Identifiez-vous pour activer la commande 1-Click.
Plus de choix
Vous l'avez déjà ? Vendez votre exemplaire ici
Désolé, cet article n'est pas disponible en
Image non disponible pour la
couleur :
Image non disponible

Dites-le à l'éditeur :
J'aimerais lire ce livre sur Kindle !

Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici ou téléchargez une application de lecture gratuite.

The Case of Peter Pan: Or the Impossibility of Children's Fiction [Anglais] [Broché]

Jacqueline Rose

Prix : EUR 15,90 Livraison à EUR 0,01 En savoir plus.
  Tous les prix incluent la TVA
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Il ne reste plus que 7 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon. Emballage cadeau disponible.
Voulez-vous le faire livrer le mardi 23 septembre ? Choisissez la livraison en 1 jour ouvré sur votre bon de commande. En savoir plus.


Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Relié --  
Broché EUR 15,90  
Broché --  

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Détails sur le produit

En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Dans ce livre (En savoir plus)
Première phrase
We have been reading the wrong Freud to children. Lire la première page
En découvrir plus
Parcourir les pages échantillon
Couverture | Copyright | Table des matières | Extrait | Index | Quatrième de couverture
Rechercher dans ce livre:

Vendre une version numérique de ce livre dans la boutique Kindle.

Si vous êtes un éditeur ou un auteur et que vous disposez des droits numériques sur un livre, vous pouvez vendre la version numérique du livre dans notre boutique Kindle. En savoir plus

Commentaires en ligne 

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 1.7 étoiles sur 5  6 commentaires
18 internautes sur 24 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 rigorous, intelligent work 31 janvier 2005
Par another reader - Publié sur Amazon.com
This book is a very well-written and brilliantly argued engagement with an important and under-theorized topic. If you like literary theoretical work that challenges assumptions about childhood, desire, culture, and reading, you should check the book out. On the other hand, if you aren't into psychoanalytic work, this book will not be your cup of tea. In the book Rose discusses the way in which Peter Pan has become a cultural phenomenon unto itself, and argues that the obsession with innocence and eternal childhood reveals not something about children necessarily, but rather something about the investment adults have in childhood. Rose wants to interrogate children's fiction as a phenomenon produced by adults. She is very concerned about the specter of child abuse, and this book is her contribution to understanding this phenomenon and its proliferation better. This may be a difficult set of ideas for many to understand, since her argument flies in the face of deeply-cherished assumptions about childhood (many of which indeed play a part in the deep problems our culture has in ethical relations to children). But it is precisely this phenomenon of emotional and peremptory devotion to the idea of innocence that Rose argues gets in the way of a useful understanding of how child sexual abuse operates. This book also delves into the history of Peter Pan and children's fiction in general, which is fascinating.
14 internautes sur 31 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
1.0 étoiles sur 5 Deocorum Please 11 juin 2001
Par Un client - Publié sur Amazon.com
Jacqueline Rose has done some serious scholarship in literary criticism, but this work is dubious, at best. I'm not sure why she misses the mark so poorly in this extended essay on the link between children's fiction and the publishing industry. But the work is very un-focused and rather trite. The approach is a bit dated, and I can imagine that perhaps the book is more an extended discourse on the theoretical apparatus that she seems to be enamored with rather than a solid interpretation of Peter Pan. The book is really an odd one, and it left me feeling so disgusted that I did not wish to finish the tome. Although, the other reviewers are a bit too vituperative in their critique, this book really strikes me as somewhat immature.
11 internautes sur 26 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
1.0 étoiles sur 5 Odd Treatment of Old Genre 16 octobre 2000
Par Un client - Publié sur Amazon.com
Rose's analysis is dubious. She attempts to make the claim that Barrie created a new genre of fantasy with the publication of Peter Pan. The problem is that Barrie's books about Peter Pan are actually components of a genre well-studied and documented for hundreds of years. Even a cursory read of scholarship in folklore would have clearly demonstrated to Rose that Peter Pan is a Marchen, a genre of folklore in which a poor, obscure hero is called to complete acts of bravery in a land of fantasy and magic. There are numerous other problems with her analysis. Even reading this study as an essay on contemporary social issues is a confusing exercise, at best, because Rose's style tends to obfuscate rather than to provide any semblance of clarity. Sorry to be so critical of literary criticism, but incoherence and bad writing simply do not belong in scholarly discourse.
13 internautes sur 30 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
1.0 étoiles sur 5 Agreed -- Don't Read It 26 janvier 1999
Par Un client - Publié sur Amazon.com
The book is absurd. Rose reifies "culture," assuming that it is a property of "children" or "adults." As a result, she fails to recognize that the process of enculturation is actually a sharing of cultural resources rather than a colonialist imposition of cultural hegemony. Furthermore in using Freudian psychoanalysis, she undermines her counterhegemonic cultural critique, as Freud, himself, maintained a view that "the child" is less than the civilized adult. As a result of these two fatal errors, her analysis is bogus.
12 internautes sur 29 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
1.0 étoiles sur 5 If you don't read one book this year, this should be it! 5 mai 1998
Par Un client - Publié sur Amazon.com
I am amazed that a book this bad was even written, let alone published and bought. Rose develops an incoherent analysis of children's literature that is an olio of deconstructionist literature theory, formalism, psychoanalytical musing, and neomarxism. The main argument, if there is one, is that children's literature is a form of child molestation. This book is an insult to the agony of the millions of children who suffer from the devasting psychological consequences of child molestation. As this book is sometimes assigned in courses in cultural studies, it is a sad indicator of how inane attempts to be provocative are now passing for "scholarship." Why can't books be given negative scores?
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?