- Outlet Anciennes collections, fin de séries, articles commandés en trop grande quantité, … découvrez notre sélection de produits à petits prix Profitez-en !
- Fan de randonnée, adèpte du camping ? Visitez notre boutique randonnée et camping et retrouvez des milliers de tentes, sacs de randonnée, sacs de couchage, vêtements... et faites votre choix parmi les marques Columbia, Coleman, Gerber, High Peak, Lafuma, MILLET, Victorinox... et beaucoup d'autres.
- Fan de sport ? Visitez notre boutique vêtements de sport et retrouvez des milliers de vêtements de randonnée, running, cyclisme... ainsi que les marques sportswear Roxy, Rip Curl, Puma, Quiksilver et beaucoup d'autres...
Osprey Porter 46 Travel Pack - Black
Nous ne savons pas quand cet article sera de nouveau approvisionné ni s'il le sera.
- Compartiment pour portable rembourré (jusqu'à 15,4")
- poche interne réservée à une tablette
- Ceinture pectorale avec sifflet
- Compartiment zippé anti-rayure pour lunettes de soleil et appareil électronique
Les clients ayant consulté cet article ont également regardé
Quels sont les autres articles que les clients achètent après avoir regardé cet article?
Offres spéciales et liens associés
Description du produit
• Informations supplémentaires: - Compartiment pour portable rembourré (jusqu'à 15,4") - Poche interne réservée à une tablette - Ceinture pectorale avec sifflet - Compartiment zippé anti-rayure pour lunettes de soleil et appareil électronique - Sangles de compression StraightJacket - Quatre anses - Compartiment facilement accessible pour les liquides ou accessoires - Compartiment de rangement devant - Système de sangle de compression interne pour plus de stabilité - Compartiment interne pour ranger des documents - Porte-clefs intérieur - Poches filet latérales intérieures - Cadre périphérique léger - Accès au compartiment principal par fermeture à glissière verrouillable - Compartiments extensibles maillés Équipement • Avec une bande d'épaule • Avec poignée Volume • Catégorie de taille: 46 - 60 l Dimensions • Poids: 1090 g • Taille (L x P x H):: 57 x 36 x 24 cm • Volume: 46 l Sac • Type: sac à dos valise • Système de fermeture: fermeture éclair
Meilleurs commentaires des clients
Et il est particulièrement pratique pour se bouger avec flexibilité.
Très solide, avec des fermetures éclair de qualité, il est aussi extrêmement bien organisé.
Je peux mettre mon ordinateur dans la poche extérieure, ce qui est particulièrement pratique lors des contrôles de sécurité aux aéroports.
Il dispose de plein de rangements et permet d'optimiser au mieux son espace. Je le conseille aux backpackers qui voyagent beaucoup comme moi et n'utilisent jamais de bagage en soute.
Très content de mon achat.
Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com
Based on the glowing reviews, the Osprey Porter 46, Farpoint 40 (size S-M), and Farpoint 55 (also size S-M, with a length of 24") all seemed like possibilities. My first inclination was toward the Porter 46, but I couldn't make up my mind without a side-by-side comparison. Noting that I had the possibility of free returns on two out of these these, I ordered them all. When I had them all together, I filled some packing cubes, got my laptop (which was going to have to come on the trip), and set about trying them all.
The basics: The Porter 46 is like a semi-firm duffle bag, with hide-away shoulder straps and a passable hip belt. The Farpoints have an internal, light-weight frame, shoulder straps, and a more supportive hip belt hidden by a zippered flap. The Farpoint 55 has a daypack that zippers onto the main pack, but can also attach in front of your body, to the shoulder straps.
The Porter 46 won out for us, pretty much hands down. It had these advantages:
+ Semi-rigid side walls. The firm sides make it much easier to pack, and give it a feeling of greater depth--like packing a little travel suitcase.
+ More rip-resistant in appearance. The bag looks like it could take a pretty good beating, whereas the Farpoints (particularly the Farpoint 55) are made of much lighter material.
+ Organizing pockets. The Porter 46 has a zippered pocket along each sidewall, and a number of organizing pockets (for laptop, e-reader, pens, documents) in the front compartment. If you are a traveling professional, this is a definite attraction. And it was just obvious that the better accessibility here was going to make security and immigration that much easier.
+ The hide-away shoulder strap system is pretty awesome; I did not like the whole zippered-compartment-thing of the Farpoints.
+ You hardly have any loose straps. Not so much an issue with the Farpoint 40, but the Farpoint 55 seemed to have them flopping all around.
If we were going to be doing more hiking about, then I would reconsider the Farpoints. The hip suspension is definitely better, they are of lighter construction, and the packs squeeze everything closer to your center of gravity. The zip-away day pack on the Farpoint 55 is certainly an intriguing feature. If you know how to pack light and tight, and are going to be on your feet a lot, these would probably be better choices.
Some have commented that the Porter 46 should not have been designed with the laptop sleeve in the front, where it throws more weight off your center of gravity. Perhaps. On the other hand, it does make your laptop more readily accessible for security checks, and it does function as a nice flat surface that the compression straps can leverage.
The Farpoint 40 at first struck me as the perfect fit for wifey, especially with the better suspension. But then I remembered how she much she usually packs, and I knew there was no way she was going to be satisfied with the 40. The Porter 46 at least gives her the option of packing more, if she really feels it's worth carrying.
Our trip is in November, and I'm usually pretty good about updating my reviews if something interesting comes up. If I don't, assume that we both found our bags perfect for this trip!
UPDATE 2015-01-27: A great trip, and both our Porter 46 bags proved to be the perfect choice! They are easily converted to/from backpack mode, hold lots of stuff, are strong and well-made, and are aesthetically pleasing, too (although when loaded, they don't stand up when left on their side--a consequence of the compression design). My comment about the laptop sleeve stands: it's great for a small laptop or tablet, but leave anything larger at home.
We paired up the Osprey Day Lite packs with these, which we also found to be a great choice for our little excursions. But while they do attach to the larger Porter 46, I found the attachment process awkward. Plus, it's not really an optimal solution unless you are carrying relatively little in the Porter; otherwise, the bags just protrude too much, and straps hang down and flop all over. But they have a nice handle on the top (formed by the shoulder straps), which makes them very easy to tote around when you've got the Porter on your back.
Why I chose the Osprey: even though it wasn’t the largest of the three, it was still large, had good back support, good construction (see specifics below), it wasn’t horribly expensive, and it looked sharp. There is also the added bonus that you can attach a daypack to the front so you don’t have to carry two bags. I practiced packing in it with packing cubes for a 2 week trip and it was amazing. I fit so much in it.
What mattered to me, in order of importance:
-the most space possible in a carry on
TLS Motherlode 3299 cu. in.
Osprey Porter 2772 cu. in.
Tortuga 2,685 cu. in.
- hip straps to distribute weight to hips – The Osprey has real hiking bag straps, but the Tortuga’s straps have pockets, so this one was a little harder.
The TLS just had a thin strap that won’t really do much, so it really lost there.
-not hard on my back: The Osprey won this one hands down. They have a great reputation of making bags that are good for your back. And since I was in two car accidents last year, this one is kind of a big deal.
All three options had all of the following things that mattered:
-front opening zip like a suitcase
-compression straps/expansion zipper
-at least one or two external pockets
- durable: Or at least they better be, I don’t want to spend money on crappy luggage.
Nice to haves
- convertible to shoulder bag – Tortuga lose here. They all have stashable straps, but there is no over shoulder strap. The Osprey you have to buy it separately but it’s still an option.
- Ripstop Nylon – TLS Motherlode loses this one.
- organization inside – TLS Motherlode really wins this one. A lot. There are pockets and dividers all over inside that bag. It’s crazy!
- not ugly – The Tortuga is ugly. It just is. The Motherlode is basic, it looks like a backpack, but it comes in five colors. I didn’t love the Osprey at first, but it grew on me. And I liked the red a lot.
- not horribly expensive – Tortuga lost. It’s two hundred dollars. The other two are about the same, between 100 and 130.
**Travel Cubes pictures are included in link, that review includes a full list of what I packed in the bag. 6 Sets Packing Cubes Travel Luggage Packing Organizers Compression Pouches(Blue)
Post-trip update: The Osprey served me well. I fit SO much in it. Everything on my packing list, plus some extras, and more souvenirs than I thought. I checked it on the way home, and because I could stow the straps, the airline could check it normally instead of doing something special with it like they usually do with backpacks. Also, the little straps to help lift the shoulder straps (forgive my lack of technical backpacking lingo) helped a ton in addition to the hip belt.
Also, I saw someone with a Motherlode in the airport, and it was much prettier online than in person. (But I could be biased)
Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique