Aucun appareil Kindle n'est requis. Téléchargez l'une des applis Kindle gratuites et commencez à lire les livres Kindle sur votre smartphone, tablette ou ordinateur.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

Pour obtenir l'appli gratuite, saisissez votre numéro de téléphone mobile.

Prix Kindle : EUR 12,38

EUR 4,72 (28%)

TVA incluse

Ces promotions seront appliquées à cet article :

Certaines promotions sont cumulables avec d'autres offres promotionnelles, d'autres non. Pour en savoir plus, veuillez vous référer aux conditions générales de ces promotions.

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Envoyer sur votre Kindle ou un autre appareil

Rotten: No Irish, No Blacks, No Dogs par [Lydon, John, Zimmerman, Keith, Zimmerman, Kent]
Publicité sur l'appli Kindle

Rotten: No Irish, No Blacks, No Dogs Format Kindle

5.0 étoiles sur 5 2 commentaires client

Voir les formats et éditions Masquer les autres formats et éditions
Prix Amazon
Neuf à partir de Occasion à partir de
Format Kindle
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 12,38
"Veuillez réessayer"
EUR 139,83 EUR 0,82

Polars Polars

Descriptions du produit

Revue de presse

'Rotten... captures the rancid flavour of Lydon's punk and pre-punk life... a good read' --The Guardian, January 31, 2004

‘Lydon’s story is one of struggle and an almost foolhardy courage... for sheer eye-of-the-storm authenticity, this is hard to beat.' --Kerrang!, January 24, 2004

‘This autobiography remains – ten years since it was first written – a nihilistic, gross-out masterpiece.’ --NME, January 24, 2004

Présentation de l'éditeur

"I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die..." --John Lydon

Punk has been romanticized and embalmed in various media. An English class revolt that became a worldwide fashion statement, punk's idols were the Sex Pistols, and its sneering hero was Johnny Rotten.

Seventeen years later, John Lydon looks back at himself, the Sex Pistols, and the "no future" disaffection of the time. Much more than just a music book, Rotten is an oral history of punk: angry, witty, honest, poignant, crackling with energy. Malcolm McLaren, Sid Vicious, Chrissie Hynde, Billy Idol, London and England in the late 1970s, the Pistols' creation and collapse...all are here, in perhaps the best book ever written about music and youth culture, by one of its most notorious figures.

Détails sur le produit

  • Format : Format Kindle
  • Taille du fichier : 3210 KB
  • Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 349 pages
  • Editeur : Picador; Édition : Reprint (10 juin 2014)
  • Vendu par : Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Langue : Anglais
  • Synthèse vocale : Activée
  • X-Ray :
  • Word Wise: Activé
  • Composition améliorée: Activé
  • Moyenne des commentaires client : 5.0 étoiles sur 5 2 commentaires client
  • Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon: n°306.262 dans la Boutique Kindle (Voir le Top 100 dans la Boutique Kindle)
  •  Voulez-vous faire un commentaire sur des images ou nous signaler un prix inférieur ?

click to open popover

Commentaires en ligne

5.0 étoiles sur 5
5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile
Voir les deux commentaires client
Partagez votre opinion avec les autres clients

Meilleurs commentaires des clients

Format: Broché Achat vérifié
Sincère, cru et parfois maladroit, ce livre est la narration quasi-orale de l'histoire de John Lydon (Johnny Rotten) et des Sex Pistols. Sans détournement aucun, Rotten y règle ses comptes, y donne son avis, que cela plaise ou non. Comme il le dit au début du livre : "Je n'ai pas de temps pour les mensonges et les fantasmes, et vous non plus ne devriez pas en avoir. Aimez ou mourrez." Tout est dit.
Remarque sur ce commentaire Une personne a trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus
Format: Broché
En reprenant le "Dieu sauve la Reine" de façon fort décalée, Jeannot Pourri et les Pistolets Sexuels transforment l'Empire Britannique.....en...en....Ya en offizine judéo-bolchéviquo-maçonnique à la solde de la CIA, des hyènes dactylographes et des hitléro-trotskystes...Ach, Zorry grise, je perds un peu le sens de la mesure....Revenons à notre propos...

Donc Jeannot Pourri (SOB, rogaton, déchet, pourriture...vite un peu d'Elgar et Hofriedberger Marsch-ach, che me zens besser-)...

Bref never mind the bollocks, get yer ya's ya's out et surtout, par Crom et Kro, Long Live Rock Arrrggghhhhh et surtout God save the queen, the fascist regime et autres amabilités du même tonneau d'Akabi-Akaba et voilà !
Remarque sur ce commentaire Une personne a trouvé cela utile. Avez-vous trouvé ce commentaire utile ? Oui Non Commentaire en cours d'envoi...
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Désolé, nous n'avons pas réussi à enregistrer votre vote. Veuillez réessayer
Signaler un abus

Commentaires client les plus utiles sur (beta) 4.3 étoiles sur 5 123 commentaires
61 internautes sur 64 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Rotten, indeed 4 mai 2000
Par daibhidh - Publié sur
Format: Broché
At long last, John Lydon (aka, Johnny Rotten) has opened up, nearly twenty years later. The Sex Pistols remain one of my favorite bands, and Johnny Rotten one of the more interesting media figures in the pop culture, so I devoured this book. It combines first-person accounts of all sorts of punk notables and wannabes, and the observations of Lydon himself, co-written by Keith and Kent Zimmerman. I'll admit a bias up front - so much of the history of punk has been obfuscated, I value anything that comes along. I was eight at the time the Sex Pistols did their thing, and I remember being scared when I heard the names "Johnny Rotten" and "Sid Vicious" - I didn't know who they were, but they seemed scary names (and remember, this was before MTV), and the radios weren't playing them - they were phantoms and boogeymen, and all the adults seemed scared of them. I remember when I was a teenager, finally buying their album, and thinking, "What's the big deal? This music rocks!"
I'm glad to see some light shed on this period by one of the people at the center of the media storm. Lydon fills the book with tart observations - he retains his spite and anger and seems as volatile as ever. At the same time, I feel like he's pulling one over on the rest of us. Some of his recollections seem contradictory - perhaps very real to him, but everybody knows that one's perception of things changes over time. There's a subjective quality to this account that makes me long for corroboration. Some of the first-person commentary does back up Rotten's assertions, but I get the feeling there's impression management occurring (check out Goffman's "Impression Management" and you'll know what I'm talking about). Sort of retroactive damage control on Lydon's part.
My only complaints about the book are minor - I wanted more pictures, and I'd hoped for more commentary. I was really wondering what he was thinking in some of those shots, and the cryptic comments make them all the more enigmatic. Again, probably the way he likes it. My other gripe is the book seems to raise more questions than it answers - I wanted more!
The fact that he went to bat in court for the band (which is detailed at the end of the book), and didn't cut Jones and Cook out of it, even when they repeatedly sided with McClaren, is a character-revealing moment. They'd consistently shafted him, and Rotten could have easily blown them off and pursued the case for his exclusive benefit. But he kept them in, eventually winning them over once they realized where their interest was. Contrasted with McClaren's machinations, this righteous persistence on Rotten's part is inspiring. On page 283, he says:
"'Nice' is the worst insult you could ever pay anybody. It means you are utterly without threat, without values. Nice is a cup of tea."
That's part of what I love about John Rotten - he's a nutcase, wit, cynic, revolutionary, and clown, and you're never sure whom you're dealing with; he's a chimera, and he's certainly not "nice". All you can be certain of is that he's laughing at all of us. In this age of immaculately-packaged music superstars, Rotten's aura remains refreshing and subversive - downright threatening. It is simply hard to safety pin him down, and I think that's the way he likes it.
24 internautes sur 24 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
5.0 étoiles sur 5 The Pistols seen through the piercing stare of Johnny Rotten 9 décembre 2004
Par K Master General - Publié sur
Format: Broché
The constant criticism of this book is what is perceived as Rottens one sided ego about the events that created the Sex Pistols and the movement that would become punk in mid 70's England. What these critics fail to realize is that the book is from his point of view which he has had to become very defiant over due to all of the mis-information that has been reported over the years. This book represents his chance to set the facts straight and you can feel the underlying frustration that obviously drove him to write this book as you read the pages. Rotten explains in plain facts the atmosphere in England in the Mid 70's and the conditions that would combust into what the press would end up dubbing "punk rock". Reading this book allows outsiders to really understand what was going on beyond the masses of mohawks and leather jackets that would later cast the movement in a generic style void of it's original creativity. The book is hard to put down and provides a ton of laughs to go along with the vivid picture of life for the young working class Brits frustrated with a system too willing to wallow in drudgery and maintain status quo. Many at the time thought that Rotten was trying to insight anarchy when he was only trying wake the sleeping masses up to come alive and create change for the better in a time when England needed it most. A great companion with this book is the documentary "The Filth and the Fury".
31 internautes sur 33 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 In defense of the revered Mr. Lydon. . . 22 septembre 2004
Par Allison Suko - Publié sur
Format: Broché
First, I wish to take issue with other reviewers who admit to knowing absolutely nothing about the '70s London punk scene, yet feel qualified to critique dear Johnny's representation of it. The picture painted in this book matches up quite well with all the others I have encountered in my journey to understand this punk world that I unfortunately am too young to have been a part of. From "The History of Rock and Roll" documentary to the Clash's autobiographical documentary ("Westway to the World") to books and essays by and interviews with people who were actually there (Jon Savage's "England's Dreaming," Mikal Gilmore's essays and articles from "Night Beat," Greil Marcus's work, etc.), John's portrait of the scene flawlessly fits in with the others. As far as I am concerned, it positively reeks with accuracy.

Second, yes, John Lydon is obnoxious. It's not a secret that you're letting anyone in on. He knows it and takes pride in it, and his fans know it and love him for it. He is superior and he hates everything and he really is a c*nt (sorry if you disapprove of the language, but it's how the man describes himself). If you don't like him, that's just fine by both him and me. Punks didn't put much stock in trying to be liked by anyone. If you're trying to learn more about the scene, that's one key fact you should be getting out of this text.

Third, if you don't know what the Ramones "stood for," you obviously should have started out with something much more elementary in your "School of Rock--Punk" lesson. The Ramones stood for a return to the '60s. They wanted to take rock back to the happy place it occupied when it was synonymous with pop music, which is a noble quest. However, I suspect most of Mr. Lydon's distaste is based on the fact that the Ramones idolized the Beatles (their name was taken from an early stage name of Paul McCartney's--he called himself Paul Ramone for a while), and John hates the Beatles. Glen Matlock loved the Beatles, and it got him kicked out of the Sex Pistols.

Fourth, Clash fans have no right to criticize just because they see the Clash as a superior band and John doesn't share their admiration. Technical skill has absolutely nothing to do with what makes a good punk band. It's all about what you say, what your philosophy is, what you "stand for." I would venture to say that the Clash and the Sex Pistols are completely equal in their excellence on all counts. Besides, it's ridiculous to rate bands on musical proficiency alone. Claiming that the Clash were better than the Pistols because they played better is like saying that the Monkees were better than the Stones because they played better--sloppiness was part of the *point* with the Stones, as it was with the Pistols. If we based our like of rock on how professional and well-played it was, we'd all be hailing Yes and ELP as the greatest bands of all time. Which, you may have noticed, we aren't doing.

Fifth (and I promise this is the final count), how in good God's name can you critique an autobiography for not being objective? I should think it would be obvious that one cannot be at all subjective when considering one's own life. You want objectivity, read an encyclopedia.

There. Now that all that's said, I'll say my short little piece on the book itself. Great autobiography. The reader definitely comes away with a sense of the writer's (extremely abrasive) personality, a coherent look at the events of his life, and a clear idea of how he thinks of them. We see the rise of the London punk scene through the eyes of one at the center of it. And if you doubt the complete veracity of this representation, remember: the view from the eye of the storm isn't always the clearest view of the storm itself. Think about the Beatles at the center of Beatlemania. They couldn't comprehend all the fuss going on about them, but they were about the only people with a clear view of the group itself. In the same way, amid all the furor surrounding the punks, only one of the punks themselves can tell you what it was really like. If you don't agree, well, you weren't there.
23 internautes sur 24 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
4.0 étoiles sur 5 Obviously, it's great. 20 mai 2007
Par Irene - Publié sur
Format: Broché
I must say that I thought it was just a biography of the Sex Pistols, when it actually is an autobiography of Johnny Rotten, but it's great anyway. It's not only John's point of view about the band and all the controversies involved, but also the point of view of other people close to the band. It's quite easy to read, as John makes an amazing use of the words -everything he tells seems to be amusing!

It isn't wll-written, in the sense that John has written everything that would come to his mind, but I find it more real like that. I guess you'll agree.

To sum up, highly recommended ;)
17 internautes sur 17 ont trouvé ce commentaire utile 
3.0 étoiles sur 5 He's not all Rotten, really! 31 août 2002
Par A.A. - Publié sur
Format: Broché
Judging by the cover of my copy of "Rotten," I expected good old Johnny Rotten (lead singer for the Sex Pistols) to use his autobiography to deliver a snarling attack on both other rock musicians and the world at large. I was only half right.
While a good portion of the book is devoted to allowing the voices of other punk musicians to describe the era, there is a high level of anger toward other bands and punk figures. Sid Vicious comes across as a clothes-rack on drugs, while almost every other band labled punk gets called 'copier.' Quite a lot of snarling goes down, which gets old after a while.
At the same time, Lydon spends much of the book trying to dispell the myths and legends surrounding his role as the menacing personification of punk. In fact, as I was reading, I got the feeling that his underlying message was, "Hey, everybody, I'm not so bad after all--I'm really just a regular guy!" I found myself comforted by his rational and very un-menacing explanations of everything from the origin of gobbing to the Pistols' infamous and contraversial R-rated talk show appearance. Johnny Rotten even tells us that: 1) he loves his mum, and 2) he wanted to be a teacher! Most startling, however, are the very human reactions Lydon describes when detailing events such as the death of Sid Vicious and the breakup of the Pistols. However, just when I get cozy with this new image and accept him as a shy man blown out of proportion by the media, Lydon gives us anecdotes about cooking his own waste in a pan and serving it to guests.
Is this the real Johnny Rotten? Or are we just being pulled in as part of a Rotten plot to fool the personality-hungry types who read autobiographies? Although Lydon comes across as an extremely intelligent, interesting man, the pull of his media personality is so strong that I had trouble resisting it enough to allow myself to accept what the man says about himself as truth. I guess that's why he hates the media so much.
Overall this is a smartly written book, very entertaining, with a thorough look into the life of a fascinating person. For all of Johnny's explanations of the facts, though, I felt that he left out some of the intangible things surrounding the Pistols that made the whole thing come together: the feeling of the time, his own personal charisma, and the luck of discovery.
Ces commentaires ont-ils été utiles ? Dites-le-nous