EUR 26,11
+ EUR 2,79 (livraison)
D'occasion: Très bon | Détails
Vendu par tousbouquins
État: D'occasion: Très bon
Commentaire: Expédié par avion depuis les USA; prévoir une livraison entre 10 à 15 jours ouvrables. Satisfait ou remboursé
Vous l'avez déjà ? Vendez sur Amazon

The Paradine Case [Import USA Zone 1]

4.5 étoiles sur 5 2 commentaires client

Voir les offres de ces vendeurs.
6 d'occasion à partir de EUR 22,77
Promotions et bons plans musique CD Vinyle Promotions et bons plans musique CD Vinyle

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Quels sont les autres articles que les clients achètent après avoir regardé cet article?

Détails sur le produit

  • Acteurs : Gregory Peck, Ann Todd, Charles Laughton, Charles Coburn, Ethel Barrymore
  • Réalisateurs : Alfred Hitchcock
  • Format : Noir et blanc, NTSC, Import
  • Audio : Anglais (Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono)
  • Région : Région 1 (USA et Canada). Ce DVD ne pourra probablement pas être visualisé en Europe. Plus d'informations sur les formats DVD/Blu-ray.
  • Rapport de forme : 1.33:1
  • Nombre de disques : 1
  • Studio : Anchor Bay Entertainment
  • Date de sortie du DVD : 7 septembre 1999
  • Durée : 125 minutes
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : 4.5 étoiles sur 5 2 commentaires client
  • ASIN: B00000K0EJ
  •  Voulez-vous mettre à jour des informations sur le produit, faire un commentaire sur des images ou nous signaler un prix inférieur?

Descriptions du produit

Gregory Peck stars in this Alfred Hitchcock adaptation of Robert Hichens' novel. Barrister Anthony Keane (Peck) is defending the wealthy Mrs Paradine (Alida Valli), who has been accused of murdering her husband. Keane finds himself falling in love with his client, becoming obsessive about her to the exclusion of all else. However, the judge in the case (Charles Laughton) makes things difficult, adopting a belligerent attitude towards Keane because he secretly desires the lawyer's wife (Ann Todd). --Ce texte fait référence à l'édition DVD.

Commentaires en ligne

4.5 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile
Voir les deux commentaires client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients

Meilleurs commentaires des clients

Format: DVD
The movie is very proud to be a David O. Selznick film and displays it proudly at the beginning.

This is one of those movies where you go "yeah yeah" I saw before. You are probably thinking of Richard Attenborough's " Trial and Error" (1962) or Billy Wilder's "Witness for the Prosecution" (1957). Much of this film is predictable and then again maybe not. Remember this is a 1947 film.

Rich old blind Mr. Paradine, of whom we never met, is found dead; is it suicide or is it murder? Soon Mrs. Maddalena Anna Paradine (Alida Valli) is accused of having motive and opportunity.

Assigned to defend Maddalena is Anthony Keane, Counsel for the Defense (Gregory Peck). Even with Mrs. Paradine's wild past and alluring continence, Anthony, a happily married man, is sure threat the butler (o.k. the valet) did it. We the viewers also want to help him, as it is obvious if it was not the Andre Latour, Paradine's Valet (a very young Louis Jourdan) than you know who will hang. Not only that but we find the valet to be quite devious.

A plus that gives this film added character is Charles Laughton as Judge Lord Thomas Horfield.

Trial and Error (aka The Dock Brief)
Witness For the Prosecution
Remarque sur ce commentaire Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus
Par SebastoPol COMMENTATEUR DU HALL D'HONNEUR le 25 septembre 2007
Format: DVD
Maddalena Paradine (Alida Valli) est arrêtée et accusée d'avoir empoisonné le 6 mai 1946 son mari, le colonel Paradine, qui était aveugle. Sir Simon Flaquer (Charles Coburn), l'avocat-conseil de Mrs. Paradine, lui recommande comme défenseur Anthony Keane (Gregory Peck), l'un des ténors du barreau. Keane est persuadé de l'innocence de sa cliente et soupçonne André Latour (Louis Jourdan), le domestique de Paradine, d'avoir aidé son maître à se suicider...

Ce métrage mettra fin à la collaboration contractuelle d'Alfred Hitchcock et du très directif David O. Selznick, producteur, ici, à l'origine du projet. Ce dernier avait pour habitude d'intervenir voire d'interférer dans ses productions. Pour ce film, Selznic ira jusqu'à réécrire le scénario et se permettra de remonter à sa guise cet opus en gommant nombre des intentions du cinéaste d'origine anglaise comme certains travellings.
Sir Alfred Hitchcock désavoua derechef le choix unilatéral des acteurs par Selznick. Il est de notoriété publique qu'Hitch aurait préféré avoir au casting Laurence Olivier ou encore Greta Garbo...
Néanmoins, malgré quelques longueurs inhabituelles et un suspense parfois défaillant, on doit souligner la virtuosité technique du réalisateur où chaque plan est travaillé au scalpel.
Pour moi, l'un des attraits majeurs de cet opus reste la composition magistrale du débonnaire et fantasque Charles Laughton.
1 commentaire 2 personnes ont trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 4.0 étoiles sur 5 62 commentaires
51 internautes sur 53 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 Valli Victorious 23 août 2004
Par Kevin Killian - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: DVD
Alida Valli didn't make very many pictures in the USA, but the ones she did are without exception worth seeing.

In Italy, of course, she is as important to the indigenous cinema as Sophia Loren and Gina Lollobrigida put together. But here is the USA, she starred in a mere handful of pictures, and we remember her mainly via her connection to David Selznick, for whom she made THE THIRD MAN and THE PARADINE CASE. THE MIRACLE OF THE BELLS and WALK SOFTLY, STRANGER are also worth seeing. In THE PARADINE CASE, she is on trial for murdering her husband in a stuffy British courtroom, to which her sultry and exotic beauty is continually being counterpointed. She is a bird in a gilded cage all right, literally and figuratively. Gregory Peck falls hard for her, and it's watching how low he goes that makes this film one of Hitchcock's best. He even quarrels with his wife, the cold, perfect Ann Todd, and makes it plain to her and to everyone in their bourgeois social circle that he has fallen in love with his client, thus breaking all the rules in one fell swoop.

He begins to suspect that Valli has been framed, and he begins to suspect Louis Jourdan, Paradine's handsome manservant, of an illicit interest in his master's wife. The scenes between Peck and Jourdan are fiery and full of passion. Each of them is fighting for his life and honor. There is as well an erotic charge between the two of them. In a sense Peck is representing the colonialist who seeks authenticity by embroiling himself in the lives and bodies of a darker and more obviously sexed people, whether they be Italian or French. He gets slapped down for his efforts.

Even if you've seen THE PARADINE CASE fifty times, there's always something fresh to watch, whether it's Charles Coburn acting especially kinky, or Ann Todd from THE SEVENTH VEIL acting masochistic one more time. But most of all the movie is trying to make us see Valli as a new Garbo, who had retired from the screen and whom Selznick believed we would swallow Valli as a successor to. In my opinion, she's greater than Garbo by a country mile.
33 internautes sur 34 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 "That woman is bad, bad to the bone..." 25 février 2003
Par Schuyler V. Johnson - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: DVD Achat vérifié
Thus spake Andre La Tour, the valet and the catalyst for the murder of Col. Paradine. Valli is Mrs. Paradine, and she wants Andre La Tour, so badly she murders her husband and benefactor to remove any and all obstacles standing between her and La Tour. Louis Jourdan is La Tour, and handsome in a sharp, chiseled way; Valli is really something to see, very beautiful and arresting, and the accent further enhances her mysterious image. Gregory Peck, her attorney, falls for her, hard and fast, and is almost sympathetic in his desire to possess her. Ann Todd, a curious mixture of ice and warmth, is steadfast in her loyalty to her husband, and Joan Tetzel is good as her friend and the daughter of Charles Coburn, (I enjoy the banter between Coburn and Tetzel, he is always a joy to watch)who is a colleague of Gregory Peck's. The score by Franz Waxman is one of the stars of the movie, and haunting, as his music always is. The movie is unusual and quieter than the typical Hitchcockian fare, but should not be judged more harshly for that, but taken on it's own merits, which it has in abundance. Charles Laughton ("curious how the convolutions of a walnut resemble those of the human brain...") is wonderful as the censorious and righteous Judge of the proceedings, and rather an unpleastant bully to his wife, Ethel Barrymore, who seems rather wasted in this weak role as the much maligned wife. She is one of my favorite actresses, but I much prefer her in "The Spiral Staircase", a much richer role and one more worthy of her immense talent. I own this on VHS and DVD, and of course, the DVD is far superior in quality.
21 internautes sur 24 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Stellar cast in good Hitchcock picture 11 septembre 2002
Par Fernando Silva - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: DVD
Pleasant and interesting courtroom drama set in England, about a beautiful young widow, accused of murdering her much-older, rich and blind husband, defended on trial by a successful barrister who, in the process, gets caught under her spell, eventually falling in love with her.
Italian actress (Alida) Valli is alluring, ravishing, sophisticated and mysterious, as the lady in question. Gregory Peck is good as the barrister, so absolutely infatuated with Valli, that risks his own career for her sake. English actress Ann Todd is also good as his troubled wife. Others in this stellar cast: Charles Coburn, Joan Tetzel, Louis Jourdan, Ethel Barrymore and, last but not least, Charles Laughton, who gives an excellent performance as an aristrocratic, rather cruel and ironic Judge.
23 internautes sur 27 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 silly melodrama, but Louis Jordan is nice to look at 18 août 2000
Par Un client - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: DVD
Frankly, I can't see what the fuss is all about. We watch Gregory Peck's character make a fool of himself for an nearly two hours over his beautiful client, Mrs. Paradine, with whom he is harmlessly infatuated. Well, it would have been a harmless infatuation if he weren't such a damn fool.. making sloppy errors that no lawyer, as good as he is supposed to be, would ever make, no matter how moony and googly eyed he was over his client. The dramatic climax of the movie left me thinking, "Was that all?". The only high points in The Paradine Case for me were a young and very good-looking Louis Jordan, and the usual Hitchcock directorial touches; one scene in particular I found odd and strangely delightful: At one point Gregory Peck is confronted by Louis Jordan's suspiciously enigmatic character. The more they protest they hate each other, the closer they move toward each other, and the tension and chemistry was so odd I felt convinced they were either about to tear into each other like wild dogs, or make out. *laugh*
But really, the story is a bit too silly and melodramatic for my taste. I found Marnie to be a *much* better film [at least stylistically, and sloppy 60's psychology I can excuse more easily than melodrama], and I understand that it's generally panned, while this gets nothing but praise [from Amazon reviewers, at any rate]. Go figure.
9 internautes sur 10 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 Not nearly as bad as its reputation would lead you to believe 24 mai 2010
Par Robert Moore - Publié sur Amazon.com
Format: DVD
THE PARADINE CASE is widely regarded as the worst of his films made while under contract with David O. Selznick and one of his weakest films during the entire period after leaving England for Hollywood. Certainly the film is dull and unexciting. But it truly is not as terrible as one might be led to expect.

Most critics blame the film's failings less on Hitchcock than on David O. Selznick. Although Selznick was responsible for Hitchcock coming to the U.S., having signed him to a seven year contract, they both quickly learned that they had incompatible working styles. Hitchcock was extremely well-organized, and if the widespread myth that he knew every scene ahead of time is incorrect (Bill Krohn -- who provides with Stephen Rebello the commentary for the film -- dispelled this myth in his superb book HITCHCOCK AT WORK), he did have a very good idea of what he was going to do. He shot his films sequentially, which is a very unusual practice. In REBECCA, Hitchcock very quickly realized that Selznick was an interfering producer, and developed a number of mechanisms to keep him at bay, primarily only filming what he deemed necessary for the final film, leaving Selznick with no film with which to work for recreating the film in the editing process. For the most part after REBECCA, Selznick lent -- at a substantial fee -- Hitchcock out to other studios, so that over the course of their seven-year contract they actually did relatively little work together. But in THE PARADINE CASE, Selznick was at his interfering best. It is pretty well known that this film cost as much as GONE WITH THE WIND, primarily through the astonishing number of scenes that Selznick ordered to be reshot and because of the extensive rewrites he undertook. As a result, Hitchcock rapidly lost interest in the project, except to get it (and his relationship with Selznick) over with as quickly as possible.

When you read about the changes that Selznick made to the film, you can get pretty upset and wonder what the film would have been like had Hitchcock gotten his way. Frankly, the story sounds about the same and I personally doubt that it would have been one of his best films, but from a cinematic standpoint it sounds like it would have been fascinating to look at. Hitchcock had begun more and more to experiment with long tracking shots, pushing the limitations of the heavy cameras of the time to the breaking point. He had numerous shots that would have involved extremely long unbroken shots. Selznick, whose cinematic sensibilities were extremely conservative, killed all the long shots. The most grating amendment by Selznick comes in the first shot in the film. A servant carries a tray with drinks on it towards the back of a very upper class dwelling, he opens a door, and in Hitchcock's original cut would have followed him through additional rooms and passageways to the back. But Selznick jarringly cuts from the servant entering the room to his approaching his mistress, eliminating all the bits in between.

This shows the fundamental contrast between Selznick and Hitchcock. Selznick was obsessed with words; the films that he most fully molded contained endless scenes of dialogue. Hitchcock was a visual artist. He preferred to move the story forward with the camera rather than with characters talking to one another.

The interesting aspects of the film reside in two things: the excellent cast and the astonishing camera work.

Although Charles Laughton had been absolutely dreadful in Hitchcock's final British period film, JAMAICA INN (Hitchcock often sleepwalked through projects that bored him, like JAMAICA INN or STAGE FRIGHT or DIAL M FOR MURDER, and it isn't an accident that these are among his weakest films -- by the way, had Hitchcock had his way, there would have been even more of a JAMAICA INN quality to THE PARADINE CASE, if he had been successful in getting Robert Newton cast in the Louis Jourdan role -- Newton played the heroic lead in JAMAICA INN, though most Americans will know him as the greatest of all Long John Silver's, from the Disney version of TREASURE ISLAND), he is fascinating here in a small role as a lecherous judge. The brilliance of the camera work in the film is shown in one great moment involving Laughton. At a dinner after the men have withdrawn for their cigars, the men enter a room where the women are all sitting. The camera zooms in on a close up on Laughton looking off to the side and then cuts from him to Ann Todd sitting on a couch, with the camera then zooming in on her bare shoulder for an extreme close up. It is a brilliant moment, telling the viewer just about everything one needs to know about Laughton's character. One of my favorite character actors, Charles Coburn, made his only appearance in a Hitchcock film. Two other actors who appeared in a host of Hitchcock projects either on TV on in film are in it as well, Leo G. Carroll and John Williams (whose performance was largely left on the cutting room floor -- he would return for memorable roles in DIAL M FOR MURDER and TO CATCH A THIEF, and made more appearances on the Hitchcock TV show than any other actor, including several episodes directed by Hitchcock).

Despite Selznick's interference and anesthetizing of the entire film, there are some interesting moments in an otherwise exceedingly dull film. For instance, in the scene in which Latour enters the courtroom to testify, the camera describes an arc in following his entry and course along the back of the courtroom to the witness stand, all while keeping a severe close up on Alida Valli's face. Then, after his testimony is finished, the camera describes the same shot from his point of view. There is a great deal of excellent composition in almost every scene. If one wanted a template for interesting things to do with a camera, this film could provide it. Visually, this is one of Hitchcock's most interesting films of the forties. Contentwise, it is one of his dullest. We can only speculate the degree to which the boring aspects of the film were due to Selznick. Clearly, the film, already visually arresting, would have been even more interesting from a cinematography point of view.

The very long, unbroken shots that Hitchcock so desperately wanted to do in THE PARADINE CASE would find fruition in his next film, his first after leaving Selznick, ROPE. It was not a terribly interesting film except from a technical standpoint. Hitchcock would return to long cuts from time to time, most memorably in FRENZY, but never to such an extent. It would also be a few years before Hitchcock fully found his stride. But once he did he turned out a long string of astonishing masterpieces. Here is what I find amazing. If Hitchcock had never made another film after THE PARADINE CASE, he would be remembered as one of the greatest directors of all time. But in 1947, at the time of the release of this film, only about four movies would make the list of his ten greatest films -- THE THIRTY NINE STEPS, THE LADY VANISHES, SHADOW OF A DOUBT, and NOTORIOUS. His best years were still ahead of him.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique


Souhaitez-vous compléter ou améliorer les informations sur ce produit ? Ou faire modifier les images?