Actuellement indisponible.
Nous ne savons pas quand cet article sera de nouveau approvisionné ni s'il le sera.

Vous l'avez déjà ? Vendez sur Amazon

Garmin Edge 510 - Compteur GPS connecté pour vélo

4.7 étoiles sur 5 3 commentaires client

Actuellement indisponible.
Nous ne savons pas quand cet article sera de nouveau approvisionné ni s'il le sera.
  • Ecran couleur tactile 2,2'' utilisable avec des gants
  • Fonction LiveTrack pour le suivi en temps réel de votre activité
  • Transfert de données vers un smartphone via Bluetooth® et l'application Garmin ConnectTM Mobile
  • Réception et envoi instantanés de parcours et d'entraînements vers Garmin Connect via Bluetooth
  • Altimètre barométrique et compatible ceinture cardio, capteurs de cadence et de puissance

Il existe un modèle plus récent pour cet article :


Nos prix incluent l'éco-participation sur tous les produits concernés. Vous voulez recycler votre appareil électrique ou électronique gratuitement? En savoir plus ici.
Pour toute information sur la rémunération copie privée, sur son paiement et son éventuel remboursement, veuillez consulter cette page.


Offres spéciales et liens associés


Récompenses

Cliquez sur une récompense pour voir une plus grande image
Image de la récompense

Informations sur le produit

Descriptif technique
CouleurNoir
TailleTU
Taille de l'écran2.2 pouces
Type d'affichageLCD (TFT)
Hauteur2 pouces
Longueur3.4 pouces
Poids350 grammes
Saisonprintemps-ete_14
Batterie(s) / Pile(s) incluse(s) Oui
MarqueGarmin
  
Informations complémentaires
Dimensions du produit8,6 x 2,3 x 5,1 cm ; 82 g
Piles :1 Lithium ion - incluse(s)
Numéro du modèle de l'article010-01064-00
ASINB00APBMNOK
Date de mise en ligne sur Amazon.fr1 février 2013
Moyenne des commentaires client 4.7 étoiles sur 5 3 commentaires client
Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon 182.559 en High-tech (Voir les 100 premiers)
N'est plus produit par le fabricantOui
  
Votre avis
Voulez-vous nous parler de prix plus bas?
 

Description du produit

Un modèle conçu spécialement pour votre entraînement
Le modèle Edge 510 permet aux cyclistes de visualiser leur trajet sur une carte et d'enregistrer des données détaillées avec une précision que seul le GPS peut fournir. Notre gamme de produits a continué d'évoluer pour vous offrir les fonctions dont vous rêvez et la qualité que vous et votre vélo méritez. L'écran tactile 2.2" (5.6 cm) est parfaitement lisible. Découvrez de nouvelles fonctions telles que Virtual Partner qui vous permettront de réaliser de nouvelles performances en affrontant un partenaire virtuel. Vos amis pourront également suivre vos progrès grâce à la technologie Live Tracking en temps réel.

Enregistrement des moindres détails
Le modèle Edge 510 enregistre les distances, les vitesses, les pentes, descente. Equipé de capteurs de vitesse et de performance, vous pourrer analyser toutes vos séances d'entraînement. Vous pourrez également sélectionner l'un des modes d'entraînement mémorisé : entraînement ou compétition. Une fois votre entraînement terminé, vous pourrez voir vos meilleures performances sur l'écran de l'appareil.

Fonctions Online
Il est possible de relier le modèle Edge 510 à un Smartphone (Apple ou Android) et de l'utiliser avec l'application Garmin Connect Mobile. Live Tracking permettra, par exemple, à vos amis de suivre votre position et performances en temps réel sur le site Garmin Connect Live Track. Envoyez tout simplement des invitations par e-Mail, Facebook ou Twitter. Profitez également de nombreuses fonctions Online : informations météorologiques, affichage de l'itinéraire parcouru et transfert de parcours de Edge à Garmin Connect.

Live tracking
La fonction Live Tracking permet à vos amis de suivre vos activités et performances en temps réel. Envoyez tout simplement une invitation. Il suffira à votre invité de cliquer sur un lien pour pouvoir suivre vos performance

Commentaires en ligne

4.7 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
2
4 étoiles
1
3 étoiles
0
2 étoiles
0
1 étoile
0
Voir les 3 commentaires client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients

Meilleurs commentaires des clients

Par Dan Merry TOP 1000 COMMENTATEURS le 18 juin 2014
Taille: TU
J'ai acheté ce compteur afin de me défaire des problèmes intermittents de fich USB de mon fidèle edge 500 qui avait presque tout ce dont j'avais besoin pour suivre mes progrès sur vélo de route. L'interface a renouvelée et la navigation simplifiée grâce à l'utilisation d'un écran tactile dont je n'ai pas encore eu le plaisir de tester avec mes gants, saison oblige. Au niveau de la connectivité j'apprécie la présence du Bluetooth qui m'évite d'utiliser le cable USB. De ce qui est du coffret, il contient, un manuel rapide, le compteur et deux supports que je n'utilise pas, mais à leurs places j'ai acheté un support vissable. L'écran reste fournit et offre la possibilité de présenter les mesures qui sont pertinentes à votre situation. En terme de capteur, le nec plus ultra reste le powermeter qui reste malheureusement très cher, il y a aussi les cardiofrequencementre et pour finir le capteur de cadence. J'ai utilisé le GC10 qui était de bien mauvaise facture, j’attends donc de tester son remplaçant. En somme, le edge 510 un compteur de très bonne qualité dont les fonctions conviendront aux cyclistes en quête de données riches. Il reste à noter qui vous pourrez difficilement l'utiliser pour la navigation GPS traditionnelle, il reste cependant un très bon produit.
4 commentaires 5 personnes ont trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus
Taille: TU Achat vérifié
aucun problème, répond parfaitement à mes attentes.
Remarque sur ce commentaire 2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus
Par Gilbert VIOT le 17 novembre 2013
Taille: TU Achat vérifié
Possesseur de l'EDGE 500 et l'ayant perdu, j'ai acheté le 510.
La connexion avec un smarphone et le suivi en temps réel sont parfait, vraiment sympa
Remarque sur ce commentaire 4 personnes ont trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta) (Peut contenir des commentaires issus du programme Early Reviewer Rewards)

Amazon.com: 4.1 étoiles sur 5 233 commentaires
595 internautes sur 626 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
1.0 étoiles sur 5 Do not upgrade from Edge 500 31 mars 2013
Par Bart N. - Publié sur Amazon.com
Taille: TU Achat vérifié
First of all, I've been using Amazon for several years and bought countless number of products and I've been always happy. This is the first time I'm writing a review, because I'd like to warn other users before making a mistake I did.

I've been using Garmin Edge 500 for almost 2 years and I simply love it. It's small, accurate and never failed me. One of the reasons I wanted to upgrade was to have a bigger screen (I was excited about 10 fields per screen 510 offers). Another and the most important reason was support for GLONASS system (500 on a few occasions wasn't too accurate in canyons or forests) and I was hoping to have a better GPS signal. The fact that 810 doesn't come with GLONASS was the reason I chose 510 (otherwise I'd go with 810). This still puzzles me as to why Garmin decided not to include GLONASS in 810.

As soon as the package arrived, I eagerly unpacked it and realized that the device was larger than I thought. I connected it to my computer to transfer my old profile and the first thing I noticed was that it had less free space on the device. 500 has about 50MB while 510 has only 22MB and some of that is taken by the system files leaving around 17MB. Garmin, really?! How much would it cost to add more flash memory? 50 cents? Just to give you some idea - a typical longer ride with 1 second recording takes about 500Kb-1MB. It's convenient to keep a few rides on the device before uploading to the computer. When I researched this issue I found out that some users were unable to update software, because the updated would take 9MB space and it wasn't enough... Note taken, but it was still manageable.

I had set up the device, created two bike profiles and went for a test ride, which happened to be my commute next morning. And this is when the sky fell. The screen is totally unusable in the sunlight. I was like, I must have screwed up something, this cannot be. I turned on the backlight permanently at maximum setting and yet it wasn't light enough to get the same contrast as my old 500. Then I realized two issues. First of all, the new screen has less sharper font, because it has a color screen and practically the resolution is lower than 500 and secondly it uses a different technology which is more susceptible to daylight. I live in California where we have 300+ sunny days in a year and 510 simply sucks. That was a big disappointment. I tried various settings, changing angle, etc. Still not as good as my old 500. Same data field, in a 8-field screen setup, is less readable than on 500. If you actually look as to why, you will see that Garmin decided to use larger font for labels, which wasted a lot of space and left actual numbers smaller and less readable. This whole color screen is a BS. It doesn't allow any customization and simple degrades readability. For instance, I'd love to set up different colors for different power/heart zones. It'd be cool to see I'm exceeding my power threshold just by looking at different text/background color. Apparently, Garmin engineers thought it was a better idea to use color primarily for the grid lines...

Like it was not enough, after my ride back home, I carefully compared elevation profiles between 510 and 500. 510 showed twice as much elevation gain on the same route and when I zoomed in, some segments had a bumpy line where I'd normally expect a flat line (50% of my commute is at sea level). Sorry Garmin, another epic failure. It's hard to understand why it would be worse than the old generation. Again, I found some users complaining about the very same reason and it didn't surprise me.

I'm sending my Garmin back to Amazon thanks to the great return policy and I advice anyone who is considering buying 510 to think twice. Don't make the same mistake as I did.

Garmin, please wake up.
16 internautes sur 16 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 A mixed bag. 12 mai 2013
Par Hans Lellelid - Publié sur Amazon.com
Taille: TU Achat vérifié
I have been using an Edge 305 for a few years. When the 510 came out, I decided I would spring for the upgrade. I've been using the Edge 510 now for several months and have explored most, if not all, of the featureset.

There are some good things about this device, so let me start there.

- The battery life is much better than my 305. The ~15 hours seems about right; I no longer have to worry that I'll run out of battery on a double century or hundred-mile mtb ride.
- Similarly, the storage limitations of the 305 are gone too. When recording routes with "every second" resolution, there was only room for 3.5 hours of recording in the 305, which meant having to use the lower granularity recording for a longer ride or for cases where I wasn't gonna plug it in after every ride.
- Speaking of plugging in, I love the bluetooth sync; it's not perfect (it sometimes uploads rides, but they don't appear in the app), but it works well 80-90% of the time. Of course, I really want the data in Strava, which means some extra clicks or use of services like garminsync (or, in my case, I just wrote a simple script to do it for me).
- On the whole I find the ride recording interface more intuitive. It was very unintuitive how with the 305 you had to "reset" the computer when you started your next ride (if you hadn't plugged in to upload the previous one). Also it was easy to ride away and forget to hit "start". The 510 prompts you to "save" (or "discard") your ride when you click the pause button. Similarly it presents a message when it detects you are moving and have not started the ride. On the whole this is better.
- I like how many data screens are available and how easy it is to customize them per activity profile. Lots more display room than the 305 too, so I don't feel like I have to leave fields off if I want to be able to read the display.
- And finally, the LiveTrack feature works pretty well. I used this for an all-day road ride recently. It does use additional battery; my phone (HTC One X) died after it had been tracking for 10 hours. My phone would have died after 2 hours of GPS usage, so it's obviously much less draw, but it's still something to consider. (My normal battery life is a full day or 12-14 hours of rather minimal use, so it's not exactly stellar to start with.)

Now, I do have some issues with this device. Some more significant than others.

- Navigation turn notifications (when riding courses) effectively do not work. If you create a route in Garmin Connect, you will not get any turn notifications. If you try to export a TCX file from RideWithGPS, you will discover that the Edge 510 doesn't support TCX (!!) You can try converting that to FIT (there are some online tools), but reports are that you won't get the turn notifications (I never got this to successfully work, so can't really comment). If you subscribe to a premium account on RideWithGPS and write a TCX file directly to the device this -- oddly -- works. Or I should say it "half works". For a recent 100+ mile ride, it loaded the turn notifications for the first half of the ride only. That, you can imagine, was pretty infuriating 50 miles into the ride. I wrote to Garmin technical support to report this glaring issue, and they responded by telling me that the 510 did not support maps and that I should buy an 810 if I want maps. I wrote back to tell them that I'm not an idiot. I don't want a map; I want turn notifications. This feature worked great on the Edge 305.

- The weather feature is absolute garbage. The station granularity is very coarse and doesn't appear to update. I commute 16 miles which takes me from being relatively close to one airport to being relatively close to another, but the device will hang onto whichever one is closest when I start and not change. The weather alerts are absolutely ridiculous. I get a message on my screen (which I have to click to acknowledge!!) which says "Weather Alert - English Watch". What the hell does that mean? So I click in to see the alert and it says. "Watch - 7" or some other number code. Hilarious. The last time I cross-referenced with a weather app on my phone to realize that the warning was "wildfire conditions". I'm glad Garmin was trying to cryptically warned me about that. And there's no way to disable just the weather alert feature. Stupid. (Update: as noted in the comments, you can at least disable weather completely which will also disable weather alerts.)

- And finally, it is a little annoying that you have to click to acknowledge all of the devices that it finds when it starts up, but this isn't that big of a deal. It means clicking the screen 4 or 5 times before you can start riding.

On the whole, I don't regret upgrading from the 305. I still have the 305 and I'm not tempted to use it. On the other hand, the navigation issue is very disappointing and Garmin support left an impression of complete incompetence when it came to addressing this problem. I am hopeful that future firmware and app updates fix many of these issues, but it might be worth waiting for that before upgrading.
167 internautes sur 174 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
1.0 étoiles sur 5 Great potential, but too many bugs currently. 19 avril 2013
Par Brandon Smith - Publié sur Amazon.com
As an owner of the 500, I upgraded because I live in San Francisco and do urban rides in which its hard to maintain GPS coverage, the GLONASS was a strong selling point to me.

Pros:
-GLONASS works as advertised, pick up GPS FAST, even in the middle of downtown SF.
-UI is sleek, innovative and easy to use
-Measures everything I want it to
-SO much potential here for this unit IF and WHEN they release the firmware to make it work

CONS:
-There is currently a known issue in which all ANT+ sensors randomly drop out and both show and record bad data making this useless.
-Elevation data is incorrect, I am hoping this is a firmware fix, but worried its actually hardware. THis unit shows 2-3X the elevation gain/loss that my 500 or iPhone apps do on the same rides. This is also a known and common issues according to the forum boards and Strava CS.
-Battery life is not great, not anywhere near what the 500 was, maybe 50% of it
-Screen is not as easy to read as the 500, often leaving you wanting the backlight, but this unit will only last about 6 hours with backlight running
-Notification system is ridiculous, every time there is a notification the whole screen dims and you must physically touch the unit to dismiss it. IF you are in the middle of a workout this can really cripple your ability to execute and enjoy your workout.
-Garmin continues to see Strava/Training Peaks and other 3rd party sites as their competition rather than the reasons we buy their unit in the first place. As such they block these other apps from either being able to connect to the unit to gather data, or utilize the bluetooth connectivity to automatically post your ride to their sites. Garmin only lets you upload via the bluetooth directly to garmin connect which is years behind Strava in terms of development and features.
-Weather updates do not work as advertised, but they are incredibly annoying. For example, I was out riding and every single minute it would push me a "flood warning" that would block my access to the data and screens until I dismissed it.
-Following courses is slow and buggy, much like the 500 that never had its feature fixed.

All in all, this unit has a lot of potential if and when it gets the updates it needs to work properly. Unfortunately, Garmin is unresponsive to its users and slow to release firmware updates for known bugs despite the thousands of angry posts on their forum boards. They may regret this someday when a viable competitor releases a product that can rival theirs. Instead of innovating, working with partners such a Strava, testing their products prior to release, and acting on known issues, they have began to act like a monopolistic company would.

If you train with a power meter, or rely on your other sensors such as speed/heart rate, your best bet is to watch their forum boards and hold off buying until Garmin posts a fix to all the issues this unit is currently having. A fix was recently posted for the 810 that helped some, but not all of the similar issues the 810 was having, but the 510 has been left out in the dark. If history is any indication they will get this right, but they will be slow and not address all the issues. Past users of the 500 can attest to this, along with early adopters of most any of their units.

I'll happily adjust my rating once Garmin gets these issues fixed. THis has the potential to be a 5 star unit, but the fact they released it in its current state says a lot about Garmin as a whole.
6 internautes sur 6 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Slick device that meets my needs 21 mai 2015
Par Dangerous - Publié sur Amazon.com
Achat vérifié
Prior to buying the Garmin, I was using a wired computer for front wheel speed and distance only + my iPhone running Strava to log GPS data.

Since I've already got a few years into Strava, any upgrades would need to provide continuity. Knowing that the initial release of the last round of Garmin computers were Bluetooth capable and we're working with Garmin connect, I figured it'd be a matter of time before Strava & Connect became compatible.

Thank you Garmin & Strava for finding common ground. History is key to making data valuable & starting over would have been a pain.

Recent updates allow Garmin to sync to Strava automatically - pretty legit.

The unit shipped with everything: HR monitor, cadence/speed sensor, and plenty of mounting options. Not sure that I'll use the tether, but better to give me more than what I'd need vs not enough.

Mounting was simple & quick. Only recommendation would be providing an aero spoke friendly magnet for the sensor. I've got some pretty wide Mavic spokes that didn't fit, but I just repurposed my existing computer magnet - they're pretty universal.

Usability is great. Plenty of 100% customizable screen layouts that are relatively easy to access mid-ride. I did read a lot about screen visibility issues, but riding at dusk I've not run into major issues - though note that I've opted for backlighting. Nice feature for someone who likes evening/night rides (well, who has grown to with a recent move to a city).

I'd highly recommend this to anyone upgrading from a non-GPS enabled computer & definitely recommend looking into the functionality that comes with Garmin connect (if you're not already on MMR or Strava).
318 internautes sur 342 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Garmin 510 is better than other reviewers mention 30 juin 2013
Par jbpeddler - Publié sur Amazon.com
First off, I felt the need to leave a review on the Garmin 510 (with HR, Cadence, & extra out front mount) for several reasons. Many of the reviews here on Amazon can often be misleading- I will explain. I was debating between getting the 500 bundle or even 800 at a lower price since the release of the 510 & 810, but here is why I didn't. The Edge 510 bundle comes with the HR band, cadence sensor, the out front mount (which Garmin and others charge $40+ for), standard stem or bar mount, plus the bluetooth connectivity which includes "Live Tracking" with the Garmin Connect App on your smartphone. The advantages on the 510 over the 500 are simple: Color Touch Screen (500 is physical buttons, black and white screen), the actual screen on the 510 is larger (which is a happy medium size wise between the 500 and 800), easy selection of different bikes if you move the unit from one to another, and easy to use customization of the screens that can be more cumbersome on the 500.

This entire review can be summed up by watching this really cool video on YouTube video, but the review explains each feature in detail: [...]

Many reviewers mention that an upgrade to the 510 is not worth the investment- if you already have a 500, this may be a solid argument. If you have a 200, Garmin Watch, or no GPS at all, maybe an old school speed sensor and cadence computer- the Garmin 510 kit is worth every penny.

REASONS TO BUY THE EDGE 510 BUNDLE:

1) The screen is great, all other's who complain its hard to read are full of it- the screen does not have the sharp contrast of the 500, but it is full color, and its plenty bright (adjustable) and easy to read. Secondly, the color screen is a whole lot nicer to look at- kind of like the difference between an old DOS and a new Windows screen.

2) While it takes a little time to figure out how to program the various screens with Data to your needs, its easy once you figure it out. Also, you have to push the physical "ride" or "play" button on the front of the unit even after tapping "RIDE" onscreen, which is no big deal, you just have to do it, or your unit will not begin your ride or the timer. I think many of the complaints on the 510 come from users who either didn't read the manual, or lack some basic technology skills when it comes to phones, computers, tablets, or anything else. While the user interface on the 510 is still somewhat crude (in the early stages) compared to an iPhone, but it still is incredibly sophisticated, and is perfect for a very usable GPS computer on a road or mountain bike.

3) Bluetooth Connectivity, and Garmin "LiveTrack": This feature is touted by many buyers of this unit as not worthwhile, or a waste of technology for cyclists. BOGUS, the Bluetooth feature on the 510 and 810 are AWESOME. Here is why: my wife or friends can watch my rides live on their computers, tablets, or phones while I'm actually in route- in REAL TIME. We all know how tough it can be to ride a century in the summer heat, and potentially dangerous with cars, trucks, and just bad roads. What a perfect way to let your loved ones know where you are at any given moment? OK some of you are going to say there are already APPS for Android and iPhones that have this feature, and you don't need to waste $400 to buy a Garmin to get it. HERE IS WHERE YOUR WRONG: Anyone who has used these APPS knows that having your GPS turned on full time on your phone (which all APPS that track require) kills your phone battery, often times before your ride ever nears completion. The Garmin unit lets you turn off your phone GPS, all you need turned on is the Bluetooth so your Garmin can stay connected. While this may seem like a solution in search of a problem, it actually works very well. I took a 8 hour ride today, turned off my phone GPS, and at the end of the ride, the Garmin was still at 50% charge, and my phone was at 50% charge (iPhone 5). I could have potentially rode another 5-8 hours with both units turned on, Bluetooth on, and the Garmin Connect App running in the background all the while "Live Tracking" my entire ride.

4) FINALLY: One last feature (may seem trivial, but I think its pretty darn cool) that makes this unit a game changer is the automatic updates at the completion of your ride to Garmin Connect online. As soon as you hit the end ride button (and SAVE on screen) the Garmin unit uploads all the details of your entire ride to the Garmin Connect website for you and everyone to see (if you set it up that way) !!! OK, many of you are going to say that "Garmin Connect" sucks compared to STRAVA, so why would I want to automatically upload my ride to Garmin Connect? You would be right, except for a really cool third party plug in online called: "GARMIN SYNC" here's the website: [...]

I have listed the website here because it took me some time to find it. This website does one simple thing: It uploads your entire ride data from Garmin Connect directly into STRAVA!!! (AUTOMATICALLY.) You don't have to do a thing, once you set it up, every time your Garmin unit uploads your ride to Garmin Connect, this little plug in "pushes" your ride information to STRAVA, and I don't mean some half baked version, I MEAN THE ENTIRE RIDE- Including: Miles ridden, Time traveled, average heart rate, max heart rate, average speed, max speed, cadence, calories, energy output, power, suffer score (Strava Premium only) !! As far as I can tell, there is no difference between the "Auto" upload of a ride, or the old school plug the Garmin into your computer and upload to STRAVA method. Now some might make the argument they have to plug their Garmin in to charge it anyway, so why not plug into a computer to charge and upload your ride at the same time, why do I need the auto uploads? Here are a couple scenarios I can think of why this is useful: If your traveling, and don't want to bring a laptop to upload your rides, you don't need to. Also, at what point is plugging a device into your computer to upload anything going to become a thing of the past completely: sooner than later. iPhone IOS already does all of its updates from iPhones without ever having to plug them in anymore, not set up, backups, downloads, etc. Why shouldn't other devices be so simple?

5) Last but not least: While my review may seem long winded, there are so many great features of the 510 and 810, I felt it was necessary to review what they are, and what makes them better than the 500 or 800. If you use a smartphone, and can find your way around, these Garmin units are fantastic. I'm not a Garmin employee, or one of Garmin Sync, I'm just an average Joe who is massive cycling junkie, and I think the ride information provided by these Garmin models gives the average "Joe" information that used to only be available to pro cyclists, and that makes them fun in their own right. Why would anyone buy old technology when the new stuff is so much cooler? (assuming it works- and these work really well...)

6) I have purchased several different bar mounts for my iPhone to be able to use the cycle "APPS" that allow your phone to be used as a bike computer. They all are a pain, even an iPhone 5 which is smaller than most of the new Android phones on the market is still too big to mount on your handlebar, plus it just looks stupid. You have to turn the screen brightness up so high that if the GPS being on doesn't kill your battery, the screen brightness will. The beauty of the Garmin plus your phone is they just work together, very well I might add. You get the cool Garmin mounted out front, with its long life battery, and the phone stays in your jersey pocket, all the while tracking your ride in REAL time- its the best of both worlds. You get to save your phone's battery so you can use it a real emergency, which is why you carry it while riding your bike anyway.

CONS: The only con I can think of is that the learning curve is a little longer than the standard 500, or certainly the 200. If you want a super basic GPS without any of the "special" features I mention above, the Edge 200 or 500 will be fine. But based on my research, the 500 is usually only $50-$75 cheaper than the 510, and you don't get the "out front" mount I mention above- so the price is pretty close in the end.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous

Vous souhaitez découvrir plus de produits ? Consultez cette page pour voir plus : ceinture cardio

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique