Actuellement indisponible.
Nous ne savons pas quand cet article sera de nouveau approvisionné ni s'il le sera.

Polar RS300X SD Heart Rate Monitor Watch with S1 Foot Pod (Orange) [Sports] (japan import)

Actuellement indisponible.
Nous ne savons pas quand cet article sera de nouveau approvisionné ni s'il le sera.

Derniers jours : soldes Sports et Loisirs jusqu'à -70% et bons plans
Jusqu'au 2 août 2016 inclus, Retrouvez tous nos soldes Sports et Loisirs jusqu'à -70% et bons plans.

Offres spéciales et liens associés

Descriptif technique

Information sur le produit
Longueur7 pouces
Poids455 grammes

Détails sur le produit

  • Dimensions du produit: 5,1 x 5,1 x 2,5 cm ; 454 g
  • Numéro du modèle de l'article: 90036631
  • ASIN: B001W9208S
  • Date de mise en ligne sur : 27 février 2013
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : Soyez la première personne à écrire un commentaire sur cet article
  •  Voulez-vous faire un commentaire sur des images ou nous signaler un prix inférieur ?

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) HASH(0x9a1d918c) étoiles sur 5 117 commentaires
57 internautes sur 57 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x9a1edb04) étoiles sur 5 Great training tool for runners...until it breaks 6 mars 2011
Par John Phillips - Publié sur
Achat vérifié
I love this watch. I own a Garmin 305 as well which I bought after a disappointing experience with the RS200. My biggest disappointment with the RS200 was that the transfer using one's computer speaker became difficult to impossible after a few months. Although it is an additional purchase, the flow link has solved the problem of uploading data to a users computer. While most competitors don't charge extra for a device to upload data, Polar does include a very comfortable fabric heart rate monitor strap. To upgrade the Garmin rubber strap it costs about the same amount of money as the Flowlink for Polar watches so it is a wash in the end. Nobody does GPS better than Garmin and mine has been a reliable watch. Although my Garmin gives me heart rate information, it is very simple. Polar is certainly more of a training tool and better suited for runners who emphasize heart rate training over simply how far they went. Garmin can give you an aerial map of where you ran but this is not very important if you run the same few routes around where you live usually. I chose the foot pod so that I could track my training distance indoors and out with my polar. It definitely needs calibration but once that is done it gives data that is very close to the GPS distance. The pod is a little larger than other companies foot pods but it is still unnoticeable weight wise when running with it. It uses a single AAA battery and is waterproof and gets an estimated 20 hours of life. More important than the foot pod size, I appreciate the normal watch size. The Garmin is a brick and even the newer models can not be worn as a sport watch during other activities or at work due to their awkward size. I am very happy I decided give polar another chance.

Update 2/20/12
I feel obligated to revise my earlier review. As mentioned in my first review, I really wanted to like this watch. It has the fitness test, gives information to help determine if you are overtraining and has a variety of interval work out options. I had to dump my RS 200 when the strap on the watch finally broke after about 15 months and was integrated with the watch and not easily replaceable. With the RS 300, the watch band has held up and the flowlink data transfer worked pretty well. It does take a few attempts to upload data but ultimately gets the job done. The latest issue with my polar is the foot pod. The S1 foot pod which is huge compared to most other brands suddenly stopped working after 12 months. I paid to ship it back to polar with the original receipt and they sent it straight back. Although it is not mentioned anywhere on Polar's website, the 2 year warranty is invalid when your order from Amazon. You have to buy it from a recongnized dealer to have a warranty on this product. I have paid to ship it a second time to the orginal seller who agreed to repair it. I received it back today supposedly repaired but it is still clearly broken. I now must call and am hoping for a satisfactory response from JOMASHOP. I would have already bought another foot pod but they are close to $100--way too much to reinvest in polar when it may also break under normal use in a few months and will be impossible to get repaired or replaced under warranty.

Garmin may not be sleek and they may lack a couple of the heart rate related analytic functions polar has but my 305 still works after being dusted off recently. Later models from Garmin have gotten some criticism as well but if I decide to upgrade my watch it will not be with another Polar product.
37 internautes sur 39 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x9a1edd2c) étoiles sur 5 Waste of Money - Hidden Cost 11 juin 2011
Par Kimba - Publié sur
I was excited when I purchased this. I did not even flinch at the cost as I wanted to track my running on the computer. I never got it to sync with the computer. I took it to a running store with the instruction book - they couldn't figure it out either. And the instruction book did not match the screens/menus, which were complicated and not well arranged.

I decided to keep it anyway. Well, about in a year the battery went out. You must send it back to Polar who will charge you $100! AND it takes them about 1 month. Then in about 1 year it happened again. this time, I took it to a watch shop. Unfortunately, then it only lasted about 3 more months!

So I am on the hunt for a new heart rate monitor and thought I should warn potential buyers - Avoid Polar in general and this one specifically.
18 internautes sur 18 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x9a1ede10) étoiles sur 5 Great For Speed Runners... 24 juillet 2010
Par Stephan - Publié sur
The RS300x SD is accurate and a great aid to my training. Once properly calibrated, the foot pod provides accurate pace read back to help me work on my speed and pace. Keep in mind that you should recalibrate the foot pod when the environment and/or factors change such as new shoes or running on a track versus a dirt trail. I also own a GPS training watch and if you are a runner more concerned with speed and accurate readings for pacing, this watch is perfect. For long distance jogs, I use my GPS watch. GPS watches take more time to determine the pace and the delay may be too long to be useful. The foot pod gives instant pace and speed readings. At first, the user interface may seem a little unfriendly but I found it to be quite easy after a couple minutes of playing with the watch. It may be a good idea to tuck in your shoelaces because the lace hitting against the foot pod while running may get annoying after awhile. The heart beat sensor was surprisingly comfortable. I am happy with my purchase and felt that it was well worth it.
17 internautes sur 19 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x9a1edf84) étoiles sur 5 Great product 27 avril 2010
Par Jeffrey Wiser - Publié sur
Achat vérifié
I purchased this watch after running my first marathon and having a conversation with a guy during the race, who was wearing a polar watch. It really came in handy during the race to make sure we were on pace for our goal. Using a standard watch is nice but as we all know, race mile markers aren't certified and therefore your splits will be off. The footpod is great but you absolutely need to calibrate it. Not sure if its my stride but it was not very accurate out of the box, I ran a half marathon (13.1 miles) and it registered about 14.5 miles. The menus are fairly easy to figure out but I did need to consult the user manual a few times. I personally love the fact that you can customize and switch between 5 different views on the fly while running. The heart rate monitor is your basic type and works well. Overall, I would say this product is worth it if you do longer races including or above a 10k or if you train by yourself. Having the information this watch provides is great for pushing yourself.
12 internautes sur 13 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x9a1f151c) étoiles sur 5 Confusing and doesn't do what I expected... 12 janvier 2011
Par G.G. - Publié sur
Achat vérifié
I've been researching HRM watches for a while and decided to try this one out (ultimately I went with the Garmin FR60). I had the Polar F6 before this and was pretty happy with it...until the HR strap went out and I found out that the only way to replace the battery was by sending it back to the manufacturer. I thought I would have a pretty easy time with this one since I've had a Polar before, but that was not the case. It has a very complicated user interface and I could not figure out how to get the calories to display for each individual workout. Instead, the only thing I could get was a total of the calories burned for the week - so I would have to subtract the previous amount in order to figure out calories for that day. In addition, the foot pod is really large and though you don't really notice it when you run, it definitely gets in the way otherwise. The Garmin foot pod is very small so I'm not sure why Polar's is so monstrous. The watch is also really big and it is not the red color that appears in the photo - it is emergency orange and not very attractive.

Here are the functions that were useful:
-HR is reliable and the new strap is better than their old model (with a user replaceable battery)
-Keeps track of pace and overall mileage
-Holds up to 16 days of workouts

Things that need improvement:
-The setup is not user friendly and I had to carry around the manual to figure it out before workouts
-You have to purchase the flow link in order to upload workout data to a computer
-Calories are not displayed for each individual workout
-Watch is bulky and a terrible color
-Foot pod is really big and requires calibration to be reliable

Overall, if you are looking for a watch that will allow you to track multiple activities, I would go with the Garmin instead. It is slightly more expensive (about $30), but worth it. The Garmin is much more user friendly and provides tons of helpful information.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous

Discussions entre clients

Rechercher des articles similaires par rubrique