Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.

Prix Kindle : EUR 12,57

EUR 4,52 (26%)

TVA incluse

Ces promotions seront appliquées à cet article :

Certaines promotions sont cumulables avec d'autres offres promotionnelles, d'autres non. Pour en savoir plus, veuillez vous référer aux conditions générales de ces promotions.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon par [Morgenson, Gretchen, Rosner, Joshua]
Publicité sur l'appli Kindle

Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon Format Kindle

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 12,57

Longueur : 352 pages Word Wise: Activé Composition améliorée: Activé
Page Flip: Activé Langue : Anglais

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

"Gretchen Morgenson is a national treasure. Year after year, she has dragged Wall Street miscreants out of the shadows, exposing their dirty secrets to the public that they bamboozled with schemes and deceits. Now, working with Joshua Rosner, she has trained her expert eye on the mortgage mess that pushed the American economy to the brink. In stunning detail, Morgenson exposes the truth behind the worst financial calamity of modern times, weaving a tale that is as mesmerizing as it is horrifying. "Reckless Endangerment" names the names and reveals the secrets of the plutocrats and politicians whose greed and recklessness threatened the foundations of capitalism. It is essential reading for anyone struggling to understand how America entered the new era of financial chaos." --New York Times

Présentation de l'éditeur

A Washington Post Notable Nonfiction Book for 2011
One of The Economist's 2011 Books of the Year

The New York Times's Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist reveals how the financial meltdown emerged from the toxic interplay of Washington, Wall Street, and corrupt mortgage lenders

In Reckless Endangerment, Gretchen Morgenson, the star business columnist of The New York Times, exposes how the watchdogs who were supposed to protect the country from financial harm were actually complicit in the actions that finally blew up the American economy.

Drawing on previously untapped sources and building on original research from coauthor Joshua Rosner—who himself raised early warnings with the public and investors, and kept detailed records—Morgenson connects the dots that led to this fiasco.

Morgenson and Rosner draw back the curtain on Fannie Mae, the mortgage-finance giant that grew, with the support of the Clinton administration, through the 1990s, becoming a major opponent of government oversight even as it was benefiting from public subsidies. They expose the role played not only by Fannie Mae executives but also by enablers at Countrywide Financial, Goldman Sachs, the Federal Reserve, HUD, Congress, the FDIC, and the biggest players on Wall Street, to show how greed, aggression, and fear led countless officials to ignore warning signs of an imminent disaster.

Character-rich and definitive in its analysis, this is the one account of the financial crisis you must read.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 895 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 352 pages
  • Editeur : Times Books; Édition : Reprint (24 mai 2011)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • ASIN: B004H1TM1G
  • Synthèse vocale : Activée
  • X-Ray :
  • Word Wise: Activé
  • Composition améliorée: Activé
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : Soyez la première personne à écrire un commentaire sur cet article
  • Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon: n°615.792 dans la Boutique Kindle (Voir le Top 100 dans la Boutique Kindle)
  •  Voulez-vous faire un commentaire sur des images ou nous signaler un prix inférieur ?

click to open popover

Commentaires en ligne

Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires clients sur
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) HASH(0x97e456e4) étoiles sur 5 314 commentaires
555 internautes sur 585 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x9802babc) étoiles sur 5 We need more watchdogs like Gretchen and Josh! 25 mai 2011
Par Srikumar S. Rao - Publié sur
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
I have long admired Gretchen Morgenson and cheered when she was awarded a Pulitzer. Perhaps this book in conjunction with her hard-hitting NY Times reporting will garner her another one. She deserves it. The authors echo my sentiments precisely in their introduction "...felt compelled to write this book because we are angry that the American economy was almost wrecked by a crowd of self-interested, politically influential and arrogant people who have not been held accountable for their actions." And the people who did it "...continue, even now, to hold sway in the corridors of Wall Street and Washington."

I have nothing against the vastly wealthy and sometimes - OK, frequently - dream wistfully of joining their ranks, but I do care about how this wealth is accumulated. Entrepreneurs who build companies, executives who take these companies to the next level and the one after that, highly talented and gifted persons - in arts and sports - who command premium remuneration all enrich society. Many financial titans, on the other hand, do not create wealth. They are unusually adept in extracting it for personal gain while simultaneously impoverishing society and holding it hostage. They operate on the principle that "My gain is mine and only mine. My loss is actually yours." And they know how to spread enough largesse that enablers like accountants, rating agencies and regulators fall into line and they buy off politicians with consummate skill. They try - increasingly ineffectively - to justify their existence by claiming that they perform crucial service by "allocating capital" and "increasing efficiency." They further claim that they should not be regulated because they can do a better job of regulating themselves. The fish is starting to stink pretty bad.

