Options d'achat
| Prix livre imprimé : | EUR 9,87 |
| Prix Kindle : |
EUR 8,99
Économisez EUR 0,88 (9%) |
| TVA incluse | |
| Le prix Kindle a été fixé par l'éditeur. |
Suivre ces auteurs
Une erreur est survenue. Veuillez renouveler votre requête plus tard.
OK
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - The Original Screenplay (English Edition) Format Kindle
Édition en Anglais
de
J.K. Rowling
(Auteur)
Format : Format Kindle
|
J.K. Rowling
(Auteur)
Trouver tous les livres, en savoir plus sur l'auteur.
Voir résultats de recherche pour cet auteur
|
|
Prix Amazon
|
Neuf à partir de | Occasion à partir de |
-
Âge de lecture8 années et plus
-
LangueAnglais
-
ÉditeurPottermore Publishing
-
Date de publication16 novembre 2018
-
ISBN-13978-1408711705
Les clients qui ont lu ce livre ont également lu
Page 1 sur 1 Revenir au débutPage 1 sur 1
Produits liés à cet article
Page 1 sur 1Revenir au débutPage 1 sur 1
Description du produit
Extrait
At the end of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, the powerful Dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald was captured in New York with the help of Newt Scamander. But, making good on his threat, Grindelwald escapes custody and sets about gathering followers, most unsuspecting of his true agenda: to raise pure-blood wizards up to rule over all non-magical beings.
In an effort to thwart Grindelwald’s plans, Albus Dumbledore enlists Newt, his former Hogwarts student, who agrees to help once again, unaware of the dangers that lie ahead. Lines are drawn as love and loyalty are tested, even among the truest friends and family, in an increasingly divided wizarding world.
This second original screenplay from J.K. Rowling, illustrated with stunning line art from MinaLima, expands on earlier events that helped shape the wizarding world, with some surprising nods to the Harry Potter stories that will delight fans of both the books and films. --Ce texte fait référence à l'édition kindle_edition.
In an effort to thwart Grindelwald’s plans, Albus Dumbledore enlists Newt, his former Hogwarts student, who agrees to help once again, unaware of the dangers that lie ahead. Lines are drawn as love and loyalty are tested, even among the truest friends and family, in an increasingly divided wizarding world.
This second original screenplay from J.K. Rowling, illustrated with stunning line art from MinaLima, expands on earlier events that helped shape the wizarding world, with some surprising nods to the Harry Potter stories that will delight fans of both the books and films. --Ce texte fait référence à l'édition kindle_edition.
Biographie de l'auteur
J.K. Rowling is the author of the record-breaking, multi-award-winning Harry Potter novels. Loved by fans around the world, the series has sold over 500 million copies, been translated into over 80 languages, and made into eight blockbuster films. She has written three companion volumes in aid of charity: Quidditch Through the Ages and Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (in aid of Comic Relief UK and Lumos), and The Tales of Beedle the Bard (in aid of Lumos), as well as a screenplay inspired by Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, which marked the start of a five-film series to be written by the author. She has also collaborated on a stage play, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child Parts One and Two, which opened in London’s West End in the summer of 2016 and on Broadway in the spring of 2018. In 2012 J.K. Rowling’s digital company Pottermore was launched, where fans can enjoy news, features, and articles, as well as original content from J.K. Rowling. She is also the author of The Casual Vacancy, a novel for adult readers, and the Strike crime series, written under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith. She has received many awards and honors, including an OBE and Companion of Honour, France’s Légion d’honneur, and the Hans Christian Andersen Award.
--Ce texte fait référence à l'édition kindle_edition.
Quatrième de couverture
J.K. Rowling’s five-film Fantastic Beasts adventure series continues with the original screenplay for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
--Ce texte fait référence à l'édition kindle_edition.
Détails sur le produit
- ASIN : B07BL2VNNV
- Éditeur : Pottermore Publishing (16 novembre 2018)
- Langue : Anglais
- Taille du fichier : 11565 KB
- Synthèse vocale : Activée
- Confort de lecture : Activé
- X-Ray : Activé
- Word Wise : Activé
- Nombre de pages de l'édition imprimée : 315 pages
-
Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon :
147,605 en Boutique Kindle (Voir les 100 premiers en Boutique Kindle)
- 28 en Children's Performing Arts Books
- 29 en Screenwriting
- 125 en Écriture de scénario
- Commentaires client :
Les clients ayant acheté cet article ont également acheté
Page 1 sur 1 Revenir au débutPage 1 sur 1
Commentaires client
4,7 sur 5 étoiles
4,7 sur 5
5 862 évaluations
Comment les évaluations sont-elles calculées ?
Pour calculer l'évaluation globale en nombre d'étoiles et la répartition en pourcentage par étoile, nous n'utilisons pas une moyenne simple. À la place, notre système tient compte de facteurs tels que l'ancienneté d'un commentaire et si le commentateur a acheté l'article sur Amazon. Il analyse également les commentaires pour vérifier leur fiabilité.
Meilleures évaluations
Meilleures évaluations de France
Un problème s'est produit lors du filtrage des commentaires. Veuillez réessayer ultérieurement.
Commenté en France le 19 novembre 2018
Signaler un abus
Achat vérifié
Le livre est arrivé plus tôt qu'annoncé et en parfait état! Parfait pour les fans de J.K Rowing qui veulent garder un souvenir du film sorti récemment ou qui souhaitent le découvrir en livre avant de le voir en salle.
7 personnes ont trouvé cela utile
Utile
Commenté en France le 20 février 2019
The conflict between the Purebloods on one hand and Les Non-Magiques, the Muggles, the No-Maj, the Can’t-Spells, on the other hand, is rather simple and as such is humdrum and even slightly boring. To give some weight to this conflict it concentrates on the situation between Angus Dumbledore and Gellert Grindelwald who were at Hogwarts at the same time and had some kind of a blood pact that made them blood brothers, which blocked Dumbledore in the fight he should have led against Grindelwald, and the stake between them is Dumbledore’s son who is known in the book a Credence Barebone because due to strange circumstances just after his birth he was swapped with another baby who died soon after. That’s, in other words, melodramatic and slightly easy and the end then is that the unknown and unknowing son of Dumbledore is captured by Grindelwald and integrated into his own camp, hence betraying his real father who is on the other side.
But that is in a way freedom because the other side, the official side, the Ministry of Magic, and so on, is in the hands of some dictator who is imposing his rule through Aurors, some kind of SS that control the life and death of people if they do not think properly, both a thought police and a tyrannical police state. What is this vision a metaphor of? It sounds like the metaphor of Brexit when a vote that had been manipulated by organizations who broke the law during the campaign is made irreversible and an absolute obligation for everyone to have no courage to say no, I must say that Theresa May as an Auror is quite convincing in her Peter’s Principle, or should we invent the term Theresa’s Principles. Kick the door as long as necessary to maybe bring it down after a long while and many attempts.
I am disappointed by this screenplay. Ms. Rowling used to be slightly more convincing with Harry Potter and even with her mysteries or detective social stories. I guess she may have lost some of her magic and she expects a filmmaker to compensate this loss with special effects. I should get the two films soon and I will be able to have a more seasoned opinion.
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU
Achat vérifié
It’s only a screenplay. That means all the magic of the descriptions of scenes and the mental depth of the characters is absent and is only alluded to as possible special effects in the future film. I’ll have to watch the film to know what this screenplay’s potential is, but so far, the semantic content of the plot, if there is one, and of the characters is rather light.
The conflict between the Purebloods on one hand and Les Non-Magiques, the Muggles, the No-Maj, the Can’t-Spells, on the other hand, is rather simple and as such is humdrum and even slightly boring. To give some weight to this conflict it concentrates on the situation between Angus Dumbledore and Gellert Grindelwald who were at Hogwarts at the same time and had some kind of a blood pact that made them blood brothers, which blocked Dumbledore in the fight he should have led against Grindelwald, and the stake between them is Dumbledore’s son who is known in the book a Credence Barebone because due to strange circumstances just after his birth he was swapped with another baby who died soon after. That’s, in other words, melodramatic and slightly easy and the end then is that the unknown and unknowing son of Dumbledore is captured by Grindelwald and integrated into his own camp, hence betraying his real father who is on the other side.
But that is in a way freedom because the other side, the official side, the Ministry of Magic, and so on, is in the hands of some dictator who is imposing his rule through Aurors, some kind of SS that control the life and death of people if they do not think properly, both a thought police and a tyrannical police state. What is this vision a metaphor of? It sounds like the metaphor of Brexit when a vote that had been manipulated by organizations who broke the law during the campaign is made irreversible and an absolute obligation for everyone to have no courage to say no, I must say that Theresa May as an Auror is quite convincing in her Peter’s Principle, or should we invent the term Theresa’s Principles. Kick the door as long as necessary to maybe bring it down after a long while and many attempts.
I am disappointed by this screenplay. Ms. Rowling used to be slightly more convincing with Harry Potter and even with her mysteries or detective social stories. I guess she may have lost some of her magic and she expects a filmmaker to compensate this loss with special effects. I should get the two films soon and I will be able to have a more seasoned opinion.
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU
The conflict between the Purebloods on one hand and Les Non-Magiques, the Muggles, the No-Maj, the Can’t-Spells, on the other hand, is rather simple and as such is humdrum and even slightly boring. To give some weight to this conflict it concentrates on the situation between Angus Dumbledore and Gellert Grindelwald who were at Hogwarts at the same time and had some kind of a blood pact that made them blood brothers, which blocked Dumbledore in the fight he should have led against Grindelwald, and the stake between them is Dumbledore’s son who is known in the book a Credence Barebone because due to strange circumstances just after his birth he was swapped with another baby who died soon after. That’s, in other words, melodramatic and slightly easy and the end then is that the unknown and unknowing son of Dumbledore is captured by Grindelwald and integrated into his own camp, hence betraying his real father who is on the other side.
But that is in a way freedom because the other side, the official side, the Ministry of Magic, and so on, is in the hands of some dictator who is imposing his rule through Aurors, some kind of SS that control the life and death of people if they do not think properly, both a thought police and a tyrannical police state. What is this vision a metaphor of? It sounds like the metaphor of Brexit when a vote that had been manipulated by organizations who broke the law during the campaign is made irreversible and an absolute obligation for everyone to have no courage to say no, I must say that Theresa May as an Auror is quite convincing in her Peter’s Principle, or should we invent the term Theresa’s Principles. Kick the door as long as necessary to maybe bring it down after a long while and many attempts.
I am disappointed by this screenplay. Ms. Rowling used to be slightly more convincing with Harry Potter and even with her mysteries or detective social stories. I guess she may have lost some of her magic and she expects a filmmaker to compensate this loss with special effects. I should get the two films soon and I will be able to have a more seasoned opinion.
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU
4,0 sur 5 étoiles
Pour très jeunes adolescents
Par Dr Jacques COULARDEAU le 20 février 2019
It’s only a screenplay. That means all the magic of the descriptions of scenes and the mental depth of the characters is absent and is only alluded to as possible special effects in the future film. I’ll have to watch the film to know what this screenplay’s potential is, but so far, the semantic content of the plot, if there is one, and of the characters is rather light.Par Dr Jacques COULARDEAU le 20 février 2019
The conflict between the Purebloods on one hand and Les Non-Magiques, the Muggles, the No-Maj, the Can’t-Spells, on the other hand, is rather simple and as such is humdrum and even slightly boring. To give some weight to this conflict it concentrates on the situation between Angus Dumbledore and Gellert Grindelwald who were at Hogwarts at the same time and had some kind of a blood pact that made them blood brothers, which blocked Dumbledore in the fight he should have led against Grindelwald, and the stake between them is Dumbledore’s son who is known in the book a Credence Barebone because due to strange circumstances just after his birth he was swapped with another baby who died soon after. That’s, in other words, melodramatic and slightly easy and the end then is that the unknown and unknowing son of Dumbledore is captured by Grindelwald and integrated into his own camp, hence betraying his real father who is on the other side.
But that is in a way freedom because the other side, the official side, the Ministry of Magic, and so on, is in the hands of some dictator who is imposing his rule through Aurors, some kind of SS that control the life and death of people if they do not think properly, both a thought police and a tyrannical police state. What is this vision a metaphor of? It sounds like the metaphor of Brexit when a vote that had been manipulated by organizations who broke the law during the campaign is made irreversible and an absolute obligation for everyone to have no courage to say no, I must say that Theresa May as an Auror is quite convincing in her Peter’s Principle, or should we invent the term Theresa’s Principles. Kick the door as long as necessary to maybe bring it down after a long while and many attempts.
I am disappointed by this screenplay. Ms. Rowling used to be slightly more convincing with Harry Potter and even with her mysteries or detective social stories. I guess she may have lost some of her magic and she expects a filmmaker to compensate this loss with special effects. I should get the two films soon and I will be able to have a more seasoned opinion.
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU
Images dans cette revue
Commenté en France le 10 janvier 2020
Achat vérifié
Being a huge fan of the Harry Potter saga, I was immediatelly charmed by Fantastic Beasts. It is the same world we know with characters we have already heard about and new ones. The fact that it is a screen play didn't bother me.
Commenté en France le 2 janvier 2019
Achat vérifié
Le livre est tout à fait conforme à la description, sa couverture rigide le rend très élégant, je suis ravie de cet achat.
Commenté en France le 26 décembre 2018
Achat vérifié
Cadeau pour ma fille très heureuse de ce livre. Jolie couverture et texte intégral en anglais.
Commenté en France le 15 janvier 2019
Achat vérifié
Pour une collectionneuse comme moi c’est un incontournable malgré une certaine déception lorsque j’ai vu le film. J’espère que le scénario m’aidera àmieux comprendre certaines choses!
Commenté en France le 21 janvier 2021
Achat vérifié
Correspond à la photo, par contre sur la tranche il y avait des traces noir de doigt.
Commenté en France le 14 décembre 2018
Achat vérifié
Bonne qualité et délivré vite
Meilleurs commentaires provenant d’autres pays
Arkham Reviews
1,0 sur 5 étoiles
A huge disappointment
Commenté au Royaume-Uni le 3 décembre 2018Achat vérifié
This is the first Wizarding World instalment that I have actively disliked. While there are a couple of moments that capture the whimsy of the first book - such as the baby Nifflers - the rest of this long and convoluted tale can only be described as a hot mess.
First we have the absence of plot. While a lot happens in The Crimes of Grindlewald, it doesn't really have much cohesion. Instead, it came across as a bit of a collection of nods to fans. Did you ever feel that Nagini needed more backstory? Or Dumbledore needed another skeleton in his closet? If so, this is the script/film for you.
Instead, the script takes the time to introduce a whole bunch of secondary characters and attempt to make the reader care about them by giving them stupidly complex backstories. Which doesn't carry an emotional punch, because we know nothing about them. At least the script does a little better than the film in this regard because we have the benefit of stage directions to supply us with character motivations - and in some cases names - which do not come across in the dialogue.
The script is also let down by the abysmal treatment of its female characters. From major female characters who are sacrificed to protect the male protagonists, to ones that just flip their evil switch in the name of "love". I really don't know why Rowling seems to find it so difficult to write believable adult women. Everyone in this book seems to either be a non-entity or conform to a typical archetype.
It also very much came across as being filler, as nothing is resolved in this story. As people have said that there are to be a further three films in this series, I dread to think what the next story will bring...
First we have the absence of plot. While a lot happens in The Crimes of Grindlewald, it doesn't really have much cohesion. Instead, it came across as a bit of a collection of nods to fans. Did you ever feel that Nagini needed more backstory? Or Dumbledore needed another skeleton in his closet? If so, this is the script/film for you.
Instead, the script takes the time to introduce a whole bunch of secondary characters and attempt to make the reader care about them by giving them stupidly complex backstories. Which doesn't carry an emotional punch, because we know nothing about them. At least the script does a little better than the film in this regard because we have the benefit of stage directions to supply us with character motivations - and in some cases names - which do not come across in the dialogue.
The script is also let down by the abysmal treatment of its female characters. From major female characters who are sacrificed to protect the male protagonists, to ones that just flip their evil switch in the name of "love". I really don't know why Rowling seems to find it so difficult to write believable adult women. Everyone in this book seems to either be a non-entity or conform to a typical archetype.
It also very much came across as being filler, as nothing is resolved in this story. As people have said that there are to be a further three films in this series, I dread to think what the next story will bring...
Bex
3,0 sur 5 étoiles
"There Are No Strange Creatures. Only Blinkered People".
Commenté au Royaume-Uni le 1 juin 2019Achat vérifié
Newt Scamander makes me want to be a Hufflepuff, complete with my very own niffler. Sadly The Crimes of Grindelwald is less about Newt and his creatures and more about gaining some backstory about the characters following the events of the first book; this explains its poor rating generally across reviewers. Readers adore Newt and they adore his creatures, learning about them and seeing them to come to life on the screen with all of their quirks. The Screenplay loses all of those nuances and instead just elaborates on the connections between Dumbledore, Newt, Credance and Grindelwald.
I enjoyed the plot, although it is slow moving and has a number of puzzling elements and convenient devices towards the end. I like that familiar characters who we don't know a great deal about from the Harry Potter series, like Nicholas Flamel for instance, have been included and relatives have been better explored in some lesser known family trees like the Lestrange's; I really appreciate these nods to the wider series in books generally so this was really great. Newt's creature collection also is visited a few times and new creatures are introduced (although there was certainly room for more!).
The largest problem I have with these stories is that I just don't think they translate well into a Screenplay format - so much is lost and the magical elements are too visual to be captured in dialogue in this way. I find it hard to admit, but it does feel a little bit of a cash cow and I'm not sure I'll continue on with the series as a screenplay if further instalments are released.
I enjoyed the plot, although it is slow moving and has a number of puzzling elements and convenient devices towards the end. I like that familiar characters who we don't know a great deal about from the Harry Potter series, like Nicholas Flamel for instance, have been included and relatives have been better explored in some lesser known family trees like the Lestrange's; I really appreciate these nods to the wider series in books generally so this was really great. Newt's creature collection also is visited a few times and new creatures are introduced (although there was certainly room for more!).
The largest problem I have with these stories is that I just don't think they translate well into a Screenplay format - so much is lost and the magical elements are too visual to be captured in dialogue in this way. I find it hard to admit, but it does feel a little bit of a cash cow and I'm not sure I'll continue on with the series as a screenplay if further instalments are released.
mommabadcrumble
5,0 sur 5 étoiles
It's brilliant ....of course!!!! It's JK Rowling!!!
Commenté au Royaume-Uni le 21 juin 2019Achat vérifié
I'm a JK Rowling / Harry Potter / Fantastic Beasts fan ....so what's not to like!!!!
I'm certainly not going to give anything away of the plot line... but there's always some twists in the tale to surprise us.
Personally I find that hardbacks are definitely most appropriate and appealing for this type of book - a screenplay.
I know some people find it difficult to read a book which is actually a script, personally I just imagine each of the characters saying their own lines as I'm reading them.
I really hope you enjoy the book if you decide to give it a go and immerse yourself in the magic!!
I'm certainly not going to give anything away of the plot line... but there's always some twists in the tale to surprise us.
Personally I find that hardbacks are definitely most appropriate and appealing for this type of book - a screenplay.
I know some people find it difficult to read a book which is actually a script, personally I just imagine each of the characters saying their own lines as I'm reading them.
I really hope you enjoy the book if you decide to give it a go and immerse yourself in the magic!!
Anonymous
4,0 sur 5 étoiles
Review
Commenté au Royaume-Uni le 30 novembre 2018Achat vérifié
Saw the film.
Would like to own the second screenplay book along with the first movie book.
Definately worth it if you want to keep the movie fresh in your mind.
Or remind what happened in particular scenes.
See how some names are spelt, sometime when a beastie is said on screen you can't quite catch it.
You also see how it was first written and then adapted on screen, the differences are subtle. :)
Would like to own the second screenplay book along with the first movie book.
Definately worth it if you want to keep the movie fresh in your mind.
Or remind what happened in particular scenes.
See how some names are spelt, sometime when a beastie is said on screen you can't quite catch it.
You also see how it was first written and then adapted on screen, the differences are subtle. :)
LJBentley
4,0 sur 5 étoiles
I love Harry Potter
Commenté au Royaume-Uni le 23 février 2019Achat vérifié
As you may well know, my love for the Harry Potter series knows no bounds. I love it, I love it, I love it. Equally, I am in love with the Fantastic Beasts series. All I want in life is a house with a library and two bathrooms AND for JK Rowling to continue writing back story to the HP series. With Fantastic Beasts I kind of have one, now I am just holding out for the house with the library and two bathrooms (fingers crossed folks).
The Crimes of Grindlewald brings us to a character we first heard about in the Harry Potter series. The eponymous Grindlewald has been spoken of a lot in the Pottermore universe and it seems that we are getting to know a lot more about him and how he approaches wizardy. We are also seeing a remarkable resemblance of thinking to He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named (*coughs Voldemort).
What I love about The Crimes of Grindlewald is that it leaves you wanting more. Something that JK does best.
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindlewald – The Original Screenplay by JK Rowling is available now.
The Crimes of Grindlewald brings us to a character we first heard about in the Harry Potter series. The eponymous Grindlewald has been spoken of a lot in the Pottermore universe and it seems that we are getting to know a lot more about him and how he approaches wizardy. We are also seeing a remarkable resemblance of thinking to He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named (*coughs Voldemort).
What I love about The Crimes of Grindlewald is that it leaves you wanting more. Something that JK does best.
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindlewald – The Original Screenplay by JK Rowling is available now.






