Commencez à lire The Climate Caper: Facts and Fallacies of Global Warming sur votre Kindle dans moins d'une minute. Vous n'avez pas encore de Kindle ? Achetez-le ici Ou commencez à lire dès maintenant avec l'une de nos applications de lecture Kindle gratuites.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

 
 
 

Essai gratuit

Découvrez gratuitement un extrait de ce titre

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Tout le monde peut lire les livres Kindle, même sans un appareil Kindle, grâce à l'appli Kindle GRATUITE pour les smartphones, les tablettes et les ordinateurs.
The Climate Caper: Facts and Fallacies of Global Warming
 
Agrandissez cette image
 

The Climate Caper: Facts and Fallacies of Global Warming [Format Kindle]

Garth W. Paltridge , Christopher Monckton

Prix conseillé : EUR 7,77 De quoi s'agit-il ?
Prix éditeur - format imprimé : EUR 8,53
Prix Kindle : EUR 5,44 TTC & envoi gratuit via réseau sans fil par Amazon Whispernet
Économisez : EUR 3,09 (36%)

Formats

Prix Amazon Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle EUR 5,44  
Broché EUR 8,80  
Broché EUR 13,17  
Chaque jour, un ebook avec au moins 60% de réduction
Découvrez l'Offre Éclair Kindle et inscrivez-vous à la Newsletter Offre Éclair Kindle pour ne rater aucun ebook à prix exceptionnel. Abonnez-vous dès maintenant



Le Pack de la Rentrée : 24 applis offertes, plus de 50 euros d'économies, jusqu'au 4 septembre sur l'App-Shop pour Android. Profitez-en et partagez la nouvelle. En savoir plus.


Descriptions du produit

Présentation de l'éditeur

So you think the theory of disastrous climate change has been proven? You believe that scientists are united in their efforts to force the nations of the world to reduce their carbon emissions? You imagine perhaps that scientists are far too professional to overstate their case?

Maybe we should all think again. In The Climate Caper, written with a light touch and presented in a nicely readable manner, Garth Paltridge shows that the case for action against climate change is not nearly so clear cut as is presented to politicians and the public. He leads us through the massive uncertainties that are inherently part of the "climate modeling process"; he examines the even greater uncertainties associated with economic forecasts of climatic doom; and he discusses in detail the conscious and subconscious forces operating to ensure that skepticism within the scientific community is kept from the public eye.

Paltridge concludes that governments are indeed becoming captive to a scientific and technological elite—an elite that achieves its ends by manipulating the public through fear of climate change, creating the world's greatest example of a "religion" for the politically correct.

Détails sur le produit


En savoir plus sur l'auteur

Découvrez des livres, informez-vous sur les écrivains, lisez des blogs d'auteurs et bien plus encore.

Commentaires en ligne 

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoiles
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.2 étoiles sur 5  9 commentaires
32 internautes sur 39 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Powerful, understated evidence 6 août 2009
Par Ron House - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché
This is a reasonably short work, very different from Ian Plimer's Heaven and Earth. Although Paltridge is an atmospheric physicist and erstwhile Chief Research Scientist with Australia's CSIRO, he has put together an accessible summary of some of the damning evidence against the global warming alarmism.

Paltridge has an interesting style. He writes in a quiet, understated tone, whilst making fatal attacks on the warming doctrine. From the very brief overview of the IPCC process (with the recommendation committee charging ahead before the scientific committees had had time to collect any avidence or make any findings), he proceeds to a layman's introduction to some physics. His main message here is how much is still unknown about climate processes. In this I disagree with his presentation, because some basic 'outer envelope' considerations do show, in my opinion, how extremely unlikely the IPCC's forecasts really are.

He moves on to some economics questions, and here he is devastating, but in his usual understated style. On the Australian Government's own Garnaut Report findings, Australians of 100 years hence will be four times better off than we are, and yet we are being asked to impoverish ourselves to save them a ten percent reduction in their living standards. Given the uncertainty in any of these forecasts, the policies being promoted now are in the lunatic fringe, but Paltridge leaves it to us to come to that conclusion.

Then in a chapter on sociology, he shows how a complete society can be led into turning a delusion into public policy and common 'knowledge'. At this point even the sedate and quiet Paltridge has to acknowledge that the warming madness has more in common with religion than science.

He then addresses how the scientific process itself has been subverted and in many cases rendered inoperative. That is a hard case to sell because it is more vague than the bald fact that the IPCC forecasts can be shown to be wrong, period. However, I believe it is at least as important because we are in the process of bequeathing to our descendants a world that has lost the ability to do real science and gain wisdom. It will lose its freedom too, but that's another matter.

What is missing from this book - and it might be a positive or a negative, depending on your reasons for reading - is any mention of the fact of geological history that for the past 2.5 million years our planet has been yo-yoing into and out of ice ages (spending roughly 90% of the time in them), and the successive ice periods are deeper and colder, whilst successive warm periods are less warm; and the regular schedule has us down for another ice age right now. The book's message seems to be "The global warming claims are not a cause for concern." But that is not going far enough in my opinion. There really is a big cause for concern, namely that the alarmism is recommending exactly the most dangerous policy for human life, wild life and the planet's health in general, in that it suggests trying to cool the climate just as it is about to slip into what the regular-as-clockwork geologic history would suggest will be a planetary killer of an ice age.

Paltridge doesn't mention this. Maybe he thinks it is uncertain, maybe he thinks talking about that would be a 'bridge too far' for nervous readers. Either way, the book is a bit timid for my taste, although hard-hitting in spite of that. But I can imagine there would be many readers for whom it would be exactly the reality clarifier that I think Paltridge wants it to be. The final chapter is both depressing and concerning, and rightly so. I cannot understand anyone who could continue boasting about 'reducing my carbon footprint' after reading this.

Finally, my pet peeve, the book has no index. It is probably less of a problem for such a short book, but I don't think any author is doing his hard work justice by stopping 5% short of perfection.
10 internautes sur 13 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Much ado about nothing much 15 août 2011
Par Rafe Champion - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché
This book explains how the prospect of mild global warming has been beaten up to become "the greatest moral challenge of our times" in the words of the ex-PM of Australia.

Emeritus Professor Garth Paltridge is an atmospheric physicist, previously a Chief Research Scientist with the CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and more recently Director of the Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies. He is Visiting Fellow at the Australian National University and a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science.

He provides historical perspective because he was involved in climate science from the beginning of interest in warming, he was close to the epicentre of the explosion in the IPCC and he explains how the scientific committees of that body became subservient to the political committee.

On the science of warming he provides a luminously clear explanation of the problems with the models that provide the core of the case for alarm.

In the Australian policy-making process he was very close to the action when the chief advisor to the Government encouraged a committee from the Academy of Science to water down some potentially damning criticisms of the model he was using as the basis of the proposals that have been taken up by the Administration.

He understands enough of the sociology of science to understand the significance of the rise of Big Science, almost entirely government-funded, and the parallel proliferation of Kuhnian "normal scientists".

As a bonus the book is short and very clearly written with a light and humorous touch.

He wrote "There is a fair amount of reasonable science behind the global warming debate, but in general, and give or take a religion or two, never has quite so much rubbish been espoused by so many on so little evidence. The "consensus" amounts to the view that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere will be associated with a higher temperature than otherwise, in the order of a degree or so in the rest the century. "it is certainly not the consensus of the majority of scientists that the actual impact on humans will be significant - or indeed that it will be detrimental."

It is critically important to understand the problems with the computerized forecasting models which are the basis for predictions of future ecological disasters. Many factors are inserted in the computer models and to get close to a match with observed values you have to insert some "tuneable parameters as well. A tuneable parameter is a piece of input information whose actual value is chosen on no basis other than to ensure that the theoretical simulation matches observation.

Paltridge reports that the twenty or so leading models calculate global-average temperatures that range several degrees about the observed value of 15 degrees C. (p 21) Several degrees! It gets worse when you try to predict other things like rainfall (a central feature of the model that is driving Australian policy).

Using the collection of models to predict future rainfall in Australia, the average outcome was a small increase. But the Government advisor used a model which predicted a substantial decrease and this drives the current "carbon tax" policy.

Paltridge recounts that climate research became institutionalised as a formal international program in the 1970s when it evolved out of the programme of the World Meteorological Organization. The new program did not have a specific focus (until the political program of the IPCC provided one) and it did not have a hard core, an "experimental centrepiece" where progress could be demonstrated.
Governments will fund research that delivers huge human or economic benefits (a cure for cancer, or cheap carbon-free power), or projects that scientists manage to convince them are sexy in a fundamental scientific sense (hadron colliders). At that stage climate science lacked human implications, economic benefits, and an exciting or progressing scientific program.

So during the eighties and early nineties there began what Paltridge called "an almost subconscious search" for a rationale for more increase in less time. This involved massive computer models which could take years to develop and run to obtain results.

"Different modelers developed their own particular ways of simulating the processes determining climate and used as well their own values of tuneable parameters. Thus emerged a highly satisfying spread of the forecasts of the likely rise in the Earth's temperature over the next hundred years. Some were as high as six or seven degrees." What is highly satisfying about the spread of the forecasts? Some would regard this as a reason to take the whole venture with a very large amount of salt. The point is that the spread enabled people to use the higher values as though they are credible.

Paltridge pointed out that people have intuitive ideas about the value of different models and most know in their bones that some are just over the top, but there is no killer argument against any of them. And so arose the practice, no doubt subconsciously, of quoting the range of forecasts without discussion of their relative merits. At the same time a parallel program developed of ecological studies of the impact of climate change. Paltridge displays barely concealed horror at the quality of some of this research (by ecological activists?)

"Suffice it to say that there arose enough semi-scientific myth and legend about the possible detrimental effects of small climate changes that it was easy to contemplate doomsday in the face of somebody's mooted six or seven degree rise in global temperature. The old adage of bad data are worse than no data was largely forgotten."

Enter the IPCC. Concerns about the effects of climate change prompted the establishment of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. This has three separate international working groups (1) on the science behind the predictions (2) on the potential impacts and (3) the possibilities for political and social responses. "Right from the outset is was clear that only the third group was really significant...The main reason for the existence of the other two working groups is to lend gravitas and respectability to the essentially political deliberations of the third."

Summaries of the research are released regularly "with much fanfare". Each of the successive summaries has been stronger on the dangers, not because of any particular advance of the science. "Rather, it is a function of how strongly a statement about global warming can be put without inviting a significant backlash from the general scientific community."

The author explains the how the combination of political pressures, modern content-free managers and the professional imperatives of the scientific community have created the impression of consensus on "settled science" which in fact does not exist. The illusion persists because dissenters have been marginalized by mostly unfair means. The bank of credibility that science enjoys may be seriously run down by this episode, not to mention the collateral damage to the economies of nations that stampede into activities that serve very little useful purpose at ruinous expense.
3 internautes sur 3 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Old guys rule (in climatology) 3 octobre 2013
Par Andrew Griffiths - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché|Achat vérifié
This book explains how science has been overtaken by politics in the study of climate, doubters are labelled deniers without any attempt to address genuine problems with the mainstream IPCC view pushed by media,learned academies and journals such as Nature. Skeptics tend to be older scientists who are retired or ready to be pushed out and can be easily dismissed as has beens by the established order who rely on computer models,sit at desks and deflect observational data that does not fit their models.

The book is somewhat light in style,easy reading for the general reader;I wanted more content,more revelations,but what can you expect for $10.
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Clear and concise 9 mai 2014
Par Robert Shaw - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Broché|Achat vérifié
This book gives what the news leaves out. Did you know there has been no global warming for over 15 years or that they found an active volcano under the ice in Antarctica?
0 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 I've read much on Climate Change, but Garth Paltridge ... 30 juin 2014
Par JOHN QUILTY - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format:Format Kindle|Achat vérifié
I've read much on Climate Change, but Garth Paltridge provides the most concise, readable and enlightening perspectives I've come across.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ?   Dites-le-nous

Passages les plus surlignés

 (Qu'est-ce que c'est ?)
&quote;
great slabs of the computer code of a model are often exchanged between research groups so as to avoid writing the stuff from scratch. &quote;
Marqué par 3 utilisateurs Kindle
&quote;
how can a reviewer of a research paper reporting results from the trials of a particular model make any assessment of those results other than to base his opinion on whether or not they fall in line with the results of other models? This &quote;
Marqué par 3 utilisateurs Kindle
&quote;
No scientist outside the closed engineering shop of the numerical modelling community can ever really hope to assess whether or not the physical representations within them are acceptable. &quote;
Marqué par 3 utilisateurs Kindle

Discussions entre clients

Le forum concernant ce produit
Discussion Réponses Message le plus récent
Pas de discussions pour l'instant

Posez des questions, partagez votre opinion, gagnez en compréhension
Démarrer une nouvelle discussion
Thème:
Première publication:
Aller s'identifier
 

Rechercher parmi les discussions des clients
Rechercher dans toutes les discussions Amazon
   


Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique