murphy also brilliantly analyzes Scalia’s role in major court decisions since the mid-1980s and scrutinizes the ethical controversies that have dogged Scalia in recent years. A Court of One is a fascinating examination of one outspoken justice’s decision not to play internal Court politics, leaving him frequently in dissent, but instead to play for history, seeking to etch his originalism philosophy into American law.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 21592 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 657 pages
  • Editeur : Simon & Schuster (10 juin 2014)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ASIN: B00GEECHQQ
  • Synthèse vocale : Non activée
  • X-Ray :
  •  Souhaitez-vous faire modifier les images ?


En savoir plus sur les auteurs

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Commentaires en ligne 

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 3.5 étoiles sur 5  13 commentaires
57 internautes sur 71 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 The Rob Ford of SCOTUS 10 juin 2014
Par David Wineberg - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle
For about 150 pages of this intense, revealing and quite excellent book, Antonin "Nino" Scalia is a brilliant student, a hard worker, an unbeatable debater and an all around great guy, "very kind hearted and low key." Scalia was the golden one. As the only child of Italian immigrants, he was spoiled. That none of his aunts and uncles living nearby had any children at all only made it worse. At school, his sterling academic record allowed him the unrestrained praise of everyone. Unfortunately, his Catholic school also instilled in him the rule that it is not possible to separate religious life from intellectual life, which colored his thinking very prejudicially. Still, as a young judge, his digging led to insights and clarity deeper than the average judge's decisions.

But when he got to the Supreme Court at age 50, that all changed overnight. Now the junior justice, he was frustrated at not being the star, not being the leader, not being the pacesetter. This could not be allowed to stand.

In a pathological effort to have the last word in any legal argument, Scalia scoured legal concordances and when that was unsatisfactory, he went to the history books and even fiction - quoting Shakespeare or Orwell as his source - to make a point either different than the other justices, or just differently. He was on a one man crusade to be right, and those who would not join him were criminally wrong. That would often be the entire rest of the court. The result was total polarization, minimal co-operation, and Scalia issuing a dissenting opinion, even when he agreed on the result. According to Murphy, those dissents (called Ninograms or Ninofits) would often be ad hominem attacks on other justices, whose opinions he did not share. This brought the court down to a new, undignified and uncomfortable level of one sided playground fighting. Eventually, other judges responded and retorted. But Scalia always insisted on having the last word, so it was pointless.

When it suited his purposes, Scalia abandoned the law and the Constitution in favor of arguments based on "everybody does it". His dissents sometimes read like editorials rather than judicial logic. He became a Court of One, writing decisions for himself. In order to cement his different approach, he championed a theory that put him in conflict with everyone else: "What was the most plausible meaning of the words of the Constitution to the society that adopted it (as decided by Scalia alone) -regardless of the Framers might secretly have intended it?" This made him attempt to put 21st century America's reality back to 1787, while at the same time ignoring the actual intent of the men who wrote the rules, or the political/social context. This is the judicial equivalent of Einstein's fruitless search for one simple rule to explain the universe. Scalia's "textualism and originalism" theory can only cause grief.

Fellow conservative Judge Richard Posner described it most succinctly: "The range of historical references ... is breathtaking, but it not evidence of disinterested historical inquiry. It is evidence of the ability of well-staffed courts to produce snow jobs."

I found it frustrating that Murphy did not provide a scorecard. While he did show that other conservative justices voted along with Scalia less every year, he never showed how many dissents Scalia wrote, and what percentage of the total cases heard that represented every year. Because Murphy could just be obsessing on the numerous outrageous acts by Scalia. And though I doubt they are merely exceptions to suit this book, I would have liked to know the overall depth of the disaster. Murphy also spends too much ink on setups and repetition, reintroducing people and events several times. Nonetheless, he does a magnificent job showing how Scalia "evolved" from decade to decade, and what that meant for jurisprudence in those years.

The obvious irony of it all is that Scalia made an absolute conservative majority when he took his seat in 1986. He aggravated, insulted, divided and split the conservatives, pushing them to the center, and so obviated any possibility of achieving his conservative goals. All by himself. And was bitter about it!

Scalia's antics on the bench and in public served to polarize and politicize the Supreme Court, most notably in Gore v. Bush, where the five Republican appointees outvoted the four Democrats to decide the presidential election by themselves. That politicization is shameful, demeaning and belittling to an important, impartial institution, and a horrible legacy Scalia does not for a moment acknowledge. He brooks no criticism from any quarter. In his words, he doesn't care; he has "tenure."

Another low blow was his overt plan for the Chief Justice's spot. Even as Rehnquist was ailing, Scalia, under the watchful eye of his declared fan GW Bush, began openly campaigning for Rehnquist's job, further debasing the currency of the court. His decisions and dissents that year were colored by it, confusing his declining number of admirers. It was so embarrassing he wasn't even shortlisted.

Scalia is clearly working to become the most famous Supreme Court Justice in history. Unfortunately, that fame will be due to his lack of co-operation, his need to be the leader regardless of how he got there, and the resulting torture for the American people with the often incomprehensible decisions. He will not be remembered kindly or grandly.

Don't shoot the messenger.

David Wineberg
6 internautes sur 6 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 A Remarkable Study of Justice Scalia: perceptive; incisive; comprehensive 6 juillet 2014
Par Ronald H. Clark - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié|Achat vérifié
This is the fourth judicial study by Professor Murphy I have read. The three previous volumes I felt excessively focused on sensational dimensions of their subjects, especially the volumes on Justices Fortas and William O. Douglas (" Wild Bill"). Not to say these were not substantial studies, but the sensational elements detracted attention from Murphy's solid scholarship. I am delighted to say that I have no such qualms about this substantial (500 pages plus notes and bibliography) and extremely valuable bio of Justice Antonin Scalia. It is outstanding in a number of ways.