What makes this book a valuable read is that the authors explain exactly how this process works and they are not shy about naming names. For example, you learn how James Johnson, the erstwhile CEO of Fannie Mae built it into a colossus that gradually jettisoned all prudence in lending and vastly enriched himself and a bunch of cronies. He also suborned powerful legislators like Barney Frank, the powerful Massachusetts Democrat. And, lastly, he looked on and encouraged Wall Street firms to do the same and used that as justification to increase the scale of his own operations. And, Oh! I almost forgot, he also admonished fresh graduates to pursue their careers with "honesty and integrity". When Johnson left Fannie Mae, a senior executive recalled "...we always won, we took no prisoners and we faced little organized political opposition." He continued to be politically influential and was an adviser to the current president until forced to resign because it surfaced that he had received sweetheart loans from a leading purveyor of toxic financial junk.

Did you ever feel that "You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" is the norm on Wall Street? Consider this: Stephen Friedman, former CEO of Goldman Sachs was a director of Fannie Mae when the directors improperly allowed company executives to set earnings targets that they could meet. Federal investigators concluded that "As a direct result, senior management reaped ongoing and extensive financial rewards through accounting manipulation." Johnson was then inducted to the board of Goldman Sachs - when Hank Paulson became CEO - and promptly made chair of the compensation committee. He dispensed some of the richest paychecks on Wall Street and these became the norm as other firms played catch-up. In fact, Johnson chaired the compensation committees of every board he sat on.

Angelo Mozilo, founder and CEO of Countrywide, was a good friend of Johnson's and used his methods to grow the cancer that was Countrywide. The company made it a policy to give sweetheart loans to persons in power - these VIP loans were informally known as Friends of Angelo loans. Richard Holbrooke got such a loan. So did Senators Chris Dodd, Kent Conrad and Barbara Boxer. So did Donna Shalala, former head of Health and Human Services and Alfonso Jackson, secretary of HUD. And Countrywide hired sons and daughters and relatives of the influential and made sure that they were not fired during mass layoffs. Do you think it is possible, just barely possible, that these policies are what enabled that tumor to grow so large without surgery even being considered?

There were people who tried to stem the disastrous tide such as Mark Kohodes the money manager who shared damaging information about NovaStar - a Countrywide clone - with the SEC to no avail. And Armando Falcon, the regulator who tried to rein in Fannie Mae and was bludgeoned for his pains. And William Brennan of the Atlanta Legal Aid who drafted tough anti-predatory-lending legislation and then had it go nowhere.

This book will make you well informed. It will also make you sad because not much has changed in the system and the same players are still active. Can someone please tell me why we "respect" these CEOs instead of crossing the street when we see them coming our way?
225 internautes sur 238 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x97c61870) étoiles sur 5 Lapdogs as watchdogs, pols in the pocket and giddyup greed!!! 25 mai 2011
Par Laurence R. Bachmann - Publié sur
Format: Relié
Reckless Endangerment chronicles the screwing of America by just about everyone in power: dirty politicians, inept watchdogs and an insatiably avaricious financial community that knew better but didn't care. NY Times reporters Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner have taken the time to investigate not just players in the financial mess circa 2008 but the 15 years prior when Bill Clinton decided to get behind the dubious notion that everyone should have a stake in the American dream and own their own home.

In theory it all sounded perfect--who could object to people bettering themselves? The only problem was that to make the dream "accessible to all" generations of lending practices and protections would have to be dismantled. Safeguards would be gutted and due diligence would become a nuisance that is brushed aside. There are plenty of culprits here: the usual Wall Street money-mongers and in the 90s and early 00s a Republican Congress in their pocket. But Morgenson and Posner shine a powerfully bright light on the complicity of marquee Democrats such as Bill Clinton, Christopher Dodd and Barney Frank. Toss in Democrat insider Jim Johnson into the cauldron and it is a powerful witches brew.

Jim Johnson, quintessential DC insider used all of these connections in the 90s on behalf of empowering Fannie Mae and eviscerating sound financial practices. Greasing the wheels of powerful polls on banking and finance committees became standard procedure. Finding a sinecure for Barney Frank's boyfriend was a pleasure not a problem (if Frank isn't a criminal it is by a hair's breadth). Libeling the responsible, honest regulators and economists who tried to stop this train-wreck waiting to happen was all in a day's work, and a particular Johnson specialty. Edward DeMarco, Gary Gensler and Marvin Phaups are particularly heroic. When the occasional curious congressman tried to uncover Fannie Mae compensation packages, Johnson squashed them as well, more powerful than our own elected officials.

Sadly, all of the corruption above pales in comparison to Chris Dodd's attachment of an amendment that extended government protection to financial agency's other than bank (Fannie Mae, insurance companies, et al) As a result, we not only get to save Fannie and Freddie--we get to pay the legal bills of everyone who is being sued because of their reckless behavior. What did Chris Dodd get? Maximum campaign contributions and a sweetheart mortgage, naturally.

Today, who is getting the blame? The poor of course. The people who shouldn't EVER have qualified for a loan but could get one are now told they should have known better! Better than bankers who told them they could? Better than Wall Street regulators who told them they should? Better than Secretaries of the Treasury who told them they were fools not to? Today they are buried in bankruptcy or mountains of debt. Middle class Americans are paying the bill and the money class who created the mess are still meeting at Davos or presiding over their conservative and liberal think tanks.

If I have one criticism of the book it is with regards to full disclosure. While trawling the NY Times web site I learned that Gretchen Morgenson was once an employee of Steve Forbes and a campaign manager during his run for the presidency based in large part as a proponent of a flat-tax. Nothing wrong with that except Fannie Mae took the flat tax proposal as a threat and went after Forbes big time in New Hampshire. Their attack ads, which Morgenson presents as detrimental to the campaign were also detrimental to her self-interest at the time. This should have been revealed before chapter 1. Perhaps it means nothing but if we are critical of Fannie Mae for its lack of transparency, what about Morgenson?

Toward the end of the book I was incredibly depressed. It is one thing to be so royally screwed, but surely we have learned lessons from it and will prevent it happening again, right? Wrong. Morgenson and Posner make it crystal clear that pretty much the same financial system that was in place 5 years ago is still in place today. The 2009 revisions to regulations are about as dependable as New Orlean's levees. Massive bank failures in the 80s were followed by financial crisis and collapse in '08. Collective memory seems to be shortest of all and already fading. How sad and frustrating.

P.T. Barnum was wrong. In America today it seems there is a sucker born every second.
162 internautes sur 179 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x97e3abb8) étoiles sur 5 Finally someone gets it! 25 mai 2011
Par Raven26 - Publié sur
Format: Relié
Morgenson and Rosner have done their homework and written an in depth and hard-hitting book that reveals with perfect clarity how this mess began. It's refreshing to read a book that doesn't rehash the Wall Street stories we've all heard over and over. I'm much more interested at this point in the characters in Washington who were championing home ownership and enriching themselves as they set the stage for disaster, and who really have remained blameless up to now. The sense of outrage the authors feel comes through on every page and the book is actually a page-turner in addition to being a real narrative, unlike some of the other books on the crisis, with a beginning and an end. Great storytelling and great reporting as well. Read it!!!
73 internautes sur 80 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x97b4f54c) étoiles sur 5 "ATTENTION MUST BE PAID" 5 juin 2011
Par citizen fact checker - Publié sur
Format: Relié Achat vérifié
In many ways this is a well-written, informative and thought-provoking book. Despite the few errors of date and fact that some careful reviewers have noted here, IMO it should be read by every voter, homeowner, renter, investor -- every citizen -- who is determined no longer to be shafted by the powerful -- nor by the lawmakers' staffers who "earn" their money by burying loopholes in our laws such that even the most honest attorney general cannot prosecute perps who enrich themselves while they impoverish gullible voters, tax payers and their families.

There are some excellent reviews posted here, especially those by S. Rao, Raven 26, L. Bachmann, and many, many others, so I will make no effort to repeat their excellent work. I, however, am on my second reading of my hardcover copy of "Reckless." Taking notes this time inasmuch as I state in my title, above, from "Death of a Salesman," ATTENTION MUST BE PAID.

We must no longer be victimized by the powerful and their feckless, reckless, blind-eyed enablers: The true, accurate contents of this book -- despite the few errors that escaped the publisher's fact checkers -- may give you the impetus you need to get you moving.

The perps who brought about this mess while enriching themselves and impoverishing the public should no longer escape public scrutiny. ATTENTION MUST BE PAID!!

P.S. I have no hidden agenda. I do not work for the authors or publisher, or whatever.
68 internautes sur 77 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
HASH(0x97ea01f8) étoiles sur 5 Excellent Book, Disappointing Revelations about Financial Regulators 9 juin 2011
Par Loyd Eskildson - Publié sur
Format: Relié
Americans clearly were robbed of hundreds of billions of dollars as part of the 2008 Great Recession. Several good books have already been published that cover its causes; recently released "Reckless Endangerment" concentrates more on the role of the government, and especially James Johnson, Fannie Mae CEO from 1991-1998.

The 1992 Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act encouraged unsafe and unsound mortgage activities by assigning Fannie and Freddie a new affordable housing mission. The law specified that 30% of housing they financed must go to low/moderate income families, with another 30% to housing in inner cities. (Unclear whether mortgages to low/moderate inner city families count doubly.) Safety and soundness took a backseat to political goals and ideology. Down-payment requirements went first - the 1992 act encouraged buying mortgages with 5% or less down; the percent of Fannie-held loans with a loan-to-value ratio over 90% rose from 6% in 1992 to 19% in 1996. Fannie and Freddy's 'special mission' also provided political cover for growing/maintaining federal support (implicit Federal guarantee --> lower interest rates charged by lenders), and exemption from or weakening of some requirements - supposedly without these it could not meet the new housing goals and remain solvent.

Ratings agencies stopped demanding information on a borrower's debt/income ratio - getting the data delayed decision-making, and not requiring it anymore purportedly made the process 'more objective.' Moody's, S&P, etc. were no longer the cops on the beat they were thought to be.

Lobbying allowed Fannie and Freddie to help determine its new regulator - HUD, then led by Andrew Cuomo, was picked; it was seen as a weak and ineffectual regulator. Capital requirements were set at 2.5%, much lower than the 10% demanded of banks. HUD also 'streamlined' Fannie/Freddie regulations by allowing lenders to hire their own appraisers.

Johnson claimed Fannie saved American homebuyers between $7 - $14 billion in 1996, citing studies it helped fund. Intense lobbying and arm-twisting (eg. by Larry Summers, Robert Rubin) helped defeat Treasury's initial recommendation to sever ties with Freddie/Fannie; however, Johnson et al were not able to bury/change CBO analyses that concluded they had taken advantage of their federal connections to also fund political donations, lobbying, 'sweetheart' loans, and personally enrich management via much higher than warranted salaries - about $2 billion 'down the drain' in this supposedly holy cause.

James Johnson, however, was not the only player working to reduce regulation - ostensibly to better pursue social goals. Glass-Steagall was eviscerated, thanks to Sandy Weill at Citibank, bank capital requirements were reduced overall, asset-stripping (aka 'predatory' lending) was recognized for what it was - yet, allowed to continue, ratings agencies got away with dodging responsibility via claiming their conclusions were only 'opinions,' etc. Most galling, perhaps, was how threats to strip Fannie and Freddie of their special status was defeated by rating agencies' counter-threat to roil markets by downgrading F&F's debt (then $4 trillion, vs. $4.7 in Treasuries).

Meanwhile, Countrywide (a 2-man shop in 1969 L.A.) supplied 26% of Fannie's loans in 2004, espoused similar social benefit spiel, stepped up its own lobbying along the Fannie's lines, and not only eased requirements but also helped create deliberate falsifications. Johnson then brought KBHomes into the action -between KB, Countrywide, and Fannie, the destructive and illusionary pursuit of social-goals had become fully vertically-integrated. Alan Greenspan, reputed economic 'maestro,' continued his 'hear no evil, see no evil' pronouncements - based more on his Ayn Rand derived ideology than careful economic analysis.

'Repo' requirements for defective (eg. 'liar') loans were standard contract requirements that protected buyers in the event of early defaults. However, soon the volume of loans that could be forced back upon sellers overwhelmed the sellers' financial capabilities. Instead, buyers' willingness to acquire new mortgages sagged, and the entire process came to a halt - refinancings and new mortgages alike.

'Reckless Endangerment' ends with the author's vision for the future - a 'rerun,' due to Congress having failed to deal with the 'too big to fail' issue (one idea - increase the reserve requirements demanded of very large banks), followed by short current status summaries of the book's major protagonists. With the partial exception of Mozillo at Countrywide, none had been forced to return their ill-gotten gains and/or overly generous payments, none had even been charged with a crime, one had become governor of a major state (Cuomo - New York), and most were considerably better off for having contributed to the creation of America's 'Great Recession.'

So much for 'Honesty being its own best reward,' and 'Honesty is the best policy.' Meanwhile, back in Washington, proposed regulatory changes (banks issuing mortgages for sale to the securities market must either require a 20% down-payment or retain 5% of each loans value on their books) intended to reduce the threat of another mortgage meltdown ran into opposition from various 'poverty-pimp' groups - despite exempting loans backed by Fannie, Freddie, or the FHA (about 90% of the total).
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous