Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.

Prix Kindle : EUR 29,30

EUR 15,82 (35%)

TVA incluse

Ces promotions seront appliquées à cet article :

Certaines promotions sont cumulables avec d'autres offres promotionnelles, d'autres non. Pour en savoir plus, veuillez vous référer aux conditions générales de ces promotions.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism (Pioneers of Conservation) par [Miller, Char]
Publicité sur l'appli Kindle

Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism (Pioneers of Conservation) Format Kindle

3.0 étoiles sur 5 1 commentaire client

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 29,30

Longueur : 464 pages Word Wise: Activé Langue : Anglais

Polars Polars

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

Miller's animated biography portrays Pinchot in all his fervor, and his environmentalism in all its complexity. --Booklist

Présentation de l'éditeur

" absorbing, well-researched, and illuminating life of an American leader who now receives the full attention he deserves." -MICHAEL BESCHLOSS, EDITOR OF AMERICAN HERITAGE ILLUSTRATED HISTORY OF THE PRESIDENTS

"Char Miller's lively, insightful account of the life and world of American forester Gifford Pinchot fills a vitally important gap in environmental and conservation history. Anyone captivated by the issues and controversies surrounding the preservation and development of the nation's natural heritage should read this engaging, carefully researched biography." -CAROLYN MERCHANT, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, AUTHOR OF THE DEATH OF NATURE

Gifford Pinchot is known primarily for his work as first chief of the U. S. Forest Service and for his argument that resources should be used to provide the "greatest good for the greatest number of people." But Pinchot was a more complicated figure than has generally been recognized, and more than half a century after his death, he continues to provoke controversy.

Gifford Pinchot and the Making of Modern Environmentalism, the first new biography in more than three decades, offers a fresh interpretation of the life and work of the famed conservationist and Progressive politician. In addition to considering Gifford Pinchot's role in the environmental movement, historian Char Miller sets forth an engaging description and analysis of the man -- his character, passions, and personality -- and the larger world through which he moved.

Char Miller begins by describing Pinchot's early years and the often overlooked influence of his family and their aspirations for him. He examines Gifford Pinchot's post-graduate education in France and his ensuing efforts in promoting the profession of forestry in the United States and in establishing and running the Forest Service. While Pinchot's twelve years as chief forester (1898-1910) are the ones most historians and biographers focus on, Char Miller also offers an extensive examination of Pinchot's post-federal career as head of The National Conservation Association and as two-term governor of Pennsylvania. In addition, he looks at Pinchot's marriage to feminist Cornelia Bryce and discusses her role in Pinchot's political radicalization throughout the 1920s and 1930s. An epilogue explores Gifford Pinchot's final years and writings.

Char Miller offers a provocative reconsideration of key events in Pinchot's life, including his relationship with friend and mentor John Muir and their famous disagreement over damming Hetch Hetchy Valley. The author brings together insights from cultural and social history and recently discovered primary sources to support a new interpretation of Pinchot -- whose activism not only helped define environmental politics in early twentieth century America but remains strikingly relevant today.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 6521 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 464 pages
  • Editeur : Island Press; Édition : New edition (1 janvier 2004)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ASIN: B0057UD4WE
  • Synthèse vocale : Activée
  • X-Ray :
  • Word Wise: Activé
  • Composition améliorée: Non activé
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : 3.0 étoiles sur 5 1 commentaire client
  •  Voulez-vous faire un commentaire sur des images ou nous signaler un prix inférieur ?

click to open popover

Commentaires en ligne

3.0 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile
Voir le commentaire client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients

Meilleurs commentaires des clients

Format: Relié
Gifford Pinchot is such an curious fellow that reading about him is a must. This biography is not the best written but of interest for the material. It is certainly not on the same class as Edwin Morris's triology on Roosevelt.
Remarque sur ce commentaire Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) 4.3 étoiles sur 5 4 commentaires
9 internautes sur 9 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 Interesting biography but poorly organized 31 juillet 2007
Par Arthur Digbee - Publié sur
Format: Broché
This book provides a biography of the founder of American forestry, Gifford Pinchot. There are other biographies, and Miller justifies this one in a strange way - - he argues that people too frequently see Pinchot as a transition between the West's nineteenth-century exploiters and twentieth-century environmentalists. However, Miller's account doesn't really challenge this portrayal, other than showing that Pinchot's perspective on sustainable development remains alive and well today.

A better justification would have emphasized that Miller gives serious attention to Pinchot's two terms as the governor of Pennsylvania. This part of the story allows Miller to pick up non-forestry themes such as economic justice, and to show how they shaped Pinchot's earlier career as Chief Forester. The coverage of Pinchot's later career is a real strength of the book, as are the comparisons between progressive Republican governor Pinchot (PA) and progressive Democratic governor FDR (NY) during the Great Depression. Both argued for a "New Deal," and the Republican rejection of Pinchot reflects fundamental changes in that party just as much as FDR's recasting of the Democrats changed American politics for 50 years.

Interesting as many of these stories are, the book has its frustrations for the reader. Miller often tells a part of Pinchot's story and then reaches back to grab narrative bits that belong earlier in the book, both chronologically and analytically. For example, Miller's story of Pinchot's campaign for governor gets him elected, and then reaches back to discuss his key support coalition. That coalition included prohibitionists, mineworkers, and women (suffragettes). Each of those groups reflects an important feature of Pinchot's character - - he was practically a teetotaler, he was socially progressive, and he had evolved toward gender equality. Each could have been part of the story much earlier, but all three come more or less as a surprise (the mineworkers are a partial exception). That surprise highlights an important flaw in Miller's strategy, in that he does not lay a sufficient foundation for the events he discusses.

The discussion of Pinchot's family life is similarly incoherent. It is the subject of some chapters but also appears as passages in other chapters, but does not appear in chronological order. The death of a near-fiancée, for example, appears mid-book despite its implications for both his professional and personal life.

Those are but two illustrations of a pattern throughout this book. It may be that the book consists of independently-written essays that Miller didn't edit sufficiently before including them in the book. Or it may be that Miller was trying to avoid a purely chronological biography but did not write a fully thematic one. Whatever the explanation, the organizational weakness detracts from what is otherwise an interesting story about an important figure in American political and environmental history.
3 internautes sur 3 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Gifford Pinchot is No Longer Bastardized 28 février 2011
Par Theresa Young - Publié sur
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
Gifford Pinchot and the Making of a Modern Environmentalism. By Char Miller. (Washington DC: Island Press, 2001. 458 pp. ISBN 1-55963-822-2. Call no. S926.P56 M55 2001.)
Reviewed by Theresa Young
Char Miller investigates Gifford Pinchot's impact on forestry and how he is misrepresented as an extreme utilitarian conservative. The author proves Pinchot's morals originated from his conservative family and they helped evolve his standards of forestry. Miller claims these standards still connect to environmental topics and can be applied at the present time. The author introduces new primary source documents formally un-researched or used in prior books on the subject. Miller represents Pinchot as an evolving man, heavily influenced by the Trans-Atlantic Progressive Connection and assures his readers Pinchot's words are relevant in today's world. Miller proves Gifford Pinchot advanced the world of forestry and created a long-lived debate in his wake concerning the correct path of preserving our Nations forests with his progressive actions in a non-progressive world.
The overall theme of Miller's book is to correct historians like Roderick Nash and Stephen Fox, who claim Gifford Pinchot was but a stepping stone in the path of the budding field of environmentalism. These authors claim John Muir is the central figure in developing the ecological vision we now know and both authors, Miller states, sweep Gifford Pinchot to the side (p. 8). According to Miller, Pinchot was not a quiet nature lover who enjoyed pleasing his critics, "[h]e felt most at home swimming against the tides," (p.272) thus making people feel passionate about their ideals and more apt to engage in debates. Miller explains how Pinchot combined political, economic, and natural landscapes into his conservation agenda in search of the best options for the public good. The combination of these three issues, Miller states, is why Pinchot made many enemies in the field of forestry and debated them frequently.
The author devotes a considerable amount of pages to the Pinchot family and how Gifford was raised to appreciate all aspects of nature. The first two chapters discuss his parents and their heritage at length; in chapter three the reader learns more about Gifford himself. Miller mentions the author George P. Marsh as an influence on Gifford Pinchot: a new copy of Marsh's book The Earth as Modified by Human Action or Man and Nature (1882) was presented to Pinchot for his twenty-first birthday (p. 55). This is an important key to remember - Marsh's book spoke of the evils of clear cutting forests, a tactic some people said Pinchot supported and practiced. Miller writes in chapter fourteen about Al Wiener, a specialist with the Forest Service in the 1970s, and how he selected Pinchot's earliest writings deliberately to find excerpts in support of clear-cutting. Wiener reduced Pinchot's ideas to provide evidence in support of clear cutting parts of Montana's forests (p. 358). This is central to the book. Miller shows how people narrow and misinterpret Pinchot's work: he seemed conservative in the beginning, when he was barely educated, but Miller reminds us Pinchot evolved into a fully Progressive forester with his eye on the public good. Marsh's words are mentioned numerous times throughout the book, leading one to wonder why Pinchot would ever support clear cutting of forests when his favorite author was adamantly against it.
Gifford Pinchot and the Making of a Modern Environmentalism does not proceed in chronological order, the chapters are written surrounding a single topic. Donald Worster notes this in his review of the book, the chapters are, "chronologically disjointed and [written in a] confusing way" (Worster 2002). The chapter sequence I feel made for a better book; following one issue through completely no matter the time-line providing a more leisurely read. Almost every chapter also includes a photo or two, allowing the reader to connect with the characters easily. James A. Pritchard describes the book as, "[w]ritten with verve and insight and richly illustrated with anecdotes and photographs, this book deserves the widest possible audience" (Pritchard 2002) and this reviewer agrees with him.
Char Miller is professor and chair of the history department at Trinity University in Texas. He wrote a great book about a topic in a new light. He successfully achieved his goal with this reader; Gifford Pinchot is no longer bastardized in my mind. The author brought exciting sources forward for historians to formulate new ideas about the environmental movement of the twentieth century. The personal correspondence between the immediate family members is a main key to understanding the characters on a deeper level: Pinchot became civic minded due to his strong familiar ties. Gifford Pinchot was an evolving man without a static frame of mind; modern environmentalist should copy his methods of governmental legislation persuasion and they will love this book.

Works Cited:
Pritchard, James A. "Review." Oregon Historical Quarterly 103 (2002): 387-389.
Worster, Donald. " Review." The Western Historical Quarterly 33 (2002): 491-492.
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Four Stars 8 novembre 2014
Par Mary Mason - Publié sur
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
as described and quick shipping.
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Five Stars 18 septembre 2015
Par Peggy Sterling - Publié sur
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
should be good
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous