Commentaires en ligne 


3 évaluations
5 étoiles:
 (2)
4 étoiles:
 (1)
3 étoiles:    (0)
2 étoiles:    (0)
1 étoiles:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Moyenne des commentaires client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients
Créer votre propre commentaire
 
 
Du plus utile au moins utile | Du plus récent au plus ancien

2 internautes sur 2 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 A hell of a good read, but a maddenly dumb battle, 1 février 2004
Although I agree in essence with the official commentaries above, at times the book became tedious with endless accounts of personal accounts of the fire-fight, with little attempt at characterisation in even minor depth. However I may be bewing a bit hard as this may be out of the scope of the genre of the book. This whole battle was one big massacre and Albany a set-piece ambush in any man's language. The book could have been called "How to survive a monumental stuff-up, and a good one" or "Victory on the Ia Drang".
As one who has served his country on Active Service, the overwhelming feeling I had was the sheer incompetence, bravado, self-confidence and arrogance of the senior staff who sent a relatively small number of soldiers, albeit with technology behind them, into the densley forested territory of a determined, well-trained foe (of fanatics) fighting for their homeland and whose numbers and strength were unknown. The reconnaissance was woeful. This happened in both LZ XRay and LZ Albany, the latter phase being an act of total stupidity for which the "fire-power" Americans were renowned in Vietnam. Had not their military commanders ever read The Art of War or von Clausewitz? The tactics of the Americans were innovative, but their strategy was sadly lacking, an observation also made by one of the Vietnamese senior officers interviewed in the book. Hence the real tragedy of the whole affair. The refuge of Cambodia made the war unwinnable, let alone the domestic political instability in Vietnam and the eventually war-weary people in the USA. For all the blood spilled and all the families scarred for life, it was all for nought for the Americans.
The authors talk frequently about Vietnamese "execution squads" killing wounded Americans on the battle field when policing the killing field but says nothing of what the Americans when doing the same, or for that matter what Australian troops did, especially when medical evacuation was not feasible. Perhaps this may have even been humane? Indeed there was no attempt by the Americans, even as a matter of field hygiene, to bury the enemy dead. Another fact missing is what happened to Vietnamese prisoners of war? The allies have always been particularly quiet on this in all the books I have read. I know many met a grizzly end. It also seemed that an Amercian life was worth far more than a Vietnamse one; perhaps a not so subtle racism? The account of American field practice made me cringe...even weapons uncleaned before a battle as well as smoking, singing and other practices as well as being ambushed while having a smoke with weapons not at the ready at all times. These I found very telling and did not seem to produce much reflection by the author.
The use of the word "fanatic" has always been used by one side to describe the other when soldiers of extraordinary tenacity fight beyond the limits of the other side (i.e the Japanese defenders of Iwo Jima). But isn't that what soldiers are ideally trained to do when there are no options. At no stage were the Americans who fought to the death called fanatics, and they were not defending home turf unlike the Vietnamese.
I found the most interesting aspect was the view of the enemy, as history is usually written by the victor (here the victor does not speak English). There was not a lot of sympathy for the millions of Vietnamese families who through a futile war lost loved ones and for the enemy survivors of the battles years later...only a brief paragraph at the end of the book.
There was little if any mention of the epidemic of post-traumatic stress disorder in the survivors on both sides. I felt this oversight was very telling.
I would love to read a book on the same topic from the other side before it is not too late. This is only happening now with German accounts of WW2 (i.e. von Kageneck). It is only by doing so, can we see the true intellectual tragedy of war which sucks not only the blood of nations into the blind black holes, but produces blinker vision for several generations....until the next war where both sides are allies and trading partners.
This is a fine book but has several deficiencies and blind spots that have still not be noticed so many years after the event.
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles 
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non


4 internautes sur 5 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Les premiers engagements militaires américains au Vietnam, 10 octobre 2009
Par 
Latour07 (Paris, France) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(#1 CRITIQUE au Tableau d'HONNEUR)    (TOP 500 COMMENTATEURS)    (TESTEURS)   
Ce commentaire fait référence à cette édition : We Were Soldiers Once...and Young: Ia Drang - the Battle That Changed the War in Vietnam (Poche)
Le 14 novembre 1965, le 1er Bataillon du célèbre 7° de cavalerie, commandée par le lieutenant-colonel Moore et accompagnée par le journaliste Galloway, est héliporté dans la Vallée de Ia Drang, un coin perdu du Vietnam. Ce bataillon se trouve immédiatement encerclé par une force supérieure en nombre de Viet Congs.

Moore et Galloway ici offrent un compte rendu détaillé, basé sur des entretiens avec les participants et sur leurs propres souvenirs, de ce qui s'est passé pendant la bataille de quatre jours. Beaucoup plus que d'une étude de bataille conventionnelle, le livre est un compte rendu honnête de la réaction émotionnelle du soldat à la terreur et l'horreur de cette rencontre violente et sanglante. Les deux camps ont revendiqué la victoire, les Etats-Unis appelant à une validation de la doctrine de la guerre aéroportée nouvellement développée (inspirée des techniques du colonel français Bigeard pendant la guerre d'Algérie).

Complétées par des cartes, cet ouvrage retrace la première bataille majeure au sol de la guerre du Vietnam.

Une bien belle épopée, qui fut mise en film, avec brio, par Mel Gibson, interprétant le lieutenant-colonel Moore dans "We Were Soldiers". Le livre est poignant. A lire.

NB : livre écrit dans la langue natale de l'auteur, en anglais
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles 
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non


2 internautes sur 5 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Epopée, 3 août 2005
Par 
Latour07 (Paris, France) - Voir tous mes commentaires
(#1 CRITIQUE au Tableau d'HONNEUR)    (TOP 500 COMMENTATEURS)    (TESTEURS)   
Ce commentaire fait référence à cette édition : We Were Soldiers Once...and Young: Ia Drang - the Battle That Changed the War in Vietnam (Poche)
Une bien belle épopée, qui fut mise en film, avec brio, par Mel Gibson. Le livre est poignant. A lire.
Aidez d'autres clients à trouver les commentaires les plus utiles 
Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non


Du plus utile au moins utile | Du plus récent au plus ancien

Ce produit

We Were Soldiers Once...and Young: Ia Drang - the Battle That Changed the War in Vietnam
EUR 6,36
En stock
Ajouter au panier Ajouter à votre liste d'envies
Rechercher uniquement parmi les commentaires portant sur ce produit