Commentaires en ligne 


3 évaluations
5 étoiles:    (0)
4 étoiles:
 (3)
3 étoiles:    (0)
2 étoiles:    (0)
1 étoiles:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Moyenne des commentaires client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients
Créer votre propre commentaire
 
 
Du plus utile au moins utile | Du plus récent au plus ancien

2 internautes sur 2 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 A Brief Summary and Review, 14 octobre 2013
Ce commentaire fait référence à cette édition : David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants (Broché)
*A full executive summary of this book will be available at newbooksinbrief dot com, on or before Tuesday, October 22, 2013.

This book is not about underdogs and giants in any conventional sense of these terms. Rather, the book is about the curious nature of advantages and disadvantages, and how each can (under certain circumstances) become its opposite.

The first lesson to be learned is that the things we take to be advantages are often no such thing. Our greatest mistake here comes from the fact that we identify a certain quality or characteristic as being a benefit or advantage, and then assume that the more of it there is the better--when this is often not the case. Put another way, most of us recognize that it is possible to have too much of a good thing, and yet we fail to appreciate just how often and where this principle applies. For instance, we recognize that having a certain amount of money greatly facilitates raising children (it being very difficult to raise a family in a state of poverty), and yet we fail to recognize that beyond a certain point wealth also makes parenting increasingly difficult (for it becomes harder and harder to instill qualities of hard-work and self-control). Or we recognize that small class sizes are a good thing, and yet we fail to recognize that classes can actually begin to suffer once they become too small (since diversity and energy begin to disappear).

Another arena wherein an advantage can become a disadvantage is in power and authority. Power and authority is an advantage, of course; however, when it is wielded illegitimately and without fairness, it can actually cause more chaos, destruction and violence than it curbs. This is as true in the classroom as it is in community policing as it is in handling minority groups within a nation's borders.

The second lesson to be learned here is that certain disadvantages can sometimes drive people into positions of advantage. Take the disadvantage of being born with a disability, for example. Say dyslexia. In our modern world, where the ability to read is extremely important--and practically a requirement for success--having great difficulty with reading is a major disadvantage. And indeed the statistics indicate that the vast majority of those who are born dyslexic end up falling through the cracks and missing out on success.

Still, though, many dyslexics have gone on to become highly successful people; and it has also been noted that in certain fields (such as entrepreneurship) an inordinate proportion of the most successful individuals do, in fact, have dyslexia. So how can we explain these success stories? What we find in these cases is that these individuals have managed to compensate for their disability by developing skills that make up for their flaws (such as an improved memory or debating prowess). Thus, in a way, the successful dyslexic has actually benefited from his disability, because it has forced him into a position where he has had to develop other skills that have led him directly to success.

Also at play here is the fact that dyslexics tend to endure many failures when they are young. Repeated failures (especially at a young age) have the potential to crush the spirit. But they can also have the opposite effect: they can inure the individual to failure, thus making them more likely to take risks and try things that others wouldn't--which is often a sure path to success.

A similar phenomenon also sometimes touches trauma victims. Take the ultimate trauma of losing a parent in childhood, for example. This is one of the worse experiences imaginable, and the trauma of losing a parent in childhood does indeed crush the vast majority of those who have the misfortune of enduring it.

Again, though, it has been noted that a very high proportion of highly successful individuals across many fields (from science to art to politics) have in fact lost a parent in childhood. And what we find in these cases is that the experience has left these individuals with the mind-set that now that they have endured such a terrible event, that nothing could ever be so bad. And thus they are liberated from the fear of failure, and--like the successful dyslexic--are willing to try things and take risks that others are not (which often leads directly to success).

The same experience and logic can also apply to underdog groups. For example, when a group recognizes that it is severely over-matched in terms of skill or strength compared to its opponent, it can begin to feel liberated to try unconventional tactics and approaches. This is often for the best, for it turns out that unconventional tactics and approaches are frequently very effective against giants--in everything from sports, to politics to war--and are, in many cases, the only chance the underdog has to win anyway. Again, then, in both of these instances (the trauma victim and the underdog group) a disadvantage has driven the party into a position of advantage, and thus the disadvantage may itself be seen as a kind of boon.

Gladwell has done well to make us rethink the nature of advantages and disadvantages across many fields. The only major flaw in the book, in my view, is the third and final part. The theme of the part is that power becomes less effective (or even counter-productive) when it is wielded illegitimately. The problem with this argument is that it's a classic case of the straw-man: Gladwell has set up an opposition that is very easy to defeat, and then smashed it to pieces. What's worse is that the examples Gladwell uses to prove his point here are quite weak. Still, there is much of value in the first 2 parts of the book. A full executive summary of the book will be available at newbooksinbrief dot com, on or before Tuesday, October 22; a podcast discussion of the book will be available shortly thereafter.
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles 
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non


4.0 étoiles sur 5 Malcom gladwell remet une fois de plus en cause les idées reçues, 20 janvier 2014
Achat vérifié(De quoi s'agit-il ?)
Ce commentaire fait référence à cette édition : David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants (Broché)
Dans ce livre comme dans les autres Malcom Gladwell nous raconte tout d'abord des histoires qu'il rend passionnantes.
D'autre part les sujets abordés, même s'il ne sont pas d'une portée générale, ils sont brillamment présentés et donnent toujours matière à réflexion.
C'est toujours un plaisir de lire ses livres
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles 
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non


4.0 étoiles sur 5 Good book, good stories, engaging characters but a few annoying tricks, 9 novembre 2013
Par 
Dan Merry "Dan Merry" (London) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(TOP 1000 COMMENTATEURS)   
Ce commentaire fait référence à cette édition : David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants (Broché)
Malcolm Galdwell does not need an introduction. He made his name by popularising various psychological concepts and by connecting them to everyday life situations. David and Goliath benefited from an impressive global marketing campaign but at least this is a good and engaging read. The style is very good and talks you thorough the argumentation of the author. The substance revolves around the argument saying that what appears to be strength is often a weakness. The entire book is then dedicated to the exploration through the ages, the fields and continents of this idea. I have enjoyed the book but my only criticism is that I have found it difficult at time. In a great effort to sink in his key point in the reader's mind, Gladwell indulges in a rather annoying fashion of repeating himself. I have read all his books and I have found David and Goliath to be its least powerful opus.

The book is structured as follows:
• Introduction
• 1 Vivek Ranadivé “It was really random. I mean, my father had never played basketball before.”
• 2 Teresa DeBrito “My largest class was twenty-nine kids. Oh, it was fun.”
• 3 Caroline Sacks “If I’d gone to the University of Maryland, I’d still be in science.”
• 4 David Boies “You wouldn’t wish dyslexia on your child. O would you? ”
• 5 Emil “Jay” Freireich “How Jay did it, I don’t know.”
• 6 Wyatt Walker “Der rabbit is de slickest o’ all de animals de lawd ever made”
• 7 Rosemary Lawlor “I wasn’t born that way. This was forced upon me.”
• 8 Wilma Derksend “We have all done something dreadful in our lives, or have felt the urge to.”
• 9 André Trocmé “We feel obliged to tell you that there are among us a certain number of Jews.”
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles 
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non


Du plus utile au moins utile | Du plus récent au plus ancien

Ce produit

David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits and the Art of Battling Giants
EUR 7,09
En stock
Ajouter au panier Ajouter à votre liste d'envies
Rechercher uniquement parmi les commentaires portant sur ce produit