Tractatus Logico-PhilosophicusI am searching in Knowledge Management, with the following philosophy:
Between actors, what actual rules are in presence according to goal system and goal mission?
The book:
From the facts constructed by words according to Wittgenstein, I would rather extend it to "context" too! Words are constructing context (situtation).
His problematic relies on imperfect language, settling-up his reasoning from perfect language. Consequently, his analysis turns on ruptures or discontinuities issued from imperfect language, issued from tautology and reflexivity.
Further on, my research basis relies on a comparison of french "logic" issued from the french language itself and pragmatism issued from english language itself.
The differences are:
For French: subject and object are separated depriving context notions
For Engish: subject and object are related according to a context
For French: Form is over substance
For English: Substance is over form
Intentions and actions are not constructed in the same way, consequently reflexes are involved.
For French: Tautology is the basis of the language
For English: Tautology is used only in very specific case, in general it has to be avoided!
For French: there is no predicate
For English: there is a predicate "the latter" in the grammar, it allows to construct knowledge from the latest in the past to future.
I have not finished this book, so I would not go further on my analysis, but still would come back with pleasure to tell you more about.
Kind regards
Mrs. Bénédicte Roux
