Acheter d'occasion
EUR 3,12
+ EUR 2,99 (livraison en France métropolitaine)
D'occasion: Bon | Détails
Vendu par -betterworldbooks-
État: D'occasion: Bon
Commentaire: Le dos et les coins peuvent montrer des signes d'usure. Les pages peuvent inclure des notes et quelques signes de feutre. Sous garantie de remboursement complet. Plus de plus d'un million clients satisfaits! Votre alphabétisation dans le monde achat avantages!
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir les 2 images

Dracula (Anglais) Broché – 26 octobre 2013

3,4 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile
3,4 étoiles sur 5 10 commentaires client

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 3,12
click to open popover

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Descriptions du produit

Présentation de l'éditeur

During a business visit to Count Dracula's castle in Transylvania, a young English solicitor finds himself at the center of a series of horrifying incidents. Jonathan Harker is attacked by three phantom women, observes the Count's transformation from human to bat form, and discovers puncture wounds on his own neck that seem to have been made by teeth. Harker returns home upon his escape from Dracula's grim fortress, but a friend's strange malady — involving sleepwalking, inexplicable blood loss, and mysterious throat wounds — initiates a frantic vampire hunt. The popularity of Bram Stoker's 1897 horror romance is as deathless as any vampire. Its supernatural appeal has spawned a host of film and stage adaptations, and more than a century after its initial publication, it continues to hold readers spellbound.

Biographie de l'auteur

Abraham "Bram" Stoker (8 November 1847 – 20 April 1912) was an Irish novelist and short story writer, best known today for his 1897 Gothic novel Dracula. During his lifetime, he was better known as personal assistant of actor Henry Irving and business manager of the Lyceum Theatre in London, which Irving owned. Early life Stoker was born on 8 November 1847 at 15 Marino Crescent, Clontarf, on the northside of Dublin, Ireland. His parents were Abraham Stoker (1799–1876), from Dublin, and Charlotte Mathilda Blake Thornley (1818–1901), who was raised in County Sligo. Stoker was the third of seven children, the eldest of whom was Sir Thornley Stoker, 1st Bt. Abraham and Charlotte were members of the Church of Ireland Parish of Clontarf and attended the parish church with their children, who were baptised there. Stoker was bedridden with an unknown illness until he started school at the age of seven, when he made a complete recovery. Of this time, Stoker wrote, "I was naturally thoughtful, and the leisure of long illness gave opportunity for many thoughts which were fruitful according to their kind in later years." He was educated in a private school run by the Rev. William Woods. After his recovery, he grew up without further major health issues, even excelling as an athlete (he was named University Athlete) at Trinity College, Dublin, which he attended from 1864 to 1870. He graduated with honours as a B.A. in Mathematics. He was auditor of the College Historical Society ('the Hist') and president of the University Philosophical Society, where his first paper was on "Sensationalism in Fiction and Society". Early career Stoker became interested in the theatre while a student through a friend, Dr. Maunsell. He became the theatre critic for the Dublin Evening Mail, co-owned by the author of Gothic tales Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu. Theatre critics were held in low esteem, but he attracted notice by the quality of his reviews. In December 1876 he gave a favourable review of Henry Irving's Hamlet at the Theatre Royal in Dublin. Irving invited Stoker for dinner at the Shelbourne Hotel where he was staying. They became friends. Stoker also wrote stories, and in 1872 "The Crystal Cup" was published by the London Society, followed by "The Chain of Destiny" in four parts in The Shamrock. In 1876, while a civil servant in Dublin, Stoker wrote a non-fiction book (The Duties of Clerks of Petty Sessions in Ireland, published 1879), which remained a standard work.

Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.

Détails sur le produit

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) 3.4 étoiles sur 5 10 commentaires
2.0 étoiles sur 5 A Bad Advert for Create Space 11 janvier 2014
Par BillAdams - Publié sur
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
This is a print-on-demand book, obviously made from an electronic file, nothing wrong with that, but the quality is quite poor. The line spacing is weird and distracting, varying randomly from single to 1.5 to double. The cover is coated on too-light of paper, so it curls up like a wood shaving. The large page format is bizarre, since the font is ordinary 12 point. There are a few spelling errors, not too many, mostly homonyms that a spell-checker can't check. The advertised historical, critical, and biographical material is pure wikipedia, with no depth and no references. It is Dracula, and you can read it, but I've never had a book before whose physical design was so annoying.
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Did not expect a big book 27 juin 2014
Par JVG - Publié sur
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
I like the product very much and it shipped in decent time. The only thing it is an average size book, like a text book. I expected a small book to be able to carry around but nope. It is a big book
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Numbers?? 12 février 2014
Par Kathy Lundstrom - Publié sur
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
I like the book, but where are the page numbers?? I have never received a book before that did not have page numbers
on it.
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Stands the test of time despite shortcomings 12 octobre 2014
Par LF - Publié sur
Format: Broché
I thought this book might not stand the test of time and might be dated and boring. That's not the case. I enjoyed reading it. Granted, it isn't perfect, and it's more fun to point out the shortcomings than to praise the good things about it.

The women are ridiculous. They are not human. They are as two dimensional as I've seen anywhere. They are just there to "stand for" an idyllic sweetheart. They are perfect. They have no personality at all. They are mannequins.

The men aren't particularly differentiated either, except with a broad brush. This isn't a "great author". He's more of a great storyteller.

I like the fact that the climax, the big finish, the big showdown, is handled so quickly. There's only one second of confrontation, when the Count opens his eyes and gives that nasty look. That's all he has time to do. It's not like one of those stupid movies that drag out a car chase or something. The whole book is building to the clash between good and evil, and the clash itself is over in a second. Why do I like that? Because it shatters a cliche. Adventure movies drag the climax out, and horror movies don't even give you an ending because the monster is coming back in the sequel, and probably even coming back in the movie you're watching because you think he's dead but he's not, but here in Dracula the bad guy is done, his ticket is punched, thank you very much, have a nice drive home.

I think the biggest fault in the book is that the heroes are so inept at protecting the victims, the two poor angelic girls. It's comedic how the good guys leave them alone, allowing Dracula at them. Hey, stupid, Sweet Sue is going to get bitten by the vampire, you idiot, so stop ignoring her. We can see it coming a mile away. You're supposed to be so smart, Van Helsing. I wouldn't let you babysit. You'd be watching tv while the vampire sucked all the blood right out of the baby in the other room.

Still, I gave the book 5 stars. It's a very well told story that held my interest every step of the way. Renfield is a great supporting character. I guess behind Dracula, Renfield is the most interesting character in the book. He eats flies and spiders, and he's a terrific philosopher.

If I re-read the book some day I might find myself rooting for Dracula because the good guys are kind of insipid. But how often does the bad guy win? Very rarely. The bad guy won in Chinatown, but come on, how much of a chance did Sauron really have?
2.0 étoiles sur 5 Meh 25 mars 2014
Par Jack - Publié sur
Format: Broché
Bram Stokers Dracula started the entire mainstream concept of vampires in horror culture, but does it hold up in a modern society with saturated revolutionary horror writers like Lovecraft or King. Unfortunately Dracula’s strengths back then, are its weaknesses today. Something people don’t realize is that the original Dracula is a serial, or a weekly posting of letters in papers or on carriages. Once then inspiring strong female characters today look more akin to cardboard dated stereotypes. The biggest problem with Dracula, it has little description and character development, not to mention every character is flat. Either they are just lawful good, overly caring and shy, or a straight up a supernatural dingbat. This book has many useless characters. So many poor writing choices are found in this book. You know you have made mistakes when I would sooner consider the antagonist the hero. In fact Dracula is my favorite character because he is a carnal savage and a mannered gentleman, a then relevant joke on the aristocracy of Victorian age Europe. This I like, I like how Dracula has to make convoluted plans to succeed, I like how he appears as a cruel power, and I like how he works as a whole. But, if I am reading a book I want it to be one of these three things: Serious, relaxed, or bizarre. If you are trying to be scary then be serious. I can take the fact your book is about a giant space octopus-dragon-god-horror if you act serious about it, but when you are straight up goofy half the time, I won’t be impressed. This is what Dracula does wrong. Honestly this book might have been more suspenseful if you waited days to hear things about it, but as a whole it’s a bit spineless. This book is not bad, just not very good. But without it, horror would not be as it is today. This book has a strong ending though, ending with this “This was the Un-Dead home of the vampire king to whom so many more were due. Its emptiness spoke eloquent to make certain I knew what I was doing.”(Stoker 391). I recommend this to book to anyone that read in snippets, or who dislikes description.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique

Où en sont vos commandes ?

Livraison et retours

Besoin d'aide ?