Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.

Prix Kindle : EUR 7,37
TVA incluse

Ces promotions seront appliquées à cet article :

Certaines promotions sont cumulables avec d'autres offres promotionnelles, d'autres non. Pour en savoir plus, veuillez vous référer aux conditions générales de ces promotions.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Conspiracies: The Facts. The Theories. The Evidence par [Thomas, Andy]
Publicité sur l'appli Kindle

Conspiracies: The Facts. The Theories. The Evidence Format Kindle

Voir les 3 formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
Format Kindle, 1 janvier 2013
EUR 7,37

Longueur : 292 pages Word Wise: Activé Composition améliorée: Activé
Page Flip: Activé Langue : Anglais

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

'Whether steeped in conspiracy lore or just a novice, you'll get a better handle on what's really going on in the world by reading Andy Thomas' Conspiracies.' --Nexus Magazine

'... Reasoned, objective and most importantly fair.... a valuable addition to the existing canon of literature in this most fractious of subjects: fascinating, sometimes worrying and highly recommended.' --Phenomena Magazine

'... Reasoned, objective and most importantly fair.... a valuable addition to the existing canon of literature in this most fractious of subjects: fascinating, sometimes worrying and highly recommended.' --Phenomena Magazine

Présentation de l'éditeur

... Reasoned, objective and most importantly fair.... a valuable addition to the existing canon of literature in this most fractious of subjects: fascinating, sometimes worrying and highly recommended.' - Phenomena Magazine

'Whether steeped in conspiracy lore or just a novice, you'll get a better handle on what's really going on in the world by reading Andy Thomas's Conspiracies.' - Nexus Magazine

In today's environment, with trust in governments at an all-time low, conspiracy theories have found a new currency, and websites and social networking ensure they receive a wider and more rapid spread than ever before. But how do we separate truth from imagination? Was Princess Diana murdered, as many people think, despite all the official denials? Did NASA really go to the Moon, when anomalies in the photographic record suggest otherwise? Could 9/11 really have been set up by agencies within the USA itself? The author opens the conspiracy casebook by examining the mindset of those who believe in conspiracies, and considers whether the dismissive attitude towards them has been fair.

Part Two looks into history to establish that when conspiracies do occur, credibility should therefore be given to belief in some of the alleged plots and cover-ups of today. This leads into a well-argued examination of some of the most popular conspiracies of our times, including theories over assassinations, UFO cover-ups, and widely voiced concerns over 9/11 and the 'New World Order'.

Part Three draws the conclusion that while not all conspiracy theories can be proven, they do at least draw attention to paths not to take, and can be valuable in helping to create a better world where new trust and hope can be forged. Are we living in a world of control, of oppression, of habitual deception? Is this really how things are, or simply human nature massively distorted through a dark lens? The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 710 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 304 pages
  • Editeur : Watkins Publishing (1 janvier 2013)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ASIN: B00C25C5DG
  • Synthèse vocale : Activée
  • X-Ray :
  • Word Wise: Activé
  • Lecteur d’écran : Pris en charge
  • Composition améliorée: Activé
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : Soyez la première personne à écrire un commentaire sur cet article
  • Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon: n°232.674 dans la Boutique Kindle (Voir le Top 100 dans la Boutique Kindle)
  • Voulez-vous nous parler de prix plus bas?
    Si vous vendez ce produit, souhaitez-vous suggérer des mises à jour par l'intermédiaire du support vendeur ?

click to open popover

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) 3.8 étoiles sur 5 4 commentaires
2 internautes sur 2 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Great Introduction to Conspiracy Research 15 octobre 2016
Par Freeborn - Publié sur
Format: Broché
Normally, I’m no fan of conspiracy anthologies. They are often replete with disinformation fed into the mainstream by the official sources they purport to challenge. However, this is not the case with Conspiracies which offers beginners a first rate introduction to conspiracy research.

I ordered this book after watching Andy Thomas’s Open Minds Conference lecture. The writer has done the truth a great service by finally laying to rest the preposterous idea that anyone who questions official accounts of events like the JFK assassination 911, 7/7 is a paranoid with "a tin-foil hat". As Thomas points out, conspiracy theory has been with us for thousands of years. Whenever governments have produced indecently threadbare accounts of events, conspiracy theories have blossomed in profusion. The irresistible conclusion to draw from Thomas's work is that, notwithstanding mainstream academia and media attempts to denigrate it, the conspiracy epistemology ( or "mindset" as he calls it ) is now the only rational response available to any thinking person.

If, as Thomas suggests, we live in a world where we are “routinely denied the truth and obfuscation and corruption are endemic at every level” - then not to look beyond the mainstream for answers is less a pathology or "tin-foil hat" paranoia than a laudable human reaction to current circumstances. In fact, I think Thomas is right to suggest, as he does at the end of the book, that using the plethora of information now available to discover the truth that is denied to us by government, is, at this acute point in history when false-flag attacks and propaganda may be used yet again to spark another world war, actually a public duty.

Thomas helpfully groups into chapters the main areas where government disinformation and falsehood have been used to deceive the public. Historical, false-flag, political, assassination, ET, NWO conspiracies are all covered. Thomas clearly demonstrates how monstrous lies have been told by governments intent on starting resource-grabbing, geo-politically strategic wars-the Gulf of Tonkin incident used by LBJ to escalate the war in Vietnam was wholly fake, for example. It's, therefore, a shame that the book predates the current NATO intervention in Syria where the Western media barrage of propaganda being directed against the legitimate government in Damascus has been relentless. Notwithstanding this monumental disinformation campaign, the fact that ISIS is a NATO-sponsored terror outfit bearing uncanny resemblance to Islamic fundamentalist militias used previously by the West in Serbia, Iraq, Libya and Egypt is becoming increasingly transparent.

While Thomas's account is one of the best anthologies of conspiracy theory to date, I did find a couple of oddities. The praise heaped on Norman Baker MP for his "brave" expose of the Dr. Kelly murder conspiracy neglects mention of the fact that Baker's conclusion was that Iraqi intelligence was responsible for the biological weapons specialist's death. In such an account, Blair's government is wholly absolved of all guilt. Likewise, the praise for the work of physicist, Steven E Jones, in proposing the likelihood that the Twin Towers were demolished with explosives obscures the fact that Jones had himself been involved in highly secret U.S. government cold fusion technology prior to his 911 research. He therefore may well have had a vested interest in promoting the demolition theory to disguise the probability that energy-directed weaponry is the far more likely cause - as Dr Judy Wood has demonstrated - of the "dustification" of the Twin Towers.

Perhaps, Thomas could have spent more time on the extent to which governments are now pumping out fake conspiracy theory in order to discredit researchers who are on to something. The origin of David Icke's infamous reptilian ideas appears to have been two highly-placed CIA agents who sought him out. It was a scam that reinforced the "tin-foil hat" image that has followed Icke ever since! The episode, however, is instructive in demonstrating the extent to which governments now see conspiracy theorists as the main enemy and obstacle to their plans for engineered depression and perpetual war. It’s an information war in which the military intelligence elites who first sponsored the internet as a means to spy on us are now desperately fighting a rearguard action against the free traffic of ideas that challenges their mass media monopoly of official "truth".
2 internautes sur 2 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Informative, Interesting, well-researched. 4 mars 2014
Par Richard Fredericks - Publié sur
Format: Broché
I've devoted two decades of professional work to the issues Thomas discusses, and while the book was somewhat introductory (as in, covered a lot of territory in short order), it was still very informative and very compelling. Thomas takes an even-handed approach, and unpacks many of the more mainstream arguments as well. I'm not altogether sure what beef the previous reviewer has, to give the book 3 of 5 based solely on Thomas' relatively brief summary of the Kennedy case (as interesting as this reviewer's take is), given that this book is not another JFK book. Mainly, Thomas lays out a solid case as to why the conspiracy or alternative approach to history carries more explanatory power than does the incidental/accidental view. The book is well-done and well worth a read.
1 internautes sur 7 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 the biggest conspiracy has an answer, WHY don't you show it? 26 février 2014
Par Patricia H. - Publié sur
Format: Format Kindle
There is a way to PROVE that the biggest conspiracy "theory" in history is a lie, in other words, there is a way to prove it really was a powerful conspiracy that killed JFK.

The way that is proved is rather simple. There are two ways to determine the timing of the shots that killed JFK. If the time between shots is the same, that PROVES statistically that a conspiracy killed JFK. The way the obvious has been hidden from Americans is that anything that conflicts with the lone gunman fired three shots scenario is viciously attacked as untrue, hence it is a "conspiracy theory." Once they con you into saying conspiracy theory, they own you.

For example, find one person who witnessed JFK's head wounds at Parkland Hospital who says that JFK's head wound was anything like what you see in the Zapruder film. You can't find anybody who said that. WHY? Because JFK had a massive exit wound in the right rear of his head and the US government forded evidence and lied to hide the truth. This information in this paragraph does not prove anything, nor does this doctor who describes JFK's head wounds but it is a HINT that the US government lied.


To PROVE that a powerful conspiracy killed JFK, we do the following:

Looking at the Zparuder fillm, the first time we can DEFINITELY say a shot was fired (when we see a reaction to a shot) is Zapruder frame 224. That is the point that Gov. Connally raises his arms and begins turning as he said he did when he heard the first shot fired.

The next time we can definitely say a shot was fired was frame 313, the point when President Kennedy was shot in the head.

The FBI measured the film speed of Zapruder's camera as 18.3 frames per second.

Computing the time between those TWO SHOTS is easily done:

Time = (313 - 224)/18.3 = approx 4.8 seconds.

The second way to time the shots was done by audio experts who used an audio recording made during the shooting. Virtually every JFK "researcher" on the planet Earth believes the audio evidence is questionable but look at this figure:

As you can easily see, the time between shots #3 and #4 is also 4.8 seconds. I have been told by MANY FOOLS that is a coincidence, it means nothing. To say that, you are arguing that audio experts looked at random noise and picked 4.8 seconds as the time between shots #3 and #4. What are the odd that both have the same time between two of the shots and the audio evidence is not valid?

Next point: There are MANY, MANY witnesses who say the last two shots were BANG-BANG, two shots fired a split second apart. Before we leave the audio evidence, notice that it also shows that the last two shots were fired 0.7 seconds apart. As you surely know, shot #4 per the audio evidence was fired from the right front, shot #5 was fired from behind (audio evidence shot #5 was the third and final shot fired from the TSBD where Oswald allegedly was located. Anybody who has ever looked at the Z film thinks the shot that hit JFK in the head was fired from the right front, it's not until the idiotic story of that shot coming from behind do people back down and surrender to the US governments BS story of a lone gunman. As you look at this short GIF, it sure looks like JFK was shot in the head from the right front and that Gov Connally was shot in the back from a shot fired from behind a split second later:

John Connally said for decades in MANY interviews:

1. The force of the bullet (to his back) bent him over:
2. He turned to his right after hearing the first shot and as he was facing forward while turning back toward his left he felt the shot to his back
3. Nellie said that John C turned to his right then back to his left and THEN he was shot in the back.

You can clearly see in any Zapruder film version that John Connally is not bent over (knocked forward) until a split second AFTER JFK was shot in the head. You can easily see John Connally bent over in the new digitally stabilized Zapruder versions but it is not so easy with the originally films that were released. The US government (under the cover of Life Magazine buying the Z film) hid the film from Americans until 1975 when it was first shown on TV. The conspirators never wanted Americans to see what obviously shows the biggest lie in history to be "suspect."

But not to worry. People let the press tell them what to think and they tend to give the US government's version a pass when it is obviously a lie. The audio evidence and the Zapruder film taken together prove that we have been lied to. The odds of the echo patterns looking like shots AND that three of them were separated by 4.8 and 0.7 seconds proves that a conspiracy killed JFK. IF you continue to add in constraints to the equation it quickly passes a BILLION to one that JFK was killed by a conspiracy.

But this won't make sense to you until you understand why the 1978 HSCA said there were four shots and the figure shows FIVE shots. WHY the DIFFERENCE? You have to understand how the mistakes and the lies mix together to hide the truth. I have a simple video which shows some of the witnesses saying BANG-BANG for the last two shots (there are many more but the US editors go out of their way to ignore BANG-BANG, those were echoes, right?). The audio evidence PROVES they weren't echoes.


If you are in a hurry, start watching at 6 minutes or so. There is absolutely no doubt that the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG. Watch Gov. Connally turn after the sign (Z224). How did he turn if he was shot n the back at Z224? The fact is he wasn't seriously wounded while he turned, he was wounded in the back 0.7 seconds AFTER JFK was shot in the head.

If you have doubts or question, my book "0.7 Seconds to Conspiracy" explains many of the conflicts in the JFK assassination. The US government told any lie, forged all the evidence they could to hide when Connally was shot in the back. That is one of the biggest secrets the US government has ever locked away.

Once you realize the US government made fools of us all, I bet it changes many things you say in your book because if you can lie for decades about JFK's murder, the other lies they have told are child's play by comparison. You can not understand US history since 1963 until you understand the scam called the JFK assassination. I also recommend you read again the children's story "The Emperor's New Clothes." It will explain the psychology of the big lie.

My YOUTUBE channel, SCGATOR2001 had almost one million views and YOUTUBE has shut it down. They have succumbed to pressure by others to hide this information from Americans. One of the biggest stories in history has an answer, the US government lied and cheated and those who bought it hook, line and sinker are fighting to keep the truth buried. Some can't accept that they have been made fools of. I can prove they were and they don't like it. I will be adding more videos as I am remaking those that were removed off of YOUTUBE. Now I can say that YOUTUBE has joined the censors who are desperate to keep the truth hidden.

I did find your book interesting but you need to factor in the JFK assassination solution AFTER you verify that everything I showed you is true.

Bill Charleston

JFKLIES on FACEBOOK will have the links to future videos.
0 internautes sur 5 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 AMAZON, HELP! Someone else logged into my computer and I did NOT rearlize it until AFTER I submitted the review. 26 février 2014
Par William R. Charleston - Publié sur
Format: Format Kindle
I wrote a book review on a shared computer. It is under the name of that I did not realize I was logged into.

I signed the review BILL CHARLESTON, can you please send it to AND to so I can resubmit it!

Sorry, I did not realize Patty had logged into this sometimes shared computer

Bill Charleston
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous

Où en sont vos commandes ?

Livraison et retours

Besoin d'aide ?