• Tous les prix incluent la TVA.
Il ne reste plus que 2 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon. Emballage cadeau disponible.
Quantité :1
The Carthaginians 6th-2nd... a été ajouté à votre Panier
+ EUR 2,99 (livraison)
D'occasion: Comme neuf | Détails
État: D'occasion: Comme neuf
Commentaire: SHIPS FROM USA - PLEASE ALLOW 10 to 21 BUSINESS DAYS FOR DELIVERY. LIKE NEW/UNREAD!!! Text is Clean and Unmarked! Has a small black line on the bottom/exterior edge of pages. Tracking is not available for orders shipped outside of the United States.
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir les 2 images

The Carthaginians 6th-2nd Century BC (Anglais) Broché – 22 avril 2014

3.0 étoiles sur 5 2 commentaires client

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
Broché
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 17,59
EUR 7,88 EUR 7,95
Note: Cet article est éligible à la livraison en points de collecte. Détails
Récupérer votre colis où vous voulez quand vous voulez.
  • Choisissez parmi 17 000 points de collecte en France
  • Les membres du programme Amazon Premium bénéficient de livraison gratuites illimitées
Comment commander vers un point de collecte ?
  1. Trouvez votre point de collecte et ajoutez-le à votre carnet d’adresses
  2. Sélectionnez cette adresse lors de votre commande
Plus d’informations
click to open popover

Offres spéciales et liens associés


Produits fréquemment achetés ensemble

  • The Carthaginians 6th-2nd Century BC
  • +
  • Carthaginian Warrior 264-146 BC
Prix total: EUR 35,26
Acheter les articles sélectionnés ensemble

Descriptions du produit

Présentation de l'éditeur

Carthage became Rome's greatest and most legendary enemy under the generalship of Hannibal in battles like Cannae. During the Punic Wars, Carthage's elite mercenary-professional army was ultimately defeated by Roman endurance and Scipio's genius.

Carthage, the port-city in Tunisia first settled by Phoenicians from Tyre, grew to extend a competitive maritime trading empire all over the Western Mediterranean and beyond, increasingly defended by the best navy of the period. In the 6th century BC this came into confrontation with Greek colonists in Sicily, starting major wars that lasted through the 5th and 4th centuries, and involved much interaction with different Greek forces. During the 3rd century Carthage first clashed with Roman armies, and in the course of three wars that raged over Spain, Sicily and Italy the Romans suffered the greatest defeats in their early history (e.g. Lake Trasimene and Cannae, 217 and 216 BC) at the hands of Hamilcar, Hannibal and Hasdrubal Barca, leading multinational armies of North Africans and Europeans.

It was 202 BC before Hannibal was decisively defeated by Scipio Africanus at Zama, and 146 BC before Carthage itself was finally captured and destroyed. The victors tried to wipe the memory of Carthage out of the historical record, and while Hannibal himself has attracted fascinated study, little work has been done on trying to explain the character and reconstruct the appearance of Carthaginian armies. The authors of this study present a careful synthesis of all available literary, archaeological and iconographic evidence, in the most up-to-date attempt to do so. Their findings are dramatized in a portfolio of detailed and animated color plates by Giuseppe Rava.

Biographie de l'auteur

Dr RAFFAELE D'AMATO is an experienced Turin-based researcher of the ancient and medieval military worlds. After achieving his first PhD in Romano-Byzantine Law, and having collaborated with the University of Athens, he gained a second doctorate in Roman military archaeology. He currently works as vice-head of the Laboratory of the Danubian Provinces at the University of Ferrara, under Professor Livio Zerbini.

Born in 1962, Andrea Salimbeti has had a life-long interest in ancient military history, in particular the Bronze Age in Greece and the Middle East. He served as a paratrooper in the Italian Army in Beirut and attended the Space Academy and flight training in USA. He now works for the space programme, and is also author of various articles on aerospace technology and flight equipment. His hobbies include modelling military figurines. The author lives in Frossasco, Italy.

Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.




Détails sur le produit


Quels sont les autres articles que les clients achètent après avoir regardé cet article?

Commentaires en ligne

3.0 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
0
4 étoiles
0
3 étoiles
2
2 étoiles
0
1 étoile
0
Voir les deux commentaires client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients

Meilleurs commentaires des clients

Format: Broché Achat vérifié
On ne présente plus Osprey et ceux qui sont sur le net connaissent parfaitement le site d'Andrea Salimbeti.
Ceci étant dit, toutes les conclusions de cet opuscule ne sont pas à prendre les yeux fermés mais cette collection a toujours offert une grande diversité de talents d'auteur...
Remarque sur ce commentaire Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus
Par Semper Victor COMMENTATEUR DU HALL D'HONNEURTOP 10 COMMENTATEURS le 1 juillet 2014
Format: Broché
« The Carthaginians, 6th-2nd Century BC présente », d'Andrea Salimbeti et Raffaele d'Amato est un petit volume de 64 pages seulement (Elite n°201) qui fait le point sans grande originalité sur l’armement, les tactiques et l’organisation des armées carthaginoises, sur une longue période de 5 siècles.

Il n'échappe à l'habituel formatage des publications Osprey de ce type que grâce à 8 merveilleuses illustrations en pleine page du talentueux Giuseppe Rava.
Remarque sur ce commentaire Une personne a trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: HASH(0x8ab3e3cc) étoiles sur 5 14 commentaires
14 internautes sur 14 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x8ab5f5a0) étoiles sur 5 Good overview, despite some glitches... 22 avril 2014
Par JPS - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché
Review first posted on Amazon.co.uk on 17 April 2014

This is a mostly good overview of "the Carthaginians" or, more accurately, of their armies from the 6th to the 2sd century BC, despite some "glitches", which are mostly approximations or simplifications, rather than mistakes. One feature which is quite striking at the outset when looking at the select bibliography is that the authors and the artist have cast a rather wide net. They have listed some 34 "modern works" or secondary sources in English, French, Spanish, German and Italian.

To me at least, it is fairly obvious that they have also researched their topic in depth.
Second, the authors are careful to define quite precisely the scope of their book in their introduction. The purpose is to try "to represent how Carthaginian warriors might have looked, according to the current state of our knowledge based on a comparative synthesis of the main archaeological finds and the iconographic and literary sources." This is what the book achieves, rather well in my view, and this is what the references included in the bibliography mentioned above reflect.

This is where a (mild) criticism may be in order with regards to the bibliography because it contains very few references for further reading for anyone which may have a wider interest than what the "Carthaginian warriors" - which, as the book shows quite clearly were mostly non-Carthaginian mercenaries. In particular, I was expecting to find at least Richard Miles' major book on Carthage ("Carthage must be destroyed", 2010) which, with its 34 pages of bibliography, would by itself have been enough to satisfy even the most dedicated "fan" of Carthage. Besides, since the scope of Miles' book covers the whole of Carthage's history from foundation to destruction, it would have been a rather nice fit with and complement to this one.

In practice, however, the book goes well beyond "how Carthaginian warriors might have looked". As most other Elite Osprey titles, it also provides sections on the historical background, the historical reputation of the Carthaginians, a chronology, organisation, tactics, arms and equipment, clothing and physical appearance, a section on the navy and a few selected campaigns and battles thrown in to illustrate.

To start with the last item, it should be notes that the authors and artist have taken the trouble to select less well-known battles and come up with the associated narratives and plates. So you get (rather superb) plates on the (naval) battle of Mylae (260 BC, during the First Punic War), on the little-known "Mercenary Revolt" (240-237 BC, and which in fact involved more than the mercenaries fighting against their former employer which had literally "short-changed" them) and the battle of Trasimene (217 BC, rather than much less original scenes of the battles of Cannae or even of Zama). More precisely, the latter plate depicts the last moments of Consul Gaius Flaminius Nepos, shortly before he was killed by a Celtic/Gallic chieftain. This plate, which happens to be the one selected for the cover of the book, is probably my favourite, with the aspects of the three main characters being derived and closely following the written and archaeological sources. One little quibble perhaps is the rather exaggerated form of the helmet worn by the Celt. Such helmets have indeed been found in graves, but whether they were actually worn in battle as opposed to being only ceremonial is debatable, if only because they could have been rather impractical.

The introduction, which provides much of the historical background, is quite remarkable, because it manages to present a rather good overview of the whole period in only four pages, including the Three Punic Wars, while making all of the main points (or, more modestly and accurately, all the ones that I could think of!). There was only one point that I was a bit doubtful about and that was when the authors listed Tarento alongside Alexandria as "one of the main centres of the Hellenic (or Hellenistic?) World. I would have expected to find Syracuse listed instead of Tarento.

The next section is an annotated and detailed chronology. It largely makes up for the brief historical introduction and manages to include a lot of information in as little space as possible. Since space is a rare commodity for Osprey authors, this is something of an achievement. However, I have two "quibbles" with the text included in the chronology, because, in their efforts to be both concise and as informative as possible, there are perhaps two areas where the authors have somewhat over-simplified.

One is a statement mentioning that Pyrrhus of Epirus, when fighting against them in Sicily, was "unable to defeat Carthaginians". While not incorrect, the statement is somewhat imprecise and could, for instance, lead the unformed reader to believe that one or several indecisive pitched battles were fought, with no clear winner. In fact, the Carthaginians were wise enough to avoid any battles against Pyrrhus and may anyway not have had sufficient troops in Sicily to offer such a battle. Accordingly, the King was forced to besiege and take the Carthaginian fortresses one by one. This is what he did, although it was both time and resources consuming, and the King only had a limited supply of both. If I remember correctly, he took all but one of them, before being forced to return to South Italy and face the Romans once again in battle. Accordingly, the statement is factually correct, even if potentially misleading, because Pyrrhus was both unable to bring the Carthaginians to battle in order to defeat them in the field and he was unable to take all of their strongpoints so that they were able to make yet another "comeback" as soon as he had to leave.

The second imprecision is about the numbers in Hannibal's army as he set out from Spain to invade Italy. The authors mention 50000 foot and 9000 horse. Other references mention up to 90000 foot and up to 12000 cavalry. In addition to having used different sources, the differences in numbers can be reconciled through three different factors. The lower numbers may correspond to those that Hannibal set off with, while the higher ones would be the total for all Carthaginian forces in Spain before his departure. Moreover, the differences can also be explained at least in part if one considers that the two sets of numbers may not be determined in the same way at the same moment. For instance, the lower number may only include warriors and soldiers whereas the higher one could also include squires, camp followers etc... Also, the lower number may reflect the size of the force that crossed the Ebro whereas the higher one could reflect the army swelled by the various and numerous Gallic contingents that had joined on the way as the army was just about to cross the Alps. Needless to say, the authors were not going to engage in this kind of discussion because of the space constraints that they were subject to and considering that this issue was of secondary importance given the scope of this book.

The section dealing with the Carthaginian armies' organisation is a bit of a misnomer because it addresses, in fact, it addresses its multi-ethnic composition and examines the main contingents in sequence, just like the older Osprey title on the Punic Wars by Terence Wise does (and at times using the same wording...). Again, this is a fact, but perhaps also a criticism, although the authors do take the trouble to mention what little is known of army organisations every time they get a chance to do so.

There is, however, a bit of a problem in the section on tactics. This is because the authors are rather unclear as to what exactly is meant when using the term "phalanx" to describe the close-order formation of Carthaginian infantry. While they do mention hoplite-style formations, and the Carthaginians clearly started the period with these, references about pikes having to be held with both hands leads the reader into believing that Hannibal may have used a Macedonian-style phalanx or even a force on infantry armed partly with long thrusting spears and partly with pikes. This ambiguity echoes debates among historians on this issue, with some wanting to see the Carthaginians, and their Greek mercenaries equipped with pikes although there is little evidence to support this.

There is simply nothing else to do than to applaud the sections on arms and equipment and clothing and physical appearance, with these being the best, the core of the book and perhaps its most valuable component (together with the plates). There are at least two reasons for this in my view. One is that the authors are careful to be specific and introduce up-to-date findings that can be particularly interesting. One example is the discovery of Gallic swords of uneven quality (and different composition) in various sites. This goes some way towards explaining the apparent contradiction between the high reputation of Gallic smiths in Antiquity and the statements of Polybius about Gallic swords bending after a couple of blows and having to be straightened out in the middle of a battle.

Finally, there are a couple of rather "technical" glitches in the section on the Carthaginian navy. One is the statement that the Carthaginian invented both the "fours" (quadriremes or tetreres) and the "fives" (quinqueremes or penteres and NOT penteconteres, which were the older 50-oars warships that had been prevalent up to the 6th century BC). While modern authors (and the Ancient sources) do credit them with the invention of the quadriremes, it seems to have been the naval engineers of Dyonisus of Syracuse which came up with the first designs of a quinquereme which is first attested in the sources in about 390 BC. Having mentioned this, both rivals quickly adopted and improved upon the designs of their rival in what was one of Antiquity's most notable "arms' race". The second "glitch" is a drawing on page 49 which shows a quinquereme with a single bank of rowers and five rowers for each row. Instead, and since "fives" were a development of the trireme, they seem to have had three banks of oars, with two rowers for two of the banks and a single rower for the third. Those interested in the technical reasons for this can look it up in either "The Age of the Galley" (editor Robert Gardiner) or, even more recent, William Murray's "The Age of the Titans" by William Murray which is especially about "big ships" ("fours", "fives" and above) and contains a detailed annex for each of these two types of warships.

To conclude this over-long review, and contrary to the assessment of another reviewer on the UK site, this is, despite a number of mostly minor "glitches" a mostly good and valuable title which I would rate four stars.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x8ab5f5f4) étoiles sur 5 Ugly pictures 5 mars 2015
Par Patrick L. Boyle - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
This I'm afraid is a very poor book. It is indeed a picture book. But the pictures are not very good. The bio of the artist tells us that he was self taught. Next time I want a an artist who actually went to art school. This guy is a very second (third?) rate painter.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x8ab5f8d0) étoiles sur 5 Excellent history of the Carthaginian army 26 mai 2014
Par Alex Casillas - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
I chose this rating of "5 stars" because the book
added greatly to my understanding of Carthaginian warfare and military history, though I had substantial knowledge of the subject.
I was surprised how much I didn't know and also how it uses archaeological finds to support or refute claims made by early history or recently produced histories in regards to the culture of the ancient Carthaginians I thoroughly found enlightening.
It was very interesting.
This is worthwhile reading for anyone who has an interest in ancient Carthage, the Roman Republic or interest in the ancient history of the Western Mediteranean.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x8ab5f7c8) étoiles sur 5 The warriors that fought for Carthage 7 novembre 2014
Par Anibal Madeira - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
The authors Salimbeti and D'Amato are regular appearances on Osprey titles, and they always manage to bring scholarship, interesting artifacts and images of monuments and paintings which enlighten and justify the text and their hypothesis. All clearly explained for the layman and accompanied by the impressive art of Giuseppe Rava.

In the hundreds of books published by Osprey there were too few about Carthage, and the most recent one in the warrior series, although very interesting and with gorgeous plates, was almost entirely dedicated to the mercenary in the ancient world (not specifically the ones hired by Carthage). The authors of this work didn't fell into that trap; they managed to bring as much information on the Punic soldier and the evolution of their equipment and tactics as it can possibly be ascertained from the sources. Naturally they also mention the mercenaries and their equipment; it would be a severe mistake not to do it because they were an extremely important part of the Carthaginian army.

It includes a resume of the Carthaginian Military history, a competent chronology, a small discussion regarding Carthaginian cruelty, the organization of the army, including allies and mercenaries, tactics, troop types (including the old chariots, elephants, cavalry and artillery, etc.), Arms and equipment, dress and physical appearance, the Carthaginian Navy and some selected battles and campaigns (the conquest of Sardinia 545-509 BC; the battle of Himera 480 BC; the Mercenary revolt).

Terracotta statuettes, weapons and armour, the monument at Chemtou and votive steles from the Tophet of Carthage are shown with details which helped in the remarkable colour plates by Rava which include: Early Carthaginians 6th cent. BC (representing a Carthaginian war-chariot, its crew and Iolei warriors); First Battle of Himera 480 BC (with Hamilcar Magonid, a Sardinian Phoenician marine and a Carthaginian Hoplite equipped in the Greek way); High Ranking Officials c. 400 BC (A shophet, a Priest and a General performing a ceremony); The Mercenary Revolt 238 BC (excellent action scene representing a war elephant, a Gaetulian cavalryman, an Iberian Cavalryman and a Balearic slinger); Life in the City, mid 4th Cent. BC (including 2 well equipped Carthaginian citizen soldiers and a Greek mercenary watching women dancing and playing music); Battle of Lake Trasimeno 217 BC (this fabulous painting represents the last moments of the Roman Consul Caius Flaminius Nepos; also represented in this piece is a Roman triarius, a Garamantian light infantryman and an Insubrian Chieftain); Battle of Mylae 260 bc (a naval engagement, in this plate a Roman boarding party uses the corvus to attack Carthaginian marines); Hannibal Barca before Zama 202 BC (magnificent representation of Hannibal, his shield bearer, a Puno-Lybian Doryphoros, an Adyrmachid warrior and a Carthaginian citizen cavalry standard bearer).
0 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x8ab5f9b4) étoiles sur 5 Worthy Treatment of Rome's Worthy Foe 12 février 2015
Par Doug Welch - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché
Of the Osprey titles on the Carthaginans, this one has the widest scope, covering the entire run of the Carthaginian empire and its armies. Carthage was primarily an empire of trade between Punic trading posts and other markets. As such, its ruling oligarchy was more geared toward business than warfare and to field the armies needed to take on city-states, Carthage utilized mercenaries and allies who were under the command of native Carthaginians. The Carthaginian army in the field was disparate and composed of multiethnic and multinational units consisting of such widely varied troop types as Baelaric slingers, Libyan and African mercenaries, Numidian light cavalry, Spanish light infantry and Celtic heavy infantry. Despite a background in the Bronze Age Phoenician trade empire, the Carthaginians adapted easily to the modes of warfare of their enemies such as the Greek city-states of Magna Graecia (Sicily and southern Italy) and later the Roman style of war. Salimbetti and D'Amato cover a lot of ground in this slim volume: Organization of the Carthaginian Army; its tactics and warfighting style; the weapons and armor of the Carthaginian army and a few descriptions of battles which are not already covered in Osprey's books on the Punic Wars. Also: Carthage's revolt of its own mercenary army is an instructive lesson for world powers seeking to outsource military capabilities. This book also benefits from more recent archeological discoveries and recent scholarship about the Carthaginian culture, including the most recent scholarly thinking on Roman accusations of child sacrifice and temple prostitution.
I'm not the biggest fan of illustrator Giuseppe Rava's work, he needs to work on anatomy, perspective and composition (he's no Angus McBride or Peter Dennis, but who is?) and the color selections can be garish and not respectful of atmospheric perspective or the ability for the viewer to distinguish between primary and secondary matters in the illustrations, but he does include a lot of colorful and interesting stuff that is the result of newer research and illustration F (on the cover for this edition) brings up a lot of these issues but also addresses a few of them.
His few illustrations of Carthaginians not engaged in war are also really enlightening on this long "deleted" Semitic and African culture, eradicated by Rome in its climb to Mediterranean hegemony.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique


Commentaires

Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?