For me, the book's greatest asset is its meticulous analysis of how Justice Scalia developed his various interpretive theories--probably his most lasting achievement. One can read long articles on this topic, but what Murphy has done is to trace this development over time, context by context, as the bio unfolds. I found myself having a much more comprehensive understanding of Scalia's approaches (yes, he does "evolve" over time) than before. For Scalia and judicial conservatives generally, methodology is everything. Murphy also carefully differentiates Scalia's positions from those of Judge Bork and Justice Thomas, as well as others.

Murphy also tackles the toughest issue about Scalia--could he have been a more influential figure? On the one hand, clearly his originalist theory has had a substantial impact on how the Constitution is interpreted by judges, scholars, and others. Yet, on the other, his explosive personality relative to his Court colleagues has cost him the ability to become the conservative leader of the Court. Justice Kennedy and (Murphy suggests after the Obamacare decision) the Chief Justice may now rightly claim that title. Yet, although Scalia can charm many birds out of their trees, Murphy suggests that his attacks on colleagues and controversial speeches cost him whatever little chance he had of succeeding Rehnquist as Chief in 2005. A very interesting issue.

One measure of solid judicial biography is whether you feel you have a solid grasp on the personality of the subject. Murphy scores in this category as well. He carefully follows Scalia through his youth, legal education, early practice career, academic teaching, and eventually into government service. His chapters on Scalia's service in the Office of Legal Counsel at DOJ during the Ford Administrative afforded me helpful insights into his undying dedication to the expansion of presidential power--which still pops up from time to time. His views on regulation developed during his stay at the Administrative Conference and the American Enterprise Institute are important to understanding his views as a Justice. The only thing missing from Murphy's analysis is much about Scalia's family/private life, with the exception of Murphy's diligent examination of the role of Scalia's Roman Catholicism in impacting his character and judicial behavior. With now six Catholic justices, five of whom are generally quite conservative, this is a crucial topic which Murphy treats with scholarly professionalism.

There are many other pluses to the book as well. Murphy selects the cases he discusses carefully, and integrates them into his narrative so smoothly that general readers will grasp his points. Murphy certainly includes some critics of Scalia as well, especially Judge Posner who continues to wield a highly critical pen regarding Scalia, and pretty much deconstructed Scalia's major book, "Reading Law.". Murphy also takes on several crucial issues relating to Scalia's conduct on and off the Court. Especially the issue of what standards govern judicial recusals by Justices becomes important given the calls for Scalia to recuse himself after his famous hunting trip with Vice President Cheney. A related topic is what limits should Justices follow in making public statements that relate to the Court. An avid maker of speeches and public comments, Scalia has been repeatedly criticized for discussing his views on issues that might come before the Court.

This is a book where you need to read the end notes as you go along. Murphy discusses some of his most important insights in the notes (e.g., judicial recusals); since there are 75 pages of notes, there is much buried treasure found therein. His extensive bibliography, covering books, interviews, oral histories, speeches and public appearances, archive collections, and internet sources is enormously helpful. So we now have two fine book-length studies of Scalia, Murphy's and Joan Biskupic's "American Original." While many such as myself will remain critical of Scalia and his interpretive theories, we are now at least in a much better position to understand this most perplexing Justice as he approaches 80.
11 internautes sur 14 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 well researched and well written 24 juin 2014
Par Andrew Boufford - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Relié
I will admit I have not finished the book. I am a little over a hundred pages into it. In fact, I am at the point of his appointment to SCOTUS. I am also a liberal, and came into this endeavor not a big fan of Scalia's. However, as a result of reading this biography I find myself liking the man. Don't get me wrong, I am not a convert, however, it is hard not to respect and admire his intellect and sharp legal mind. I am not an originalist either, but I do find myself fascinated by his approach to constitutional interpretation, an approach that has to be taken seriously. It may be premature to write this, but I felt compelled based on some of the reviews that I think are just unfair. One reviewer made the assertion that the book is not well researched. I respectfully disagree. The endnotes are extensive and Murphy used a wide range of sources, both primary and secondary. He spent 8 years researching the book. Keep in mind this is an intellectual biography focusing in on Scalia's jurisprudence. The author looked at the dozens of public interviews with Scalia, the dozens of speeches and public appearances, and the endless number of opinions he wrote as a justice and circuit court judge. Most of this material is open source material and part of the public record. Not sure a personal interview with the author would shed any more light on his judicial philosophy. Anyway, for what its worth, that's my take thus far.
6 internautes sur 8 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 A Critique more than Biography 1 juillet 2014
Par ernest schusky - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle
When I heard about this book' I could hardly wait for it because I thought it would confirm my prejudices about Scalia. Murphy does share my bias, but I was disappointed that he at times failed to provide evidence for his accusations of Scalia's biases. Indeed, I felt in some places the book was more polemic than factual, and at times (not for very long) I felt sympahty for Scalia.

I did find the book valuable for its explanation of Scalia's doctrine of "originalism''. However, it strikes me as more than coincidental that Scalia can find the Founding Father's more often than not supporting Catholic doctrine when there was considerable antipathy toward the religion during Colonial times.
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Riveting, fascinating, hard to put down. Made ... 14 juillet 2014
Par Kindle Customer - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle
Riveting, fascinating, hard to put down. Made me think about Scalia's career and legal philosophy in a new way. I may not agree with him on most issues, but reading extensive quotes from his opinions and speeches made me think. A highly readable and compelling biography.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Thème:
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier
 

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon
   


Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique