• Tous les prix incluent la TVA.
Il ne reste plus que 5 exemplaire(s) en stock (d'autres exemplaires sont en cours d'acheminement).
Expédié et vendu par Amazon. Emballage cadeau disponible.
+ EUR 2,99 (livraison en France métropolitaine)
D'occasion: Très bon | Détails
Vendu par Nearfine
État: D'occasion: Très bon
Commentaire: Petites traces d'usage. Livraison prévue entre 2 et 3 semaines.
Vous l'avez déjà ?
Repliez vers l'arrière Repliez vers l'avant
Ecoutez Lecture en cours... Interrompu   Vous écoutez un extrait de l'édition audio Audible
En savoir plus
Voir les 3 images

Let Them Eat Prozac: The Unhealthy Relationship Between the Pharmaceutical Industry And Depression (Anglais) Broché – 1 octobre 2006

4,1 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
7
4 étoiles
3
3 étoiles
1
2 étoiles
2
1 étoile
0
4,1 étoiles sur 5 13 commentaires provenant des USA

Voir les 4 formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Broché
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 21,86
EUR 18,86 EUR 18,31
Note: Cet article est éligible à la livraison en points de collecte. Détails
Récupérer votre colis où vous voulez quand vous voulez.
  • Choisissez parmi 17 000 points de collecte en France
  • Les membres du programme Amazon Prime bénéficient de livraison gratuites illimitées
Comment commander vers un point de collecte ?
  1. Trouvez votre point de collecte et ajoutez-le à votre carnet d’adresses
  2. Sélectionnez cette adresse lors de votre commande
Plus d’informations

rentrée scolaire 2017 rentrée scolaire 2017

click to open popover

Offres spéciales et liens associés


Description du produit

[ LET THEM EAT PROZAC THE UNHEALTHY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AND DEPRESSION BY HEALY, DAVID](AUTHOR)PAPERBACK

Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.



Détails sur le produit

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur Amazon.fr
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta) (Peut contenir des commentaires issus du programme Early Reviewer Rewards)

Amazon.com: 4.1 étoiles sur 5 13 commentaires
7 internautes sur 7 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 a burden of proof. 26 septembre 2007
Par M. Jehenson - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Broché Achat vérifié
A book to read if somebody in your family is considering taking SSRI. Not so much to go agaisnt medical advice but to recognize subsequent side effect that would alert the family member to an untoward reaction from taking the medication. A good book to read also for physicians who are prescribing or seeing patients who take SSRIs. This book goes into many details , from case studies to marketing and legal issues concerning the pharmaceutical companies 's handling of SSRIs. It is a compelling case for a cover up for serious side effects. Even if it only looks at one side of the story, it is a pretty large burden of proof. Not an easy read.
105 internautes sur 110 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 honesty at last 16 juillet 2004
Par fern - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
Having been a pharmacist for 24 yrs I can say with depressing certainty that MDs have absolutely minimal understanding of the drugs they prescribe. They receive only the barest instruction in pharmacology in med school, and the majority of their ongoing drug education seems to come from pharmaceutical reps. This book just further validates observations I have already made about the side effects of Prozac and its cousins. The detail involved in the handling of the subject matter may be too technical for the casual reader but would be fascinating to healthcare professionals and attorneys. It underscores the penalties to be paid by honest researchers and healthcare professionals in this market-driven economy by those who dare to challenge the data put out by companies with huge profits to make and to protect--and who also have the financial resources to ruin anyone who tells the truth about their products. It reinforces what should be a guiding principal in most areas of life: before believing what you are told, ask who profits by your gullibility and need. And do not be too quick to distrust your own instincts and observations.
29 internautes sur 33 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 Disturbing, somewhat useful, murky 7 mai 2006
Par Bob Fancher - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
This important book undermines its effectiveness by jumbling together several distinct story lines:
1. The influence of pharmaceutical money on science and the practice of medicine.
2. The value of antidepressants versus their troubling side effects, most notably suicidality.
3. The legal battles over (a) the "Prozac defense" and (b) product liability of Lilly for adverse drug reactions.
4. Dr. Healy's personal travails as a result of his concerns about the safety of SSRI's.

Jumbling these related-but-different issues together results in a murky book, in which none of the four stories emerges clearly.

In general, Dr. Healy's views on these issues seem to be
1. Pharmaceutical money has badly corrupted both science and clinical practice.
2. Antidepressants and other psychotropics are important tools, but because the science and clinical practice have been skewed by pharmaceutical companies, they are over-prescribed, mis-prescribed, and generally used injudiciously.
3. The only reason his side has lost the legal battles that it has lost is the corrupt influence of pharma, and
4. He got screwed by the Evil powers.

I found the cases he made for points 1 and 2 (if I teased them out of the murk correctly) fairly persuasive, the case for point 3 provocative but not entirely compelling, and the case for point 4 hard to judge.

If you have a fair amount of patience and a serious interest in the different story lines Dr. Healy addresses, and if you know enough about the methodological issues involved in different ways of doing research to evaluate his criticisms of the preferred methodologies of pharmaceutical-funded research, the book is certainly worth reading. Otherwise, I suspect you will find the book more confusing and (probably) misleading than enlightening.
1 internautes sur 1 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Five Stars 9 juillet 2014
Par Deanna Spingola - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle Achat vérifié
Wonderful book!
4 internautes sur 4 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 A PSYCHIATRIST TELLS THE STORY OF PROZAC, AND ITS SCARY IMPLICATIONS 17 octobre 2013
Par Steven H Propp - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: Format Kindle
Author David Healy is psychiatrist and a former secretary of the British Association for Psychopharmacology, as well as the author of other books such as Pharmageddon, The Creation of Psychopharmacology, The Antidepressant Era, etc. He was also one of the early doctors to begin prescribing Prozac. He wrote in the Preface to this 2004 book, "Rooms full of data pointed to the fact that the Prozac drug group could trigger suicide and violence, and that companies reproducing these drugs knew of the problem... The Prozac story brings interlinked problems to light, among them a creation of depression on ... a scale as to raise questions about whether pharmaceutical and other health care companies are more wedded to making profits from health than contributing to it... pharmaceutical companies are now better at marketing drugs than at making them." (Pg. xiii-xiv) He adds, "I write this as someone committed to pharmacotherapy. In my opinion... hoping psychotherapy alone will do the job, is a romantic notion... This book is a history in that some of the key questions have now been answered conclusively---SSRIs can trigger suicidal tendencies. But it is still not clear what has been an honest mistake and what a conspiracy." (Pg. xvi)

He notes, "After publication of the article of SSRIs and suicide ... I received calls from the Citizen's Commission on Human Rights, an organization linked to the Church of Scientology... I refused to take any of the calls. The Church of Scientology was not a group with whom I would wish to have any association. Indeed, their espousal of the 'Prozac is a problem' position made me, and I'm sure others who saw problems with Prozac, more sympathetic to [drug manufacturer] Lilly's position." (Pg. 55)

In a court case, he notes that two "negative" testifiers "completely missed the issue of how relatively ineffective Prozac was for depression. No one asked the simple question: If Prozac was a better serotonin reputake inhibitor than older antidepressants, and if serotonin was lowered in depression, why wasn't Prozac bringing about recoveries in hospital depressions quicker than older drugs?... In their effort to land a punch on this target, they missed the fact that Prozac couldn't be shown to work at all in severe depression." (Pg. 69-70)

He states, "there is no longer any guarantee that publication even in the most prestigious journals means that the results adequately reflect the data from clinical trials. And as the SSRI and suicide story unfolds... we will see how a number of the best-known journals have published articles on ths SSRI and suicide issue so riddled with gross methodological inadequacies that it becomes difficult to see how they could ever have been published on the basis of scientific merit." (Pg. 119)

He laments, "No one had warned these women they might ever feel the way they had done on either of these pills. One study had been about how well people could be and whether anyone could be made 'better than well.' We never thought to warn anyone about suicidal ideation. Even with my background, I saw the possibility of making totally normal people suicidal in this way as a merely theoretical risk." (Pg. 185) He adds, "This material had been lying around for years before the first public concerns were raised for Prozac. Why had it played no part in the debate hitherto? Why did regulators not know that what these studies had found? Why were no academic voices raised demanding access to this material?... Was it merely coincidence that pretty much as soon as I walked through the door of Pfizer's archives to look for these data, I got the sack?" (Pg. 193)

He notes, "One of the many chilling things about the Prozac story is that a mistake or consequence or a conspiracy would probably have cost fewer lives. Instead, a sequence of historical events made a poor drug fashionable, made the treatment of an illness all but a matter of public policy, and removed the natural cautions and safeguards that should have saved us. In the midst of this, the one group with a professional brief, because of prescription-only arrangments, to save us from ourselves---physicians---appears to have followed its self-interest as much, if not more, than any other party to the story." (Pg. 251) He suggests, "Making the raw data available would do more to keep researchers and universities honest than any of the research safeguards or ethical frameworks that universities are busily trying to put in place to manage links between industry and academia." (Pg. 278)

This book will be of keen interest to anyone studying contemporary psychopharmacology.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous